Subject: »Sokker Questions/Answers

afaik, he has to play

I can not find any statements in the rules about extra visitors when you have an international. Do i look wrong or is it stated somewhere else?

If you have 2 internationals do you get more visitors then when you have one?

afaik Greg never denied it.
And I doubt there is difference between 1 or more.
And the higher attendance isnt 'big', guess like 5%

Ok, thank you :)

it is a news announcement

from long ago, you can still find them all on the front page

it was never introduced i think. there was suggestion as to a number of benefits
(faster injury healing, extra attendance, extra training)

but at least one of them wasnt introduced... not sure which of the first 2.. there may have been another also

it was confirmed in one of those statements he makes occasionally.. a lot of the more knowledgable older users have left in the past year or so though :(
maybe langhe can answer it or some other admin
(edited)

afaik the faster healing was never introduced. The training for sure, and the attendance I'm pretty sure.

I tried this last night with my junior match.

Nothing happened, my keeper played the whole match in midfield and my outfield player played the whole match in goal....I lost 4-1 :)

Conditional orders
Min. Condition / Action
1' always
Maurice Duff on position 1


(edited)

kk.. i knew one of the things that was announced they never got around to doing

LOL, too bad :'D

I'm sure it was on rules, I myself did the translation of it. But I'm just skimming the rules and cannot find them

Note:
is not this, sorry

In rules: 11. The Match - Substitutions

edit: in catalan it is in the but I can't find it in english version of rules (?¿)

IMPORTANT: No pots canviar un porter per un jugador de camp durant el partit excepte si la porteria està buida en aquell moment o bé si el porter està sortint del camp. A més, si per exemple, si canvies un DEF per un ATT conservaran el seu estil de joc!

Here says you can't change a goalkeeper in a field position.
(edited)

its asked like once every 2 weeks.. if you have basic maths (12+ yrs old and do decent math in school)
quite simple really


y = mx + n
y -> number of points that a team will win (os lose if it's negative)
x -> difference of ranking
m -> a constant: -0.02876
n -> depends on the match result, for example:

1-0 -> n=29.29
2-1 -> n=24.16
3-2 -> n=19.54
4-3 -> n=16.79
5-4 -> n=14.93
2-0 -> n=37.59
3-1 -> n=36.09
4-2 -> n=32.02
3-0 -> n=42.14
4-1 -> n=42.14
6-3 -> n=36.93
5-0 -> n=46.61
8-0 -> n=48.95


there is something wrong here, according to this data i was supposed to lose some 3-4 points this morning, but i gained 9.67. if you need all my numbers to check, i can post them tonight, but even with current numbers (after the update) the formula won't be close enough.

do you do decent math?

i doubt that the formula is correct because otherwise i would already have gained ranking points from small losses against teams with a much better ranking. afaik that's never happened.

there's something funny about ranking anyway when i look at the ranking of ranking points in my nation. there are more 2nd league teams in the top rankings instead of the whole first league which you would expect and often the managers who end up as highest are not even the leaders in their leagues. there's even 3 teams from the 3rth league in the top 10.

do you do decent math?

no need to insult me. this kind of math is elementary school, you cannot even call it decent, it's basic. here are the numbers before the match:

my ranking: 3411.31
opponent: 1570.49
x = 1840.82

y = mx + n
y = -0.02876*1840.82 + 48.95
y = -52.94 + 48.95
y = -3.99

so i was supposed to lose points. like i said, i gained. there must be something wrong in the formula and i pointed out the difference hoping somebody with more data and better math than mine can correct it.