Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: »Sokker Questions/Answers

2013-06-05 21:07:15
yeah true. rules are rules.
gameplay is gameplay.
there should be something on tactics editor also.
and a few other things too
2013-06-07 00:58:09
My plus expired yesterday, and I wonder...

...why should I pay for the plus ever again?

As I have got lately the intention of not doing it ever again, because:

- all the interesting features are available (and for free!) by external applications (I guess DEVs like them, as they force us to use them for polls -the facebook thing- and the NTs databases!).

- all the developments seems to be intended to (unsuccessfully) attract new users, while I, who pay, am NOT one of them.

- bugs, work bad/half done, and more bugs are released, without any testing, and I am not being paid for being a betatester (in money, of with extra plus days, for instance), as I am doing *their* job.

- bugs, errors and failures are NOT fixed (and tha feedback and suggestions offered in the forums ignored), while I am *paying* to support the site and ensure that, at least, the things not working can be expected to be fixed sooner or later (but not NEVER).

- DEVs and/or the *masters* of Sokker seem to be commited to give me the impression of depissing and ignoring completely the community, or, alternatively, they seem to be commited to give me not a single clue which could allow me to think the opposite.


So, could somebody point me some valid reason (if it exists) because of which I maybe should reconsider the possibility of paying for plus again without getting at he same time the sensation of being swindled (again)?

Thx :)
(edited)
2013-06-07 13:37:01
I only pay for plus, because it is better for screens. But i agree with you on all complaints, its amazing how little they communicate or programme for that sake, compared to i.e. vman.... i think its a shame, because the basic of the game is supreme compared to others (i think of the tactical editor and match viewer here), and we could have 100.000+ or even sickly higher numbers, if just the devs would do a decent job...
2013-06-07 16:18:27
maybe somebody could buy this whole project ? :D and make it better
2013-06-08 06:52:14
I buy plus to have a flag counter on my club home page. as i'm thinking about it, 30$ per year is absurd!
2013-06-08 07:52:01
For me, sokker is a great game. I pay because i like the game.

And I would realy hate it to not watch other peoples matches. But also associations, store players and teams, stats etc.
2013-06-08 09:57:50
For europeans the price is fair, if there would have been development and communication that is..... but yeah i guess that not as wealthy regions of the world see it as a very high price... Vman takes 30%-40 more, but then again, they work for the money...
2013-06-08 09:59:08
For me, sokker is a great game.

+1...... but it could be way better and there are many bugs...
2013-06-10 20:45:16
How do i get into NT tactics when the osokker addon is bugged at the moment??
2013-06-10 21:15:23
i agree. but if i was paying for plus it would be for the basis that it is improving constantly.
there is so many tiny bugs which are so simple fix but they dont.

this is not argument forum for these types of things anyway so leave it for Q/A or take it to bugs/ideas where people complain about it on a constant basis
2013-06-10 21:16:19
NT, matches, match orders?
you can edit tactics there in the squad section clicking edit no?
2013-06-10 21:25:16
thx, didnt knew of that way in, since im used to the other way... :)
2013-06-13 07:01:18
has the update happened yet? am i the only one?
2013-06-13 07:05:19
No. No .
2013-06-13 07:10:07
You can check it, click on world, and then click on events.
2013-06-13 07:27:44
I think there is a problem about update!