Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »Sokker Questions/Answers
I already asked this but there wasnt a serius answer.
I have a GK who played for his U21 NT last friday for 90 minutes, and on saturday also played for the NT for 45 minutes. That means he got around 75% training playing both games?
Thanks again.
I have a GK who played for his U21 NT last friday for 90 minutes, and on saturday also played for the NT for 45 minutes. That means he got around 75% training playing both games?
Thanks again.
there wasnt a serious answer because nobody is sure.. thats a new type of question as U21 is new to the game
you have to get an admin to ask a programmer for that...
but i would guess 75%..sure
you have to get an admin to ask a programmer for that...
but i would guess 75%..sure
I thought training was asymptotic? If that's the case it should be less than 75%
its a greaph like that if you ignore the numbers at side and they run from 0-90% on y and matchtime on x..
or well kinda anyway
I was told (I believe in the Dutch sokker forum) that one full league match + one half friendly still isn't 100%. That's why i think that in the case described above it's less than 75%
(edited)
(edited)
Why do you think so? It doesn't sound 'logic' to me. Because you would 'learn' more when you are tired. Players with low stamina would learn more on the moment they play less good..... (Yes i know it is a game, but still....)
/edit: i believe same model as Kenyard, it is more logic. You learn more when you have much energie and lose the learncapicity by every minute you play.
(edited)
/edit: i believe same model as Kenyard, it is more logic. You learn more when you have much energie and lose the learncapicity by every minute you play.
(edited)
i read the same and it is possible to do that with same model...
the way is simple, you just counts minutes from matches together and 180 = 100% (the only complex thing is the weight of the minutes, but i think it is doable in a model lijke kenyard shows.)
(edited)
the way is simple, you just counts minutes from matches together and 180 = 100% (the only complex thing is the weight of the minutes, but i think it is doable in a model lijke kenyard shows.)
(edited)
NT match = 50% training
1NT match = 50%
plus 45 mins U21 = slightly greater than 25%
there is no friendly mentioned anywhere
1NT match = 50%
plus 45 mins U21 = slightly greater than 25%
there is no friendly mentioned anywhere
The point is that you can't simply add those 2 numbers. Otherwise my example would surely give 100% training
why would it?
example: 30 minutes = 50%, 60 minutes = 70%, 90 minutes = 85%, 120 minutes = 92%, 150 minutes = 97% 180 minutes is 100%
example: 30 minutes = 50%, 60 minutes = 70%, 90 minutes = 85%, 120 minutes = 92%, 150 minutes = 97% 180 minutes is 100%
well we are assuming for 2x NT games you can...
your saying that the second match is 50% of remaining training? so he increases 12.5% more as he played 45 mins?
= 62.5%
as i said.. noone actually knows the proper answer... or so i assume...
your saying that the second match is 50% of remaining training? so he increases 12.5% more as he played 45 mins?
= 62.5%
as i said.. noone actually knows the proper answer... or so i assume...