Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: Profurgol

2009-05-09 07:44:05
Finaly xD
2009-05-09 08:19:48
Again xD
2009-05-09 09:30:24
Josli, maybe you wanna little friendly this season (after Cup) here =) ? I whould learn you one or two things how to play manager games xD
2009-05-09 09:31:24
Btw, today should be anounced 13TH ProFurgol Language - Lithuanian ;) !!!
2009-05-09 11:38:59
Congratz! :D
2009-05-09 13:14:45
Sadly Pedro is delaying this anouncment ://
2009-05-10 10:59:50
Of course I am always open to learn new things :-)
2009-05-16 13:22:02
Dont talk Lithuanian Peoples
(edited)
2009-05-16 13:37:37
His was 34, yours 33, so whats the problem? It was equal teams, someone had to win and someone to loose.
2009-05-16 13:38:59
Btw he played at home, so had home advantage, he had more possesion and attacking players got some boost too.
2009-05-16 13:59:38
Your adversary had more possession, his central attack was stronger than your central defense, his defense was equal to your central attack.
That are the reasons, why I don't understand your complaints. You desserved to lose... :P
2009-05-16 14:21:58
No,this was the problem:
Min.34, It seems that Rodrigo Priorio has some physical problem, since he is lying down on the pitch. Min.35, The medical services of the club continue treating to Rodrigo Priorio, and everything points to be injured, the injury is Injured Meniscus . This small injury will not prevent him to finish the match within the field, but everything indicates that he is acting with more heart than head, his team will surely notice a small sharp decline and it may be definitive during the match. The player Rodrigo Priorio demonstrates not to think very much about his team, he is only touched with a small injury, but he has said to his trainer that he wants to continue in the pitch in spite of the fact that he will not be able to give good results to ceiling.
So in fact there was:
Central Attack High good + Midfield Good against your Centre back Good * + Midfield Low passable *.
Your midfield players were much too weak (and much more after your left mid has been injured) and 2 of your attackers (left and right) didn't play as central attackers, that's why you have lost this match.
2009-05-16 17:23:30
didn't play as central attackers, that's why you have lost this match?



:/

tenacius & manhil buhaha bla bla bla.... Alf true
(edited)
2009-05-16 18:52:36
???

Maybe you should stop that right now, you're getting rude.

And yes, now I see that. Striker on wing... That wasn't the best tactical decision...

But you're telling me, that what I say is wrong? I can't believe that.

Let's look at your case (both attack through center). You can't expect to win, if:
- you have less possession than the opponent,
- the opponent's central attack is better than your central defense,
- your central attack is as good as his central defense.
And btw, I don't think the 2 strikers with wrong order made such a difference. With only 38% possession, and a defense worse than the opposite attack, you wouldn't have won either.
2009-05-16 18:58:30
xD when will you be as half as good and experienced as me at that game, then you can laugh xD
2009-05-16 20:04:25
Whahahahhahahahaha...???