Subject: Bargain / Robbed topic 2.0

Only once bought player I didn't really needed. But luckily sold for same amount! :)
You can always choose which one you want to buy from me for "ko za tebe" price! ;)

---

Mikoos you are the goat of this. And I get your point, but please don't pick mids with low pace or directly without defense like somma. Those players are never expected to sell for high prices...

Historically, a 97777 tends to be very attractive to the market. And that's why i trained him like that. A 97777 usually sells for quite high. And usually more than a 68878 for example. Or any of those combinations with lower pace or defense.

Essentially, mikoos, the thing here is that even if this player had 3.4 talent and better graphs - i still believe i could get 2.3m - that's the story hehe

Because if you had sold this player I believe you get 6 or 7m. If it's coming from you.

In fact, there's only been 2 exactly like this player, one from borkos for 10.4 sooner this season, which of course is a better player, and then mine for 2.3 which seems low for the player. Buyer says it's a bargain, i don't think there's much to say.

But yeah, apparently my players are too ugly :(

I agree about low pace in Anuszkiewicz case, 6 is pretty low, but other examples are fine in my opinion. Niedźwiecki is close enough (also he was a fresh youth which in theory should make his price higher), Olave has 9 pace, I don't agree about low defence ones, having one low skill is great for training, or alternatively he is also good wing prospect if someone is searching for one.

If he had talent 3.4 then you wouldn't sell him for 2.3M, because I would bid him higher than that :)

Because if you had sold this player I believe you get 6 or 7m. If it's coming from you.
I wouldn't sell, because I wouldn't buy him in the first place, I don't buy players with weak talents :p

I rarely sell 18yo, I usually train players to 19yo unless I get a nice offer earlier. I don't rush sales, I have talented players so I can wait for offers because they usually come. I could make more money by pumping more players in and out of my team, but it would also cause more disappointing transfers for me.

I don't understand your complaints, you make good transfers too, but when you get them you don't come here and ask for opinions on those transfers, it's only when some not so great sales happen (and you still make nice money on them, like Krukowski one). You make a lot of money, but you paint yourself like an eternal loser when it comes to transfers.

I was talking in general about the examples you put, I did not dive into each one of them. Though, who looks the best at first amongst all of the ones you mentioned and babinowski?

I don't agree with what you say mikoos, basically because I only come here when I see the transfer prices are surprising. When they are normal, i don't comment here.
And please don't tell me both krukowski and babinoski haven't been payed on the lows...

Oh yeah trust me I think really like this afterall. It's quite possible that even with talent 3.4 and nice graphs i could still get a low price for this player.

When I make good sales I don't come here - Of course, why would I? I no longer need to know if it has been a B/N/R. Which is precisely the matter of the topic.

This is pretty simple: if I had seen any players like mine selling for those prices, i wouldn't have shared both players here.

Dude, I don't want to get into your club management strategy. But when I see a young player being sold by a club with a very high number of sales at a high frequency, I usually pass. I assume the player is being pushed to the limit in training. Which means he probably has no chance of increasing any skill anytime soon. If there's no information about talent, I'm almost certain he's average at best.

Maybe I'm not the only one who sees it this way, and that's why there's less interest in your players?

I don't know who's the admin deleting only my replies, as always. but you have all the proof there. You can compare with sales of others players. I think only a blind man couldn't see it.

Sure pmh, and i count with that - but wouldn't that apply to all the super mega traders and not just to me? It's a double standard. And it's actually the opposite of what is happening.

That's it, it was a silly couple of transfers that i thought were undersold. And they are, but I'm me. And since i don't need the money, i look greedy right? Not only that, it even looks like i lose the right to come here and share players!!


Time to go!

No, you're not so special that I should avoid just your players. When I was building my team, I bought most of my players straight from the academy or from the first team they played for. If I bought someone from a subsequent club, I tested their talent with the help of mikoos or simply by comparing their performance with my other players.

As for the main problem, your player's low price. What difference does that make for you? I sold above market, I sold below. I'm alive and well. Will anything change for you if someone tells you that you didn't get enough? The admins won't give you extra money or give you back the player. If you know your player was too cheap, why are you asking others for their opinion? Chill out and have fun with the game.

I have one question about this player. Silvestre Sanabia. I sold him, 1,5 months ago.
He is from small country. When I sold he was already in NT. I put the print of his talent.

It was not easy to find similar players. Maybe that is one reason. Bad luck or is there something more? Are Wingers worthing so much less nowadays?

some of those are central mids (+5/+6 in mid skills / ~season difference of training)

but the biggest difference is that since season ~73 there has been a huge deflation and the prices dropped
before 16-18yo players went for even 35-40 million euro, now the highest prices are around 10-15m euro

aside from that, I think that your player was worth more than he went for, even with current prices should've went for at least +1m euro IMO

did he have any talent info? you sold him pretty fast so without info people might've suspected bad talent
(edited)

Most of players in the list are MIDs with defense or even forwards. I just put 36 winger, 18y, 10-13 weeks. Not easy to find similar players.

I put the screen of his talent in the topic. I think it was 3,35- 3,7 in sokker assistent. I still have his screen saved



but this deflation occur for every position? I'm asking that because i sold one player after Silvestre, a central mid, from poland, and he got more money than i expected. So i was curious about silvestre.

Silvestre was just unlucky, it happens.

Yes, the deflation was for all ages / all positions. There is simply less money on the market so the prices are lower.

No problem. I got lucky other cases. It happens. So wingers are still worthy.

Thanks for the reply.

3.5m not sure about this one

Edward Kuśmierzak, age: 16
club: FROM, country: Polska
value : 30 500 u$s
wage: 600 u$s
very good [9] form
tragic [0] tactical discipline
height: 174 cm, weight: 74.4 kg, BMI: 24.57

tragic [0] stamina tragic [0] keeper
adequate [6] pace adequate [6] defender
poor [3] technique average [5] playmaker
tragic [0] passing hopeless [1] striker

if have talent definately worth. I was following him as well. Good luck on training

To me seems a N price.

Doesn't even need to have a 3,1 talent. Even a 4 talent would make him a great player and worth money, if that is the purpose.

But i really do appreciate the courage of those who pay so much in 16 year old. Because it can be a talent 3 or talent 7. As I said, even with talent 4 you can make money, but all 16 y can be a talent 5, or 6. Except in the end of the season.