Subject: »Sokker Questions/Answers

Yes. Indeed the numbers should be shown as a collective number all the time.
So, as you said...
If there is 1 assistant, his percentage should never be higher then 33% which is the maximum value an assistant could have...as being unearthly.
For Head coach and youth coach it should on the other hand be 100% since you only can assign 1 of each at a time.
Probably there is a small mistake been made, being it either a bug or a human mistake.

So, as you said...
If there is 1 assistant, his percentage should never be higher then 33% which is the maximum value an assistant could have...as being unearthly.

That will be more realistic, if we count 3 assist coach of level 16 like equal to 100% of training effectiveness, then one assist coach level 16 - 33.33%,
level 14 ~ 29.16%,
and level 12 ~ 25%.
And if count 3 * 14 it will be ~ 87.5%
3 * 12 then 75%
3 * 8 = 50%
(edited)

Did Fridays cup matches count towards this upcoming weeks training or the previous week. I'm confused since the skills update is on Thursday but the cup match was week 0. I just don't want to accidentally miss training sessions for my trainees.

Sokker weeks are related to economic updates. Nothing to do with trainings, which are updated on Thursdays

it counts to next weeks training, that's not completely new - for CC and U21 NT matches it was like that already before

I didn't found any changes, all matches, from Friday to Thursday still have training at Thursday morning

so if you got out of the national cup, will I play some other cup this season instead?

Does anybody knows if height plays any role within the duel of a crossball???

Cause today I conceded 4 header goals against France from this player:

Julian Traoré, age: 28

club: FC Vedarai, country: France
value : 2 565 500 €
wage: 30 050 €
divine [17] form
unearthly [16] tactical discipline
height: 168 cm, weight: 61.7 kg, BMI: 21.86

All 4 goals (first 4 attempts of France btw) were crossed from the left wing and headed by this striker, who was marked by at least 3 defenders, each time!
The defenders in my defence:

Jean Joliet, age: 26

club: Racing Roeland, country: België
value : 2 299 250 €
wage: 25 500 €
divine [17] form
magical [15] tactical discipline
height: 179 cm, weight: 78.5 kg, BMI: 24.5

Steve Thiryn, age: 27

club: FC kokory, country: België
value : 2 213 250 €
wage: 26 175 €
unearthly [16] form
incredible [13] tactical discipline
height: 176 cm, weight: 72.7 kg, BMI: 23.47

Dimitri Vermeersch, age: 28

club: Sultangazispor, country: België
value : 2 195 500 €
wage: 25 400 €
superdivine [18] form
very good [9] tactical discipline
height: 185 cm, weight: 83.4 kg, BMI: 24.37

Imo this ME is a joke!!

"Imo this ME is a joke!! "

I think you have to distinguish between ME and match animation.

so if you got out of the national cup, will I play some other cup this season instead?

For example, matches play from Friday 25.03.22 till Thursday 31.03.22 - will get training Thursday 31.03.22.

And if u didn't play national, certainly play frindly or friendly cup, to get more training level and experience or train more players per week

but are You sure that height counts in all these heading duels?

some times ago I even bought ATT who was supposed to be uber-header (198cm of height), I dont remember his exact skills but lets say it was something like 15/14/14 (the last 14 is almost certain) and this idea didnt go well - the ATT failed to live up to the expectations

I think you have to distinguish between ME and match animation.

Sure...if I knew what happened I could adjust. Now I don't know anything!
But it doesn't make any sence that that guy scores 4 times with the head, on 4 consecutive crosses from the left.
So the animation shows my defs to be right at his side when the cross arrives.
If the ME thinks they aren't there, it's no use to look at matches... I can understand minor fluctuations between animation and actual match course, but this? it's too extreme!
And sure...I can understand he scores 1...maybe 2 if he's lucky, but 4 consecutive chances from which 1 from outside the box! No friggin way.

"But it doesn't make any sence that that guy scores 4 times with the head, on 4 consecutive crosses from the left."

I think it's the animation... In reality, the short striker reaches first the ball, because he has a higher acceleration (on rules: Shorter players accelerate faster)
That's the way of how I interprete the fact, that shorter strikers score easier, if I play with a winger.
It's normal, that a player with axxeleration scores 4 times. It's not normal to present it as joals by a header. That's why I say the problem is on the animation and not on the ME. ;)

Read the report, please... And if you have time, watch the first half of my game... France - Belgium

Both, the report and the animation have the same problem. Both are generated after the ME has make it's own calculations.
Consider: Firstly the ME makes it's calculations and afterwards ME creates report and animation. They are chronically separate issues. There is no real multitasking (synchron process) in computers..

So he didn't score with the head? Maybe after the calculations I won, but the report says France did :-p

If this is true, you can throw the tactic editor in the bin! Completely useless! A touch in the dark, nothing more...