Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: WC Qualifications
I don't know how hard it would be, but setting the ranking points of new teams to 0 the day before the qualifications draw, and setting them back to 1500 the day after the qualifications draw doesn't sound that difficult and would result in a much less chaotic system.
I wrote my previous post without reading this one first. I completely agree, of course.
I wrote my previous post without reading this one first. I completely agree, of course.
Disagree with you there, it would lead to a bit of disinflation, not deflation.
I'm not an expert in economics :D , but wouldn't disinflation suggest that the value of a ranking point is already higher then it should be (ie., above the norm)? Whereas deflation means erosion below the norm (which was what I intended)?
We Are happy for the good performance in our first experiance in world cup qualification
Klassifika of group H
----Team--------------- Matches---Wins ---Draws --Losses----Goals----Points
1. Česká republika--------10--------10-------0---------0 -------57-0-------30
2. Hrvatska-----------------10--------8--------0---------2--------53-3-------24
3. [color=#FF0000 size=2 face=arial]Malta[/color] -------------------10--------4--------1---------5-------26-27------13
4. Costa Rica----------------10--------4--------0---------6-------15-22------12
5. Makedonija ---------------10--------3--------1---------6-------6-36-------10
6. Misr ------------------------10--------0--------0--------10------0-69--------0
(edited)
Klassifika of group H
----Team--------------- Matches---Wins ---Draws --Losses----Goals----Points
1. Česká republika--------10--------10-------0---------0 -------57-0-------30
2. Hrvatska-----------------10--------8--------0---------2--------53-3-------24
3. [color=#FF0000 size=2 face=arial]Malta[/color] -------------------10--------4--------1---------5-------26-27------13
4. Costa Rica----------------10--------4--------0---------6-------15-22------12
5. Makedonija ---------------10--------3--------1---------6-------6-36-------10
6. Misr ------------------------10--------0--------0--------10------0-69--------0
(edited)
actually, you are not...
POT A
1. Nederland 101-5 (+96) 30
1. Eesti 100-4 (+96) 30
1. België 93-3 (+90) 30
1. France 84-6 (+78) 30
1. Suomi 76-5 (+71) 30
1. España 73-2 (+71) 30
1. Lietuva 65-7 (+58) 30
1. Česká republika 57-0 (+57) 30
POT B
1. Polska 89-2 (+87) 28
1. România 88-4 (+84) 28
1. Italia 64-10 (+54) 27
1. England 55-9 (+46) 25
1. Argentina 47-3 (+44) 25
2. Brasil 101-8 (+93) 25
2. Slovensko 73-8 (+65) 24
2. Schweiz 66-6 (+60) 24
POT C
2. Chile 69-10 (+59) 24
2. Hrvatska 53-3 (+50) 24
2. Norge 49-7 (+42) 24
2. Deutschland 42-19 (+23) 24
2. USA 63-11 (+52) 22
2. Danmark 56-19 (+37) 22
2. Magyarország 58-14 (+44) 21
2. Slovenija 27-15 (+12) 21
POT D
2. Mexico 32-8 (+24) 19
2. Canada 55-12 (43) 18
3. Sverige 47-20 (+27) 21
3. Portugal 54-10 (+44) 19
3. New Zealand 33-18 (+15) 19
3. Uruguay 50-11 (+39) 18
3. Cymru 47-18 (+29) 18
3. Scotland 33-11 (+22) 18
POT A
1. Nederland 101-5 (+96) 30
1. Eesti 100-4 (+96) 30
1. België 93-3 (+90) 30
1. France 84-6 (+78) 30
1. Suomi 76-5 (+71) 30
1. España 73-2 (+71) 30
1. Lietuva 65-7 (+58) 30
1. Česká republika 57-0 (+57) 30
POT B
1. Polska 89-2 (+87) 28
1. România 88-4 (+84) 28
1. Italia 64-10 (+54) 27
1. England 55-9 (+46) 25
1. Argentina 47-3 (+44) 25
2. Brasil 101-8 (+93) 25
2. Slovensko 73-8 (+65) 24
2. Schweiz 66-6 (+60) 24
POT C
2. Chile 69-10 (+59) 24
2. Hrvatska 53-3 (+50) 24
2. Norge 49-7 (+42) 24
2. Deutschland 42-19 (+23) 24
2. USA 63-11 (+52) 22
2. Danmark 56-19 (+37) 22
2. Magyarország 58-14 (+44) 21
2. Slovenija 27-15 (+12) 21
POT D
2. Mexico 32-8 (+24) 19
2. Canada 55-12 (43) 18
3. Sverige 47-20 (+27) 21
3. Portugal 54-10 (+44) 19
3. New Zealand 33-18 (+15) 19
3. Uruguay 50-11 (+39) 18
3. Cymru 47-18 (+29) 18
3. Scotland 33-11 (+22) 18
I know just a comment :) we have a stong group ,
Better luck next time ;)
Better luck next time ;)
I've always learnt that inflation dealt with total money supply =p
actually, you are not...
Actuallly, he is!
He said that we was happy for his (performance in his) first experience in a WC qualification, he never said that he was happy because they had qualified :P
OK, he forgot to write "performance", but you could understand it though :P
(edited)
Actuallly, he is!
He said that we was happy for his (performance in his) first experience in a WC qualification, he never said that he was happy because they had qualified :P
OK, he forgot to write "performance", but you could understand it though :P
(edited)
thanks friend, your right i forget to right the word performance but now i edit it
Misread it, I thought that he was writing about 1st experience in WC :)
@ borkos007 No Problems now is everything ok ,BTY long time i no see you in facebook whats happen to you borkos007 :)
I'm ending them currently, everything graded with 4 till now, with philosophy 5 :)