Subject: »Sokker Questions/Answers

useless player dont need formidable stamina, it makes him only useless player with very high wage

is there any reason to keep a "useless" player? no useless player is quite cheaper than a useless player without stamina... ;)

I bought this player for 409k euros today...

Cyprien Bueil , age 17
value: 157 500 S$
wage: 2 450 S$
adequate form

hopeless stamina hopeless keeper
weak pace unsatisfactory defender
average technique average playmaker
average passing excellent striker

This player hasn't played in any match and the user, who played sokker for more than 2 years already, sold him for the 1st time (Cyprien's 1st transfer). His talent was not shown and I guess he's a youth from this club. The reason why I bought him was because he is 17 and from the looks of his skills, I think he is around formidable/outstanding youth after being out from youth school. Is it ok to assume he's a talent?
(edited)

does a player get training in he played this week in the team you just bought him from? but you dont play him in your team?

if you train the position he played in (except pace and stamina), then yes.

yes, if he had the right order (DEF/MID/ATT) for your training, it doesn't matter for which team he has played

I would say he is probably an excellent pull, formidable at the very best.

Either way, neither of it confirms talent of any shape or form.

I have a question. There is someone that trains GK!?!

yes!

of course :)

Hmm. Ok. Let's just say formidable youth, meaning if he was a good youth at 13 weeks(best scenario imo for a youth to come out 17) , it takes 3 to pop a week to formidable. So he is talented?

or he could have been a 34 weeker and had talent of 6 or 7 and have no talent :)
plus he will be 18 in a few weeks... massive spend on him in my opinion...

My game is live? Hilarious, my sides are splitting

Bloody April fools day

He could have been in the school for over 20 weeks and still been 17 so i don't understand your logic.

Hmm. Guess you guys are right. I just thought he came out as 17 so it means he spent quite a short time in the school. Youths who stayed in the school for over 20 weeks usually are 18 or 19 year olds right? That's what SV show every thurs after update. I'm not sure.

twchnicLLY HE COULD HAVE COME AT THE START OF LAST SEASON sorry about caps...terrible onfusing keyboard... anyways... could have come at start of last season = 16 weeks.. plus its about week 12 now.. that means 28 weeks in school... thats a max... i also agree he was probably about an excellent youth... cba dividing by 3 or whatever the number is in terms of skills to find out...

Lol. Then it's a poor talent in the worse case scenario. Ah. Just live with it. :P