Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: »World Cup Guide XIV

2014-05-11 00:30:50
so next time Poland will need someone who has a luck in new sokker engine :)
2014-05-11 00:38:51
we probably need you for the NT team.. you are the last one who had luck with this engine ;]
2014-05-11 00:53:52
Big difference between what works on u/21 and on senior
2014-05-11 01:00:06
:>
2014-05-11 01:03:41
U21 is more challenging because you have so much more to choose from. Form, skill distribution, stamina, ... :)
2014-05-11 01:19:20
he can be a good choise. i think he had a big luck on the first U21WCQ match in this season:D
2014-05-11 01:23:21
he is a really good coach but very lucky too :)
2014-05-11 06:37:29
Srbija - România
Türkiye - England
Magyarország - Suomi
Norge - Bulgaria
España - Hrvatska
Česká republika - Scotland
Eesti - Chile
Hellas - Latvija
2014-05-11 06:54:00
tell us the ecuation of striker goal ratio
2014-05-11 09:57:04
true, big diffirence - but luck is important in both :)
2014-05-11 10:50:44
ridiculous that I face the same team as in the group stage.
2014-05-11 11:08:36
:)
2014-05-11 11:11:37
All about luck ;-)
2014-05-11 11:28:38
I have a perfect score with Latvija against Greece, so yeah, I'm lucky ;)
But seriously, this shouldn't be possible :)
(edited)
2014-05-11 11:45:40
Seriously, it could be possible as soon as there are 2 pots but this situation is not great for competition i must agree...
2014-05-11 12:00:39
ridiculous that I face the same team as in the group stage.

Yep, that happening is a shameful thing (more as it's not the first time, and nothing have been done to FIX it). At least for the first match, DEVs should prevent that to happen. For instance, grouping teams in four halves, so:

- 1st's from A, B, C & D would play vs 2nd's from E, F, G & H (and randomizing pairs)
- 1st's from E, F, G & H would play vs 2nd's from A, B, C & D (and randomizing pairs)
- and from the second round on, random pairs

And, if that were too complicated for them to guess how to do it, they could simply pair teams by crossing the alphabetical order:

- 1st's from A, B, C, D, E, F, G & H would play vs 2nd's from H, G, F, E, D, C, B & A (pairs in this order, not random)
- and from the second round on, random pairs

Either method would prevent the nonsense of both teams of a same group playing *again* in the first round.

(edited)