Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: U21 World Cup IX Guide

2014-08-30 13:03:12
In group B Romania played their game an hour earlier, coach of italyu21 could easily calculate table and in that moment it would be

1. Italia U21 2 2 0 0 11-2 6 (goal difference +9)
2. România U21 3 2 0 1 6-3 6 (goal difference +3)
3. Bosna i Hercegovina U21 2 1 0 1 3-1 3 (goal difference +2)

So if bosnia needed victory by two goals, and if bosnia had won against Italy 3:0, Italy u21 will still be 1st.... 4:0, 5:0, 6:0 means bosnia 1st, italy 2nd.... with 7:0 italy is 3rd, and that was not possible.


So plenty of room, and im not saying because im from bosnia, but if you have chance to end competition of strong opponent then you should do it... im just curious how much can romania do now in WCu21
2014-08-30 13:13:10
stop developing theory into a novel, you're getting to far, calm down emotions because i see you're trying to be the smartest guy in the room and spoil my reputation ;] did i say that Poland did best on this WC and only beacuse of Brasil did not get trough? NO! so stfu finally

In three games poland won only 1 demerit was more to him than the guilt of Brazil.

First of all Poland not "poland". Second of all, check the circumstances of first game. We were playing with only 9 players on the field (one red card and one light injury). Tactic was good, Brasil was very lucky, we would win in normal circumstances. There was nothing i could do, or maybe you would win with only 9 players? Against Azers I could have done better but draw is not the worst result. So without malignant engine, we could have had 5 or even 7 points, would you call it bad performance?


I'm just saying that i was disgusted by the brasilian community, you all wanted to lose in purpose and you said that on public forums. Maybe Fabbro didn't think that way but on the other hand he did nothing to win this game. Tactic was awfull, especially in defending, looked like the easiest way to lose. Not to mention the chosen players from 2nd team

(edited)
2014-08-30 13:13:12
I think brazil did the best for his team. He tried to win also, he was close although with not the best. The schedule was not lucky for poland losing first match and with a draw in the second, but sure it's not fault of brazil.
2014-08-30 13:13:59
Fabbrogas would be crucified for his unnecessary risks?

and what if those players get injured on Sunday? the injuries are random, though the less you play them, the chances of getting injured are smaller...you have a point, but still i find it unfair..
(edited)
2014-08-30 13:17:22
but if you have chance to end competition of strong opponent then you should do it

it`s not a healthy thinking...you can do this, but italy already beat romania in the first match, so why to be scared of one single team, when you have other 7-8 decent opponent left in the competition...
(edited)
2014-08-30 13:20:24
+1
2014-08-30 13:22:28
Go Go Deutschland !!!
2014-08-30 13:33:07
Brazil made ​​no effort to win because they did not need the win. We were already sorted and we could not lose players due to injury or red card.

You as coach of Brazil, already being classified and not with a very large cast you risk losing a player to the second round of playoffs? I'm pretty sure not.

The community asked yes and yes I was one of them. Tell me who in the world of sokker not want to see the "Poland" disqualified at the world cup?

Let's not be hypocrites. Everyone waited for this day to come.

"Poland" is always Fortissima candidate for the title, who would like to meet her in the finals? No one.
2014-08-30 13:33:28
Agree
2014-08-30 13:37:00
and what if those players get injured on Sunday? the injuries are random, though the less you play them, the chances of getting injured are smaller...you have a point, but still i find it unfair-play

If any player get hurt on Sunday it will be not at fault. He did his part and made the best selection for this accounting.
2014-08-30 13:40:54
Go Go Poland
2014-08-30 13:41:30
You as coach of Brazil, already being classified and not with a very large cast you risk losing a player to the second round of playoffs? I'm pretty sure not.

of course i would use first team like tonio. I know that everyone worked hard to play on WC and everone want to get through or be eliminated in a fair way. If you do not belevie me, check my last 3 games in qualifiers, that's why montenegro is on world cup, we were fair for everybody. I would use the same rule in World Cup and i will use this rule in next world cup if i will be reelected, but not for brasil. if i will have a chance to take revange, i will take it.

The community asked yes and yes I was one of them. Tell me who in the world of sokker not want to see the "Poland" disqualified at the world cup?

Let's not be hypocrites. Everyone waited for this day to come.

"Poland" is always Fortissima candidate for the title, who would like to meet her in the finals? No one.


these sentences are clearly against fair play... You were trying to explain that fabbro used b team only to protect players and after that you admit you are against fair play? Nice approach...

Long live tonio!
(edited)
2014-08-30 13:43:43
http://online.sokker.org/stats/matchID/26815912/teamID/21120

look at my wednesday match, some people asked me why I'd played with 4 players I was going to put on thursday on the final. Because I was fighting for something, if you're not playing for nothing why take the risk, why play with the best tactic. It's ridiculous. Anyway I still think fabbrogas didn't wanted to lose the last match, he played decent tactic with decent rating.
2014-08-30 13:46:40
btw. pls do not try to make me look like I only blame Brasil for Poland not getting through.

I know that 33% of guilt is on me (only draw against Azers), 33% on engine (unlucky lose against Brasil) and 33% on Brasil, who let go last game and took away my last chance. On 2 of these reasons I did not have any affect, that's why i'm sad. But it does not mean i can't expect or at least comment fair play approach of other teams
2014-08-30 13:47:31
My opinion:
Of course its not really fair to play with b-team.
But: Poland went out not because of Brasil. You just got too less points.
And we have to be honest: If Switzeland or an other "lttle" team would be on the place of Poland, nobody would talk here about fair-play, then it would just be "normal" that Brasil played b-team, and perhaps a bit bad-luck.
I would be angry too, if I was the coach of Poland. Believe me.
But Poland has to stand up, next World-cup will come. And then you can show us all, that the team is still the best.
2014-08-30 13:52:42
Agree. The forum is free. And each has a thought, I can not change the way you think and you can not change mine.

Having respect among both all discução is healthy.