Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »Sokker Questions/Answers
That why Im says "~"
O - official match
F - friendly match
NT - NT match
/ - half of match
O+O = 100%!!!
O+F =~97.5
O+/O=~94
O+NT =~94
O+/F=~92
O+/NT =~90
/O+F =~88
NT +F =~88
O = ~ 85
/O+/O =~85
/O+NT =~85
F+/NT=~82.5
/O+/F=~80
NT+/F =~80
F = ~ 75
/O+/NT=~75
/F+/NT =~70
(edited)
O - official match
F - friendly match
NT - NT match
/ - half of match
O+O = 100%!!!
O+F =~97.5
O+/O=~94
O+NT =~94
O+/F=~92
O+/NT =~90
/O+F =~88
NT +F =~88
O = ~ 85
/O+/O =~85
/O+NT =~85
F+/NT=~82.5
/O+/F=~80
NT+/F =~80
F = ~ 75
/O+/NT=~75
/F+/NT =~70
(edited)
time in field influence in the training's efficiency ?
(edited)
(edited)
Abouth this, i would like more opinions, thanks to all
And the reason for that is that 3 assistants with same wage have more trainerpoints (sumskill of all 3 together) then 2 with that wage.
And yes, it has a great influence. But i have no numbers on this moment to prove it. But you'll see soon after you've got them :)
I guide a team that has go from 3*9/10 to 3*14 a couple of weeks ago. I get info from him every week so within around a season i can show you examples ;)
1 example (not very strong, i know :) )
2+11 GT to 7 Tech with 3*9/10 assistants (popped on a not trainingweek)
2+3 to 8 tech with 3*14 assistants
2+0 to 9 tech
And the reason for that is that 3 assistants with same wage have more trainerpoints (sumskill of all 3 together) then 2 with that wage.
And yes, it has a great influence. But i have no numbers on this moment to prove it. But you'll see soon after you've got them :)
I guide a team that has go from 3*9/10 to 3*14 a couple of weeks ago. I get info from him every week so within around a season i can show you examples ;)
1 example (not very strong, i know :) )
2+11 GT to 7 Tech with 3*9/10 assistants (popped on a not trainingweek)
2+3 to 8 tech with 3*14 assistants
2+0 to 9 tech
I give the same advice :)
It's better to have 3x excellent [10] with salary costs of max 18 000 $ for all 3 assistants (max 6 000 $ each), as 2x formidable [11] with salary costs of max 18 000 $ for 2 assistants (max 9 000 $ each).
(edited)
It's better to have 3x excellent [10] with salary costs of max 18 000 $ for all 3 assistants (max 6 000 $ each), as 2x formidable [11] with salary costs of max 18 000 $ for 2 assistants (max 9 000 $ each).
(edited)
I have a question. You have a 23 year old midfielder with 4x brilliant skills and good defending. What 2 seasons of training would be more profitable? 4 midfielder skills or defending?
In my opinion, defender.
You should try to make that guy at least 5x magical.
You should try to make that guy at least 5x magical.
the question isnt about the skills. lets say if you have a player who doesnt have enough talent to reach 5x magical so what would be better(more profitable) training only 4 skills but reaching higher levels or training 5 skills but lower. for example it might be around 5x incredible versus 4x brilliant-magical.
Well, these days a MID player without defender is useless.
Back in time, I would recommend turn him as a wing player, but today's engine doesn't benefit that kind of player anymore, so wingers aren't valued as they used to be.
You said your player already is 4xBri and good at defender. I would train defender for 2 seasons, and then complete with other type of training util he get 4xmagical + outstanding/incredible defender.
Back in time, I would recommend turn him as a wing player, but today's engine doesn't benefit that kind of player anymore, so wingers aren't valued as they used to be.
You said your player already is 4xBri and good at defender. I would train defender for 2 seasons, and then complete with other type of training util he get 4xmagical + outstanding/incredible defender.
Well, these days a MID player without defender is useless.- no it isnt and WC showed it.
out of four semifinalists three played with classic wing. of eight quaterfinal teams 6 of them played with winger...
out of four semifinalists three played with classic wing. of eight quaterfinal teams 6 of them played with winger...
So what do you guys think what would be more valuable(profitable) - MID trained in 4 skills or trained or trained in 5 skills for the same duration?
Ok, maybe I was too extreme at my sentence.
Let me put that way:
Well, these days a MID player without defender is not effective at it was before...
But I maintain the fact that wingers today are much less valued on market.
Let me put that way:
Well, these days a MID player without defender is not effective at it was before...
But I maintain the fact that wingers today are much less valued on market.
well based sole by value I agree that they are not as valued as before so it wouldn't be prfitable to train only wing skills but with smart positioning he could do great job for club.
I don't understand this. I have a 18 year old player who popped 2 to very good(9) passing but he did not popped with 4 trainings to excellent(10) pace playing friendlies. How can that be? For example you take official match 95% of the training so for very good passing he needed 190% and you take 4 friendlies lets say 75% each so that is 300%. It was enough for him to pop to 9 passing with 190% but not enough to pop to 10 pace with 300% ?