Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: »Sokker Questions/Answers

2022-04-12 17:34:00
What if I want midfields that can shoot better? hahahaha come on
2022-04-12 17:38:26
I want a pink star with a 'C' for crying baby.
2022-04-12 17:41:21
Ok boyzz, relax, I missunderstood and now I got the point :)
and it sounds to me to be as an acceptable idea, to be able to train e.g. plamaking-skill to a player which played with ATT.
2022-04-12 19:18:15
:D

More than acceptable idea, I think it's necessary for a better game.
2022-04-12 20:08:57
My questions are: When a sokker year had a duration of 16 weeks i could predict more or less how many pop ups will get the players that i was training. For example, the last 6 years (24 sokker years) i am training young Goalkeepers. I knew that in the age of 22 my goalkeeper would pop up 3 times in GK Skill at least. 5 weeks each pop up more or less. Now that the sokker years reduced to 13 weeks means that my player will get as pop ups as before? 2 point something for example? Or because the matches increased every week he will get earlier pop ups than before like every 4 weeks? Ty in advance :)
2022-04-12 20:19:28
1st case (2 something pops per season in your case) - speed of training in weeks remains the same, there will be less weeks available for training.
2022-04-12 23:07:33
and it sounds to me to be as an acceptable idea, to be able to train e.g. plamaking-skill to a player which played with ATT.

It's not only a problem with teams and their players, but also with NT / U21 players who played f.e. with mid order to train PM, as a defender, or striker, but were selected for the national team to play on their normal order, as DEF for defenders or ATT for strikers. And this nullifies the training given on friday!
But nevertheless, that rule doesn't make any sence.
They want to make managers to be more tactical in their decisions initially, but then they limit the progression of a player in a way that is destructive for the tactics you want to use, in combination with the ME as it is.
PM is an overpowered skill that determines the reaction speed and decision of the player, yet they only want mids to be able to react fast and make right decisions?
And passing is used by all players, yet only mids can train passing? We might as well play sokker pinball...
Or this kind of football...

2022-04-13 20:54:59
Hi, I have a question.

If I play a player that is slightly injured (let's say 5 days), will he have more chances to get injured again, or he just gonna play not to the best of his abilities?

thanks
2022-04-13 21:01:11
players perform worse when they injured.
2022-04-13 23:21:28
and the chance of injury same as any other player?
2022-04-13 23:26:55
yes it is, don't mess it up with hattrick
2022-04-13 23:27:01
Theoretically, yes! But since their performance is worse, because slight injured players run and react slower, they might also concede more tackles, which puts them in more frequent risk, so in game, when playing an actual competitive tactic, no corner tactic...he's going to have a bigger chance to get injured.
Also, injured players have less stamina and players who burned all their stamina are more susceptible to injuries.
2022-04-13 23:27:46
that's the long version of the answer
2022-04-13 23:31:44
Yes, but it contradics to a degree the dry ''yes'' that you made ;-)
2022-04-15 23:27:45
I have changed my logo few days ago, but old is still on my main page. why?
2022-04-16 00:54:40
Probably it's on your browser's cache. Try reloading your main page (ctrl+F5) or clearing the cache