Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »Sokker Questions/Answers
well we are assuming for 2x NT games you can...
your saying that the second match is 50% of remaining training? so he increases 12.5% more as he played 45 mins?
= 62.5%
as i said.. noone actually knows the proper answer... or so i assume...
your saying that the second match is 50% of remaining training? so he increases 12.5% more as he played 45 mins?
= 62.5%
as i said.. noone actually knows the proper answer... or so i assume...
i agree on 85%
and 75% for friendlies i would think.. maybe even 70%
and 75% for friendlies i would think.. maybe even 70%
Not sure about that either. All I know is that you can't simply add them up.
And hell, this is why we need the topic I'm asking for ;)
And hell, this is why we need the topic I'm asking for ;)
If it is 85% for leaguematch it must be higher then 70% for friendlymatch because of:
"
The differences in training effectiveness resulting from player’s appearances during the week are small. A player who played in one friendly only, will have only slightly less effective training than the one from the first team line-up. The difference is even smaller for a player that played in two games instead of just one."
:)
for me, i believe leaguematch is around 87%, friendly around 82%... but it is based on no evidence or what so ever.
The reason why i believe numbers like this is because the rules say that a clubgame will provide an almost full training. So i think that a friendly game gan not be less effective then around 15 to 17.5% then full training. If it was 20% or more i think the claim in the rules is realy false.
"they will receive near full training by playing 1 match."
(edited)
"
The differences in training effectiveness resulting from player’s appearances during the week are small. A player who played in one friendly only, will have only slightly less effective training than the one from the first team line-up. The difference is even smaller for a player that played in two games instead of just one."
:)
for me, i believe leaguematch is around 87%, friendly around 82%... but it is based on no evidence or what so ever.
The reason why i believe numbers like this is because the rules say that a clubgame will provide an almost full training. So i think that a friendly game gan not be less effective then around 15 to 17.5% then full training. If it was 20% or more i think the claim in the rules is realy false.
"they will receive near full training by playing 1 match."
(edited)
the rules are a pile of crap though as always...
Not that I don't trust Vilpu but in case he won't manage to log in tonight for specifications.. Will a player with injury of 7 days (from today's game) be trained tomorrow? It's been said not but is it confirmed? The player doesn't appear red on the line-up page as it would with a more "normal" injury.
Cheers.
Cheers.
these injury subjects like 8 days without substitution and 7 days but no slight injury have been discussed a long time ago and I don't remember exactly what greg said, but for me it's as sure as confirmed that he won't get training, sorry.
primary lineup was
* 1. B. Bieniuk
* 2. C. Trąbek DEF
* 3. A. Stasiuk DEF
* 4. E. Alexander DEF
* 5. C. Przepióra
* 6. J. Kuzynków
* 7. V. Zahradník
* 8. F. Barbosa MID
* 9. N. Tatlıses
* 10. S. Rolczak
* 11. J. Melchiorsen
* 12. R. Rogala GK
* 13. R. Zaozerskis DEF
* 14. S. Şandru MID
in the match it was:
* 1. B. Bieniuk
* 2. R. Zaozerskis DEF
* 3. S. Şandru DEF
* 4. R. Rogala DEF
* 5. C. Przepióra
* 6. J. Kuzynków
* 7. V. Zahradník
* 9. N. Tatlıses
* 10. S. Rolczak
* 11. J. Melchiorsen
so the MID or DEF orders doesn't matter. engine fiills by the numbers of players
worth to remember
* 1. B. Bieniuk
* 2. C. Trąbek DEF
* 3. A. Stasiuk DEF
* 4. E. Alexander DEF
* 5. C. Przepióra
* 6. J. Kuzynków
* 7. V. Zahradník
* 8. F. Barbosa MID
* 9. N. Tatlıses
* 10. S. Rolczak
* 11. J. Melchiorsen
* 12. R. Rogala GK
* 13. R. Zaozerskis DEF
* 14. S. Şandru MID
in the match it was:
* 1. B. Bieniuk
* 2. R. Zaozerskis DEF
* 3. S. Şandru DEF
* 4. R. Rogala DEF
* 5. C. Przepióra
* 6. J. Kuzynków
* 7. V. Zahradník
* 9. N. Tatlıses
* 10. S. Rolczak
* 11. J. Melchiorsen
so the MID or DEF orders doesn't matter. engine fiills by the numbers of players
worth to remember
I want to sell all my players in the near future, coz of training change... Can som1 help me how to improve profit from the sales, ty alot
he wont indeed get any training. 7 days = not able to be on field = not able to train.
greg naar cometer
sequence is:
(right position)
MID
ATT
DEF
GK
but for goalkeepers I see DEF is checked first so sequence is:
(GK)
DEF
MID
ATT
Seems Greg told the truth for once :p
sequence is:
(right position)
MID
ATT
DEF
GK
but for goalkeepers I see DEF is checked first so sequence is:
(GK)
DEF
MID
ATT
Seems Greg told the truth for once :p
the training update takes place tomorrow morning BEFORE the injury update, so he will miss training :(
456677679
What's the talent of this kid?
Is it 8weeks/5pops = 1.6???!?!?
Impossible right???
(edited)
What's the talent of this kid?
Is it 8weeks/5pops = 1.6???!?!?
Impossible right???
(edited)
If I had my graph on me I could tell you but I don't. It seems likely though that he actually starts near 5 and probably ends at 8.
i think he is around 4-5 week.
but as you can see, Nins opinion is totally different. so nobody knows. :(
we need more week, to say something.
but as you can see, Nins opinion is totally different. so nobody knows. :(
we need more week, to say something.