Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »Sokker Questions/Answers
that was my point... both have same chances to hit the ball despite Player B is much much better player but first one is having better chances to score since his striking is higher.
(edited)
(edited)
But with that logic, looks like player A would be better to have in 16m box then player B when dealing with crosses which is quite unfair imo.
no..its 50 50.. the only benefit player a would have over player B is that he is probably a cheaper wage :P
no..its 50 50.. the only benefit player a would have over player B is that he is probably a cheaper wage :P
So you are trying to say that quality of heading is not affected with scoring skill?
dunno.. but in both cases striker is divine anyway..
no matter what the player, they will have a 50/50 chance of winning the header..
when they make the header, yeah im guessing that striker improves the accuracy of the shot ;)
i dont know though
no matter what the player, they will have a 50/50 chance of winning the header..
when they make the header, yeah im guessing that striker improves the accuracy of the shot ;)
i dont know though
Take a closer look ;)
Striker B is having striking only brilliant, my statement was based on that ;)
But if quality of header is not affected with striking skill that would mean that 3xtragic striker would have same chances to score with header as 3xdivine one.
Striker B is having striking only brilliant, my statement was based on that ;)
But if quality of header is not affected with striking skill that would mean that 3xtragic striker would have same chances to score with header as 3xdivine one.
I think a player will win the header more times if he has 60% rating against a player who has only 30%.
winning a header is random, if both players are on the spot - 50:50.
the quality of the header depends on striker (header on goal) or on passing (header to another player).
the quality of the header depends on striker (header on goal) or on passing (header to another player).
folks sorry i was reading training and i didnt find anything that specified if 21 minutes of playing counted as playing.
yes, but the percentage of training gained is depending on time player spend on the pitch.
hello,tell me please if the time changed to GMT+1 ???
folks sorry i was reading training and i didnt find anything that specified if 21 minutes of playing counted as playing.
yes it counts as 21minutes of playing obviously..
in terms of training recieved from that you get about 30% of the training you would recieve for playing an entire match probably.. so playing for 90 minutes is best..
or 45 minutes of a league match and 45 minutes of a friendly will give you pretty good results also ;)
in terms of training recieved from that you get about 30% of the training you would recieve for playing an entire match probably.. so playing for 90 minutes is best..
or 45 minutes of a league match and 45 minutes of a friendly will give you pretty good results also ;)
Suppose I buy a player today, and I dont put him in the team on wednesday.
I train Pace, so only players that played during the week will train.
The player I bought played the whole match on sunday with his previous team...
¿will he get Pace training in my team?
I train Pace, so only players that played during the week will train.
The player I bought played the whole match on sunday with his previous team...
¿will he get Pace training in my team?
