Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »Climate Change and Global Warming
higher temperature of air in general results in more moisture in it.
it leads to more rain, snow and increase the risk of heavy flooding
(edited)
it leads to more rain, snow and increase the risk of heavy flooding
(edited)
the Sun's influence on climate = 99.999%
Man-made climate change, co2(99% of which comes from oceans) & all the other crap = 0.001%
simple: cause and effect
Its not the exhaust pipe thats causing the polution, its the enigine!!!
There is nothing humans can do to stop the forces of changing nature, unless you want to stop the sun, that is. PS: Good luck with global warming or cooling rubbish... if you want to(like to) worry, try to predict the next 'revarsal of the poles' or the 'geomagnetic pole reversal' of the earth.
(edited)
Man-made climate change, co2(99% of which comes from oceans) & all the other crap = 0.001%
simple: cause and effect
Its not the exhaust pipe thats causing the polution, its the enigine!!!
There is nothing humans can do to stop the forces of changing nature, unless you want to stop the sun, that is. PS: Good luck with global warming or cooling rubbish... if you want to(like to) worry, try to predict the next 'revarsal of the poles' or the 'geomagnetic pole reversal' of the earth.
(edited)
sun's influence on climate might be much larger than the human influence, but that doesn't mean that this is the same for the influence on the change in climate.
lol
dude, please stop make an ass of Yourself, ok?
You have mixed two totally diferent things: influence on climate and climate change and added them to 100%. That logic is crap!
The Sun is the major donator of energy and because of that we can say that his influence on climate is so high however his activity is steady since decades!
But we are talking about climate change and we know that nor solar, oceanic or volcanic activity have any impact on this change:
btw: (99% of which comes from oceans) is another BS
see by Yourself that oceans CO2 concentration is still rising:
oceans absorbs around half of human CO2 emisions!
(edited)
dude, please stop make an ass of Yourself, ok?
You have mixed two totally diferent things: influence on climate and climate change and added them to 100%. That logic is crap!
The Sun is the major donator of energy and because of that we can say that his influence on climate is so high however his activity is steady since decades!
But we are talking about climate change and we know that nor solar, oceanic or volcanic activity have any impact on this change:
btw: (99% of which comes from oceans) is another BS
see by Yourself that oceans CO2 concentration is still rising:
oceans absorbs around half of human CO2 emisions!
(edited)
This is exactly the ignorance I was writing about .... May I ask what your academic degree is, that you know this all much better then most scientists and people working with nature??
Can you explain to me what the scandal was at the end of the summit in Copenhagen? I heard there was a fuss about fraud with statistics, but I never heard anything further about it.
I suppose You are talking about cracked emails from CRU (Climat Research Unit) where few sentences may lead by purposed manipulation to conclusions that scientists were falsifing outputs of their studies...
trully, some of them includes many faux pas, but nothing important to the case
obviously it was only a medial scam
however investigation was started to ensure public opinion that everything was right
few days ago was published a report from this investigation. it's avilable here:
http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/phil%20jones%20house%20of%20commons%20report.pdf
all acusations turn out to be unsubstantiated
(edited)
trully, some of them includes many faux pas, but nothing important to the case
obviously it was only a medial scam
however investigation was started to ensure public opinion that everything was right
few days ago was published a report from this investigation. it's avilable here:
http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/phil%20jones%20house%20of%20commons%20report.pdf
all acusations turn out to be unsubstantiated
(edited)
i must sadly admit that in Poland condition about climatic topics knowledge is dramatically low and it doesn't depend too much from academic degree or any other status
quality of our media is tragic in this matter
they release a controversial climate news all the time to increase their popularity
it brings a lot of confusions in public opinion and create a very "sceptical climat" in our society... :/
quality of our media is tragic in this matter
they release a controversial climate news all the time to increase their popularity
it brings a lot of confusions in public opinion and create a very "sceptical climat" in our society... :/
I agree with you at some level. I think the global warming is a huge hoax
read "The Emperor's New Clothes" a short tale by Hans Christian Andersen and you will understand
I like this kind of one-sided scepticism that at the same time assumes that everybody on the other side of the arguement is an idiot:)
@ChuckNorris than I have something for you.. ;-)
@grzesbe & Charles Hill
lol, first of all I would like to state (for the record) that I am not denying "climate change",
nor, I am denying "Global Warming" effects (like the graphs you posted), I am only denying its causes, supposably human made CO2 related causes (a stated in the IPCC global warming later climate change rubbish reports). The term "Global Warming" has lots all its meaning now... as any climate change is "Global Warming" news, and usually its made out to be a a disastrous event or problem which needs all the taxpayers money to be solved immediately by (pseudo)scientists.
Nowdays any floating iceberg on the oceans is made out to be a "2012"-movie type event in our media or our imaginations... which 'of course' is caused by our excessive deodorant use.... ;-p
enough of this please... remember titanic... floating ice in the arctic ocean is no news. Its been happening for a long long time... thousands of years... only we didn't have cameras everywhere to realise it. Same with most of the new!! astounding!!! "scientific" data!!!... proof for "Global Warming".
...please, give me the full picture... of lets say the CO2 emmisions from the last ice age for example... or at least from the last millenium... before you make a oustanding claim of "Global Warming"/climate change problem (call it what you like), ...money money money...
If you missed the lower part of my very short statement... I will copy the important bit:
"There is nothing humans can do to stop the forces of changing nature, unless you want to stop the sun, that is..."
regarding this:
"You have mixed two totally diferent things: influence on climate and climate change and added them to 100%. That logic is crap!"
- few words about "my logic", lol...
the Sun's influence on climate = 99.999%
Man-made climate change, co2 & all the other crap = 0.001%
- and now:
the Sun's climate change = 99.999%
Man-made influence on climate, co2 & all the other crap = 0.001%
- spot the difference. ;-p
If this confused you, its probably my mistake (sorry), I meant the same thing by the use of these different words,
the Sun's influence on climate change = 99.999%
Man-made influence on climate change, co2 & all the other crap = 0.001%
...much better. :-D
and best for last, this truly blew me away:
"The Sun is the major donator of energy and because of that we can say that his influence on climate is so high however his activity is steady since decades!"
yes, the sun's activity is veeerrry steady... lol, and has nothing to do with, the planets climate change 'global warming', I know... its just this lovely life giving spec in the sky, forget about the "other side"... very steady and unifluential.
PS: how could I forget: important graphs, and a little comedy
and more, a little bit more seriously: 1of5
and a second, better one: 1of6
ice age is comming!
(edited)
@grzesbe & Charles Hill
lol, first of all I would like to state (for the record) that I am not denying "climate change",
nor, I am denying "Global Warming" effects (like the graphs you posted), I am only denying its causes, supposably human made CO2 related causes (a stated in the IPCC global warming later climate change rubbish reports). The term "Global Warming" has lots all its meaning now... as any climate change is "Global Warming" news, and usually its made out to be a a disastrous event or problem which needs all the taxpayers money to be solved immediately by (pseudo)scientists.
Nowdays any floating iceberg on the oceans is made out to be a "2012"-movie type event in our media or our imaginations... which 'of course' is caused by our excessive deodorant use.... ;-p
enough of this please... remember titanic... floating ice in the arctic ocean is no news. Its been happening for a long long time... thousands of years... only we didn't have cameras everywhere to realise it. Same with most of the new!! astounding!!! "scientific" data!!!... proof for "Global Warming".
...please, give me the full picture... of lets say the CO2 emmisions from the last ice age for example... or at least from the last millenium... before you make a oustanding claim of "Global Warming"/climate change problem (call it what you like), ...money money money...
If you missed the lower part of my very short statement... I will copy the important bit:
"There is nothing humans can do to stop the forces of changing nature, unless you want to stop the sun, that is..."
regarding this:
"You have mixed two totally diferent things: influence on climate and climate change and added them to 100%. That logic is crap!"
- few words about "my logic", lol...
the Sun's influence on climate = 99.999%
Man-made climate change, co2 & all the other crap = 0.001%
- and now:
the Sun's climate change = 99.999%
Man-made influence on climate, co2 & all the other crap = 0.001%
- spot the difference. ;-p
If this confused you, its probably my mistake (sorry), I meant the same thing by the use of these different words,
the Sun's influence on climate change = 99.999%
Man-made influence on climate change, co2 & all the other crap = 0.001%
...much better. :-D
and best for last, this truly blew me away:
"The Sun is the major donator of energy and because of that we can say that his influence on climate is so high however his activity is steady since decades!"
yes, the sun's activity is veeerrry steady... lol, and has nothing to do with, the planets climate change 'global warming', I know... its just this lovely life giving spec in the sky, forget about the "other side"... very steady and unifluential.
PS: how could I forget: important graphs, and a little comedy
and more, a little bit more seriously: 1of5
and a second, better one: 1of6
ice age is comming!
(edited)
Well, I must say I'm glad you came with an argument why you THINK it's not true.
But you could have used that time to spend on other things in stead of telling us more oilcompany-lobby lies and the outcome of studies by a handfull of sceptic scientists (paid by this companies) ....
Here is a nice link to an article: "Most Credible" Climate Skeptic Revealed to Receive Funding from Big Polluters
Believe the world is flat because a handfull of scientists still saying that! ;) (I think you know what I'm trying to say ..)
The only thing I think you're right about is that the warning of global warming is loosing it's meaning because companies use the term 'green' whenever it can make them look better and earn more money. But that doesn't make global warming is not true, only 'dumb' people stop believing it's true.
But you could have used that time to spend on other things in stead of telling us more oilcompany-lobby lies and the outcome of studies by a handfull of sceptic scientists (paid by this companies) ....
Here is a nice link to an article: "Most Credible" Climate Skeptic Revealed to Receive Funding from Big Polluters
Believe the world is flat because a handfull of scientists still saying that! ;) (I think you know what I'm trying to say ..)
The only thing I think you're right about is that the warning of global warming is loosing it's meaning because companies use the term 'green' whenever it can make them look better and earn more money. But that doesn't make global warming is not true, only 'dumb' people stop believing it's true.
"There is nothing humans can do to stop the forces of changing nature, unless you want to stop the sun, that is..."
have You ever heard about greenhouse effect and the basic mechanism of it - radiative forcings of greenhouse gases??
it seems You haven't and I would be gratefull if You could read about it even in Wiki before next "rubbish" statements here...
yes, the sun's activity is veeerrry steady... lol, and has nothing to do with, the planets climate change 'global warming', I know... its just this lovely life giving spec in the sky, forget about the "other side"... very steady and unifluential.
another example of mixing two differents things: influence on climate and influence on climate change
so how will You explain the fact that global temperature is rising extremely fast in last 3 decades and solar irradiance since 1975 (begining os satelites observations) is steady?
please explain how can this steady sun activity be a cause of increasing global temperature??:
(all data are taken from official site of Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), NASA)
(edited)
read "The Emperor's New Clothes" a short tale by Hans Christian Andersen and you will understand
WOW .. that's a great argument (?)
WOW .. that's a great argument (?)