Subject: »General Questions

No doubt thanks to kryminator.
I am not so sure about that. I wrote to devs, indeed, but I have no information whether the information have been read, not saying the answering, so it is quite possible that in some cases it does not show initially, but later or after refreshing it's there.

I choose to believe ;o) Anyways, I just thought someone actively did something, since Ripper got a notification and I didn't. All's good.

Unfortunately no chance to fix this, I will probably be without a tool in the future, what a pity! grumble
The only thing I managed to get while trying to fix it is a virus! :/
So I had to decide after 20 years not to use any tools anymore. Safety comes first! I have acquired a little bit of experience in the meantime. That should be enough. Thank you for your efforts, Kryminator.

Standing ticket can't change? which is 20k at my currency.

My terraces i set for 20-21-22k only filled by 25%.

obviously i could set it to under 20k for next match.

but it is somehow weird when terraces ticket price is cheaper than standing ticket price. :)

No, standing places have a fixed cost that cannot be changed

that what i was mention above.

standing can't change

my terrace price is equal to standing prices but still only filled up to 25%.

if only if i want to make my arena full the option is reduce the price below standing price...

but it is weird better quality but sell. below low quality price

you have a really big stadium for your ranking and fans, you wont fill it like that, you have to farm fans and ranking points, but that´s a long way :P

I can't get this player sold for 1 Euro but I can't sack him too because he is NT. Do I have to pay his wage forever now? He will never play for NT again btw... His last match was months ago.

https://sokker.org/player/PID/36939822

Only thing you can do is to ask NT coach to remove him from NT's squad.

Logically

if by 20 the arena is filled 25%

if i reduce the price to 15 the number of spectator should be higher (i don't mind if income is slight lower).

and yes what you mention is a long term path to fill the arena.

Which option do you think is better in terms of team performance?

Option A: playing 1 bad player (trainee) for 23 minutes and then sub him for another bad player for another 23 minutes, to then sub him for a good player (46 minutes sacrificing 1 position)

Option B: playing 2 bad players (trainees) for 23 minutes and then subbing them for 2 good players (23 minutes sacrificing 2 positions)

It depends on the tactics you and your opponent play. It’s also important how many positions you would like to sacrifice for young players. I mostly prefer scenario B when it comes to DEF positions, but I can consider scenario A for ATT positions.

Totally agree. I have the same vision as you. I am curious to see if there are certain factors that I may not be considering for an option to be always better than another

hey guys

In a junior game, if I make a substitution at halftime, is it still effective in helping the coach discover talent and the estimated level for both of the players?

I've wondered about this too. Does the assessment bonus go to everyone or just those who play?

I would assume it's proportionally to amount of minutes played. So playing 2 matches 45 min each will raise effectiveness level the same as 1 match 90 minutes.