Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: NEWS Sokker- big changes are coming!
Wow, they leave the club even being delighted with the club's performance. Never seen that before
Bro last week 3 fans left me, while my fans are 100% in everything (Your supporters are madly in love with their club) ...
Today, 1 joined XD And as I already said, it is known that this is relative to the country, and it is still very stupid...
Today, 1 joined XD And as I already said, it is known that this is relative to the country, and it is still very stupid...
Crazy! It seems that being competitive and playing the game as it should be played is not the way anymore
It depends on league level / opponents. If you created no ceiling and based regardless of opponents, then there would be teams with 6000 or 8000+ fan clubs which would result in crazy high ticket incomes. These limits are made on purpose and are logical.
Yeah, I feel like half the people complaining are scenarios like this. Of course, 2 of your best 11 injuries isn't fun...it's also not THAT unusual, especially if you don't rotate lineups/players.
I still try and do this. I do my best to avoid any player playing more than 180 'active minutes' a week (friendly doesn't count).
I still try and do this. I do my best to avoid any player playing more than 180 'active minutes' a week (friendly doesn't count).
Still, there must be something wrong with injuries bro ( or somrthing has drastically changed - was it ? ).
My players are getting injuried consecutively after returning from injuries.
Look at this:
https://sokker.org/player_stats/PID/39667751
https://sokker.org/player_stats/PID/39456179 ( this one just got injuried again ).
My players are getting injuried consecutively after returning from injuries.
Look at this:
https://sokker.org/player_stats/PID/39667751
https://sokker.org/player_stats/PID/39456179 ( this one just got injuried again ).
I am not arguing against you guys. Really.
I just think some people play their guys 300 minutes week after week, and wonder why they eventually get hit with injuries. I agree with all of you that it is absolutely not enjoyable. Although my personal feelings aren't so much an issue with injury frequency, but more along the lines of length of injuries (27 days isn't REALLY 27 days for first team players...its more like 33-37 days. Season's basically cooked.
edit: It's not like I love playing corner friendlies, and forfeiting out of my national cup right away. This is the product we've been given and choices had to be made based on what we're dealing with.
(edited)
I just think some people play their guys 300 minutes week after week, and wonder why they eventually get hit with injuries. I agree with all of you that it is absolutely not enjoyable. Although my personal feelings aren't so much an issue with injury frequency, but more along the lines of length of injuries (27 days isn't REALLY 27 days for first team players...its more like 33-37 days. Season's basically cooked.
edit: It's not like I love playing corner friendlies, and forfeiting out of my national cup right away. This is the product we've been given and choices had to be made based on what we're dealing with.
(edited)
In terms of number of injuries it doesnt matter if you have 11 or 40 players and if you rotate them or not.
Player who has 270min played already in a week has exactly same chance of injury as a player with 0 minutes when they start the game. There’s no such thing as post match fatigue in the game.
Player who has 270min played already in a week has exactly same chance of injury as a player with 0 minutes when they start the game. There’s no such thing as post match fatigue in the game.
I know this game isn't complex enough to factor in accumulated fatigue over any longer than the match he's in, but how many dice rolls do you want to make in a given week - month - or season?
The player with 270 minutes played has (edit: 33%) more chances to get injured, on average, than a guy playing 180 minutes.
(edited)
The player with 270 minutes played has (edit: 33%) more chances to get injured, on average, than a guy playing 180 minutes.
(edited)
Doesnt matter in terms of number of injuries, you have to play a game anyway, so you will still have 180 + 90 instead of 270, so same chance of injury, just spread to 2 players not 1.
That's the whole issue, if you play normally you HAVE to play 3-4 games a week, so 270-360 minutes per position. You have league, league, IC, national cup. That's 4 games. Obviously you can stop playing half of the games and just give walkovers but that sounds like the absolutely worst possible solution that a game should provide. The game should never be created in a way that encourages not playing.
(edited)
That's the whole issue, if you play normally you HAVE to play 3-4 games a week, so 270-360 minutes per position. You have league, league, IC, national cup. That's 4 games. Obviously you can stop playing half of the games and just give walkovers but that sounds like the absolutely worst possible solution that a game should provide. The game should never be created in a way that encourages not playing.
(edited)
And again.. how random is this when i have 2 players getting injuried the entire season?
Since you like odds, how probable is to get only 2 players out of 22 injuried everytime ? And one of them only play 90 mins.
There must be something wrong.
Since you like odds, how probable is to get only 2 players out of 22 injuried everytime ? And one of them only play 90 mins.
There must be something wrong.
however the odds of them getting injured were significantly increased for both of them
Zawała: injured in a game where he had 53% activity
Coluccio: injured in a game where he had 51% activity, played as only ATT in safe tactic
if you use a "safe tactic" where you lose 0:15 anyway then don't use a good player as the one in the field...
(edited)
Zawała: injured in a game where he had 53% activity
Coluccio: injured in a game where he had 51% activity, played as only ATT in safe tactic
if you use a "safe tactic" where you lose 0:15 anyway then don't use a good player as the one in the field...
(edited)
Make sense i guess.
But Coluccio was in a "safe" position (supposedly).
I will take a deep look into this..
So, injury odds increase with players activity during the match.
The amount of time played is not really directly associated with probability of getting injuried ?
For a goalkeeper for example, who played 270 minutes in the week but had 0% activity, means 0% probability of injury ?
Didn't know about this.
But Coluccio was in a "safe" position (supposedly).
I will take a deep look into this..
So, injury odds increase with players activity during the match.
The amount of time played is not really directly associated with probability of getting injuried ?
For a goalkeeper for example, who played 270 minutes in the week but had 0% activity, means 0% probability of injury ?
Didn't know about this.
Update: Coluccio played 13 minutes with 2% defense activity las game he got injuried.
Yes, exactly, 0% activity = no chance of injury.
So if you play 270 minutes but get in total 20% activity, you have a lower injury chance than if you play 90 minutes but get 40% activity in total.
Obviously you can still get injured with 1% and not injured with 90%.
So if you play 270 minutes but get in total 20% activity, you have a lower injury chance than if you play 90 minutes but get 40% activity in total.
Obviously you can still get injured with 1% and not injured with 90%.
My 32-year-old striker is injured for 21 days.. We are only halfway through the season, and it will be more than 21 days until he is truly recovered, meaning he will probably return for the last 2 games of the league..
These long injuries are a nightmare, I only recently had 3 players return from serious injuries of a long period.. We must shorten the time of injuries! It is simply terrible!
These long injuries are a nightmare, I only recently had 3 players return from serious injuries of a long period.. We must shorten the time of injuries! It is simply terrible!