Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »Sokker Questions/Answers
in what skill?
seems quite good to me. check the german forum for a comparison then (projekt trainings something or other)
seems quite good to me. check the german forum for a comparison then (projekt trainings something or other)
a typical example of this is training striker for ATT positions. players with MID order get ~50% of normal striker training also
strange i'm training ATT striking for 2 seasons, and none of my mids ever poped up in striking :D
co-traniners:
2xmagical
1x incredible
as reddevil said, players maybe too old.. its 50% training. so for a 20 year old who will pop in 4 weeks, this means he will take 8 weeks with MID order.
when he is 24 that is like 2x longer. instead of 8 weeks its 16 weeks...and times like that are hard to notice.
it only applies to striker training, not tech
when he is 24 that is like 2x longer. instead of 8 weeks its 16 weeks...and times like that are hard to notice.
it only applies to striker training, not tech
Dear Sokker Admins,
I'm writting because I got bored of losing and I have a question. You engine is set up that player would play like in real life or that the team with lower average mark should lose?
Sincerely , Me
I'm writting because I got bored of losing and I have a question. You engine is set up that player would play like in real life or that the team with lower average mark should lose?
Sincerely , Me
Well I'm not admin but it's a balance. Good tactics Vs Bad Tactics can overcome a roughly 10 point average but almost never more than that.
an example where a difference more than 10 points ended up a win for the weaker side :)
And this example is 1 of 1000? or 100000? And I believe "Guatemale" didn't such THING for 3 matches in a row...
Well after the Guatemala match, they lost to Russia,which is also weaker :)
Besides, i've checked your last performances, and i see that you do not fully dominate the opponent(tactically). And i am sure your strikers don't have very high skill in striking. You should take as factors of influence : form, skill of opposite players and your own, also there just may be a short period of unlucky results.
Besides, i've checked your last performances, and i see that you do not fully dominate the opponent(tactically). And i am sure your strikers don't have very high skill in striking. You should take as factors of influence : form, skill of opposite players and your own, also there just may be a short period of unlucky results.
It's not that rare to be quite honest. I know I've pulled off results with a 10 point disadvantage 4 or 5 times at least and it's not terribly difficult but you do need to be facing a manager who is verging on inept.
if i'm not wrong, the engine sets the players comportament by the team ranking/average mark: if you have a team that is lower placed, your players mess the most of the balls. only with super-tactics and lot of luck you can win. when the difference is big, you have no chance. so, moderate your expectations!
fair/unfair - that's an other debate. ;)
fair/unfair - that's an other debate. ;)