Subject: »General Questions

maybe, but it is not worth to have assistants that high.. is a waste of money

---

It really is, and the worst part is you can't just get rid of them; it's really hard work acquiring them. I hope someday they decide to give them the power we pay for.

.
(edited)

Is it worth to consider making him an ATT? Or is it better to keep training him as DEF by now?

Łukasz Idziak, age: 18, height: 177 cm
value: 1 928 000 k G, wage: 11 600 k G
club: Fecha Libre FC, country: Polska
form [18] superdivine, tactical discipline [11] formidable

stamina [6](+1) adequate, keeper [0] tragic
pace [10] excellent, defender [12] outstanding
technique [4] weak, playmaker [3] poor
passing [3] poor, striker [8](+1) solid

For profit or for yourself?
He won't make it to 3x divine in striker skills so i would not train him that way. Unless 3x16 with 15 def is good enough for you

For profit. I am not really interested in keeping a player from Polska for now. I would rather prefer keeping national players or players who can become stars for their countries.

Just give him some more pace then and sell him again, I'd say.

Great! I'll keep the original plan then. Thanks for the opinions

What can we do with form players? last week all my player played between 90 and 160 minutes in the 3 formal games and I seeing the training, I find that...

I have a similar but weaker one:

17y

poor stamina, tragic keeper
very good pace, adequate defender
adequate technique, hopeless playmaker
weak passing, poor striker

DEF or ATT for profit?

Forget about ATT, only def, but he is still far...

Def is generally the go to way for making profit

Is it normal ''random'' that a player who's a regular and a Key player role in the team has only ''0'' form.
From now 15 weeks a row MOST OF THE TIME he is at 0 or 1 form, yes he went to 5 once and came as quickly down as it went up. he is a regular player, no injury no benching and the guy plays like he never played football before ...

1)Is there an explanation for it?
2) Is it a known bug/is it a bug at all
3) If it's randomness, then i don't know what to believe as it seems not to be random
4) If it's not random then how can a manager affect it, then it should be written somewhere in the rules.
5) If it's random, then it's broken and needs a fix.

Player in question: Mihael Divljanović [38795139]
Kevin van Nieuwkercke [39475102] -> that one last 50 weeks already...

Enjoy :D
(edited)

It is a well-known and heavily discussed 'feature' that created multiple theories by frustrated managers how to to bring the form up again.

When you collect and analyse all the theories, you'll notice that when manager a) shares a theory, then manager b) will state the complete opposite showing examples to substanciate his/her view.

All in all, I haven't seen any theory that was backed up with sufficient data. So I guess it is a bad formula which can only be limitedly influenced (i.e. no injury, playing regularly and successful)