Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »Sokker Questions/Answers
If no one is solving my problem, I would send a mail to all of these options to get it solved.
General training is affected by played position just like normal training(mid order gets less striking, defs&atts get less pass&pm or smth like that) right?
from what i´ve seen with my striker training, the pm/pass pops by gt, has been just as effective on mids as on att, but got no data to back it up as i was late on renewing my plus... (but i trained 3x17 att with 12-9-12 sec, and 17-17-16 att with 11-12-16 sec) and are pretty sure on it...
GT is not affected by positions from what I have seen.
One of my strikers had 4 pops in defender (2-6) and 5 weeks after every defender pop he pops in playmaking (3-7). Another striker raised both defender and passing (9-10) after 30 GT.
Only exception is keeping GT, no matter what position you train only goalies get GT in keeping.
(edited)
One of my strikers had 4 pops in defender (2-6) and 5 weeks after every defender pop he pops in playmaking (3-7). Another striker raised both defender and passing (9-10) after 30 GT.
Only exception is keeping GT, no matter what position you train only goalies get GT in keeping.
(edited)
It looks like the player doesn't have an owner anymore.
As I know he must play 1 match in NT and then he can landed on TL when he is fired.
In this situation I am not sure if is not too late ;/
In this situation I am not sure if is not too late ;/
It is unbelievable players that are fired and players from botteams still don't go to the TL first before permanently deleted !! I'm sure DEVs could change this very easily, so I really don't understand why this still isn't implemented to protect all players, also future NT players.
A few large Sokker countries don't need this protection because they have more then enough juniors and great players, but for all other small(er) countries a few worldclass talents could make the difference for the future of their U21 an NT.
A few large Sokker countries don't need this protection because they have more then enough juniors and great players, but for all other small(er) countries a few worldclass talents could make the difference for the future of their U21 an NT.
Kniaziu you are right - 1 match in NT and only then he can land on TL - thats why i promote juniors from boot team and give them 1 match in NT :)
very sad that some wrong rules never change (Poland doesnt have problem with so many good young players, small countries have big problem)..
Lol charles... if ALL players went to TL, then it would crash market... imagine all the players from the 50.000 teams that are gone, if they all had been to TL
if
'If' didn't happen .... And no, the market would not have crashed, I'm pretty sure about that (opinion vs opinion!). Cheaper players, yes, but that would not have hurt Sokker too much, because for example cheaper players would have been great for new managers. And new managers is something that Sokker really needs. And cheaper players would have made many divisions a lot more competitive as they are today, also great for Sokker. Beside, the market isn't something constant, it always goes up and down. And you forget to mention many of those tl listed players would not have been bought at all, only the most interesting ones, and not all teams where deleted at the same time.
So some managers would not have earned the same as they did with the higher prices, but they also had to buy more expensive players in return.
But the most important thing is, players need to be protected from being deleted permanently without any managers having the change to buy those player.s Managers need to be able to prevent worldclass talents and (future) U21 / NT players from being deleted, ofcourse also when teams become bot. So all players should go to the tl first, just as trainers do. It's not up to 1 manager to end carreers if other managers are still interested to buy those players.
edit
(edited)
'If' didn't happen .... And no, the market would not have crashed, I'm pretty sure about that (opinion vs opinion!). Cheaper players, yes, but that would not have hurt Sokker too much, because for example cheaper players would have been great for new managers. And new managers is something that Sokker really needs. And cheaper players would have made many divisions a lot more competitive as they are today, also great for Sokker. Beside, the market isn't something constant, it always goes up and down. And you forget to mention many of those tl listed players would not have been bought at all, only the most interesting ones, and not all teams where deleted at the same time.
So some managers would not have earned the same as they did with the higher prices, but they also had to buy more expensive players in return.
But the most important thing is, players need to be protected from being deleted permanently without any managers having the change to buy those player.s Managers need to be able to prevent worldclass talents and (future) U21 / NT players from being deleted, ofcourse also when teams become bot. So all players should go to the tl first, just as trainers do. It's not up to 1 manager to end carreers if other managers are still interested to buy those players.
edit
(edited)
Adaca is right. Because the money won't be recycled. The only way that a market would stay healthy, even in virtual world is to recycle it. In this case the money would have gone to bot teams, which would drastically affect the market.
(edited)
(edited)
How and when are national team players released from bot team?
Had a player short while ago that was released, but have no idea how this happened and now I got 2 at U21 Denmark.
(edited)
Had a player short while ago that was released, but have no idea how this happened and now I got 2 at U21 Denmark.
(edited)