Subject: NEWS Sokker- big changes are coming!

In Diary of Development 72, is Sokker anouncing things already developed like the 7 player bench? or anouncing that nothing new has been done? What a great news!

It was an old diary. They had already 73 in September. Probably some misclick :-).

It's sth more than just a misclick. Hard to say what happened or what devs were/are doing but something was messed up. I got that DD yesterday, while on English language, then I switched to Polish, possible also German and ultimately Spanish before I switched back to English. I have now that diary with Spanish title (although all the rest is in English) and I have 44 messages in pressroom but it was 45 yesterday which is strange because I didn't remove anything, nor I know if it is even possible.

I guess you've crashed Sokker ;)

Hang him

and it's been around for a very long time, as long as it sets in from the first minute

Got an injuried player today (one of my trainees), for 7 days. If my memory doesn’t play tricks, I remember 7 days still are slightly injuried. Unfortunately on the training screen he appears with no % of training. Is this a bug or one of the big changes that we are waiting? :/

I also have a 7 day injury and no % for training.

Therefore, no training for him.

=(

A solution must be found for penalty shootouts
Football players constantly throw it at the goalkeeper
I missed 2 penalties again in my last match, this is ridiculous.

Michal Káník 19 outstanding [12] outfield 1 = 36 to 39 skillsum | result: sumskill 32 or 34 with stamina
Richard Vavřička 18 excellent [10] GK 2 = 31 to 34 skillsum | result: sumskill 21 or 28 with stamina
Prokop Mestl 18 formidable [11] outfield 3 = 35 to 38 skillsum | result: sumskill 37 or 38 with stamina | predicted: 39
Marcel Kudláček 18 formidable [11] outfield 3 = 35 to 38 skillsum | result: sumskill 32 or 36 with stamina | predicted: 37
Arnošt Heřmánek 17 good [7] outfield 3 = 23 to 26 skillsum | result: sumskill 26 or 28 with stamina | predicted: 22

This is the graph for Arnošt Heřmánek:


So from my test, counting only outfield players it is 2 of 4 correct, that is 50% unlike Mikoos's 90%.
50% is flip of a coin chance indicating no correlation. But the base of statistic is too low to dismiss it. The prediction is close enough. I just wanted to prove that Mikoos's 90% is not correct.

We could try to continue the exercise, but the next juniors i have are too far now. And i may kick some of them before they "hatch" :-).
Martin Starka 17 solid [8] outfield 5
Zdeněk Hronec 18 excellent [10] outfield 6
Tomáš Joldán 20 outstanding [12] outfield 7
Cyril Vyšehradský 17 adequate [6] outfield 7
Jaroslav Chládek 17 adequate [6] outfield 10

just pulled a GK out ! WTF?

Dražan Čerina, age: 19, height: 182 cm
value: 33 750 €, wage: 650 €
club: prodajem piliće, country: Hrvatska
form [9] very good, tactical discipline [0] tragic

stamina [6] adequate, keeper [1] hopeless
pace [7] good, defender [3] poor
technique [1] hopeless, playmaker [1] hopeless
passing [2] unsatisfactory, striker [4] weak

For sure I will review whole algorithm for juniors later. Later means after 2-3 weeks. Now I have to much real-life work.

I just noticed that SV has the junior skill history in the format that your tool needs that makes it easy to compare so lets add some historical stats:
Vojtěch Chrobák (7 6 6 7 7 7 7 8 8 7 8 8 8 7 8 9 9 9 8 10 10 9 ) | Est: 29 | Result: Sum of skills: [33] = [30] + [3] stamina | FAIL
Václav Chlapec (7 7 8 6 8 7 8 9 9 8 9 10 10 9 10 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 12 13 13 14 13 14 14 14 ) | Est: 47 | Result: Sum of skills: [49] = [49] + [0] stamina | PASS
Chrudoš Grombíř (3 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 5 6 7 7 6 8 7 6 8 9 9 9 9 9 10 10 9 ) | Est: 31 | Result: Sum of skills: [33] = [30] + [3] stamina | PASS
Vojtěch Hlahůlek (7 6 6 7 7 8 8 8 8 9 10 9 10 11 10 11 11 12 11 12 13 13 13 13 15 15 15) | Est: 49 | Result: Sum of skills: [48] = [46] + [2] stamina | PASS
Prokop Štírek (6 6 5 7 5 7 6 7 7 9 8 9 8 9 8 9 10 11 11 10 11 11 11 11 11 12 13 13 13 14 14 14 14) | Est: 47 | Result: Sum of skills: [46] = [39] + [7] stamina | PASS
Jindřich Babica (6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 14) | Est: 45 | Result: Sum of skills: [48] = [44] + [4] stamina | FAIL
Ivo Čert (7 7 6 8 8 7 8 9 8 8 9 8 8 8 9 10 9 10 9 9 10 10) | Est: 31 | Result: Sum of skills: [32] = [30] + [2] stamina | PASS
René Cvarda (7 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 ) | Est: 34 | Result: Sum of skills: [35] = [31] + [4] stamina | PASS
Vítězslav Dařbujan (6 6 5 6 6 6 7 6 6 7 7 7 7 8 7 8 7 7 ) | Est: 23 | Sum of skills: [24] = [23] + [1] stamina | PASS
Pavel Dráb (7 6 8 6 7 7 6 7 7 7 8 8 8 9 7 9 9 9 9 9 9 10 9 10 11 ) | Est: 31 | Sum of skills: [35] = [34] + [1] stamina | FAIL

That is 7 out of 10: 70%

Edit: Damn that looks ugly :D
(edited)

What kind of function are you using to determine the sumskill?
I tested it on my dataset of 46 players
Linear regression came with 65% accuracy (+-2)
Hard set ranges: 74%

I think >7.5 days is injury and <7.5 days is slightly injury.

That's why there's players with 7 days able to train and not.

The problem is that the UI roundup or down the number of days.

Suppose you get an injury of 8,3 days, it will show up as "8 days". One day later, it will be 7 days, but he will still not train (because he should have less than 7 days, and 7,3 days is not less)
Now suppose you get an injury of 6.9 days, it will show up as "7 days". So he will have "7 days" injury but will be able to train.

At least that's how I think it works.