Subject: »Sokker Questions/Answers

So he didn't score with the head? Maybe after the calculations I won, but the report says France did :-p

If this is true, you can throw the tactic editor in the bin! Completely useless! A touch in the dark, nothing more...

"So he didn't score with the head? "
I would just say, the animation should show a goal, not by the head, but a goal as a result of faster accelaration (as it is described in the rules)
Perhaps (and this can be fixed), the animation creates goals by headers, if the striker takes advance of his acceleration. Perhaps. If it is so, then it can be fixed.

--------------------------------------------------------
"If this is true, you can throw the tactic editor in the bin!"
I am afraid you have not understand what I write.
- Tactical editor is ok,
- ME calculations are ok if we consider tactics, skills and rules
- problem is in the generation of animation and report

... and I just wrote the same, like in my prior post. I can't describe it more clear than this. You just have to distinguish between ME calculations on the one side (ME calculations based on tactics, skills, rules etc)
and on the other side you have the animation and the report (chronically later, as a result of ME calculations)

I don't misinterpreted... think about it... How can you know what is a good tactic if it's not correct shown within the viewer...
You can't. You cannot see what the ME calculates and you cannot adjust a tactic according to what you see within the viewer, because it might not be a correct view of the situation. You see a player lose his ball from a takle from behind, but maybe the tackle was from the front... It doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
And whatever you say, it won't change my view towards the ME if this is the outcome of the discussion. Cause it's like saying a cola might look for sale for 2 euro's but the system will count 3 euro's. Then the price on the cola is useless.

"How can you know what is a good tactic if it's not correct shown within the viewer..."
Ask Barros, or ask the Serbian manager (I forgot his name). Both can understand what is a good tactic and that's why they are always successfull, even if their teams are not so strong-skilled.


"And whatever you say, it won't change my view towards the ME "
Read again what you wrote...
OMG...
Man, first you asked "does anybody know", then I answered, you asked again, I answered again and again and again and that's your responce??? Me, I would thank the responder for his time, my dear Dtox-zero... ;)))

I like and respect you alot tsolias! You have made very good points in numerous topics, helped tons of people on numerous issues.
So I'm not unhappy with your responses, but I'm not convinced with ''this'' answer.
Both Barros and the Servian manager, as you state, are not visionairs...they simply came out as victor at the end of the calculation! They won the lottery, as a matter of speaking...
Look, I'm not cursing you because you came with this explanation, as it might effectively be the right explanation. I'm only cursing the game for being hypocrite towards all goodwilling managers who think they can actually make a difference with their tactical view, cause they simply will never know why and how they won, because the game has it's own code and will provide a false view of that code to us managers.
(edited)

That's all right! :)
I agree that one also needs luck to be successful and I'm also sure that successful people like Barros additionally have their secrets and that's why they are most of times very successful. They focus on details that are beyond my observation range, and that is why they are more successful than I am.
For example, some people complain about corner kicks and think they are poorly programmed by the ME. I have observed how the corners work and why the ball goes out of bounds. I have invested more time to do some testing and now almost every corner kick my team takes results in a great chance and very often a goal.

I don't expect Barros to explain his secrets to success. However, I think that everyone can discover some Sokker secrets through close observation. Secrets in tactical moves, secrets in how to get the most out of some skills, secrets in how to manipulate form etc etc.
Sokker has a lot of secrets and that's why I love this game and maybe that's why a lot of people have been playing Sokker for more than 10 years ;)

This is crazy. This is attendance in my league match today. Is this normal that with the new system?

Spectators: 2614
(edited)

You have very, very high prices set in comparison to the league level You play in

imo, that's the reason

damn you are right, I must have played for many last seasons with this ticket prices because I forget to set them lower :)) thanks

:-p
Supporters on the chairman...

F*****G thinks he's a big shot, mr dictator!!! :-))

Interview with the chairman... "I didn't realise the ticket price was too high!''

In the training page, team progress, when you see the details of a player, in the skills there is one called "experience" and also has levels as the rest, but what does this mean or what this "experience" do for the player in practical terms?

afaik, in practicat terms it is part of tactical discipline, which does not die while transferring player like teamwork do, but it also takes a lot more time to increase
both are components of tactical discipline which affects at least one thing in the game - how the players position themselves, which is especially visible on fresh gk without experience or teamwork

Also experience makes defenders slow down their opponents when chasing them

Hello

Does anyone know why manager Rafon (Club Go Go) is banned? And if he is going to stay banned?

Gr

I don't understand...

1st week: junior 16 level 4
2nd week: up to 6
3rd week: up to 8
[url=https://ibb.co/nMTLC4t][/url]
and then this is...

César Catrunfo, age: 16, height: 170 cm
value: 15 750 €, wage: 500 €
club: Viseu e Mantorras FC, country: Portugal
very good form, tragic tactical discipline

poor stamina, tragic keeper
weak pace, hopeless defender
average technique, hopeless playmaker
poor passing, hopeless striker

First he was underestimated 1 point
Then he was estimated spot on
And then he was overestimated with 2 points