Subject: United States: Election Time

Your right, I forgot to mention 2 other groups and a specific voters-area which will be informed. First group are the average and lower income but very dumb white middle-age christians who will pay for the tax cut the Republicans want to give to the rich so they have to pay only 1% taxes, and the second group are the racists, homofobics and other morally wrong. And ofcourse as much as possible only Republican areas as this voter ID law has to be an advantage for Romney and not Obama.

Btw, strange you only take out that line and not something you always write about, like government intervention and corrupcy, freedom and democracy! I wonder why ...........

(edited)

Actually, I didn't read anything about that ID law. I reacted on that specific line because I fear you believe the stereotypes you have. Which you have proven by this comment.

I don't know how stereotyping it is. Do you think for example the pvv and vlaamsblok (now vb) will spend a lot of effort in getting Dutch and Belgium muslims to vote for their party? But that's not even the point, the point is should these political parties be able to make it more difficult for these Dutch and Belgium muslims to vote, with the help of judges and pro-party supporters whose responsibility it is to inform these Dutch and Belgium muslims, and who are appointed by these same political parties? Is that called democratic? This should be against everything you stand for, knowing your political views.

And not knowing about the law and posting a comment about it is a bit strange if you ask me. If you look at the groups of people that are effected by this voter ID law and the states in which this law is introduced, it's almost impossible to reject this by simply calling it stereotyping.

If you want to be informed more and in a funny way, just watch some episodes of The Colbert Report and The Daily Show. If you like humor and politics, probably you will like these shows too. And to link it with your ideologies, both are pretty much libertarians, looking at their political views Stephen Colbert is a bit more neutral while Jon Stewart is more anti-Romney, but both are anti-Fox.

http://www.colbertnation.com/

http://www.thedailyshow.com/

It's not about Charles' stereotypes, but the voting probability and statistics, please be reasonable ;)

the invisible army

gov's changes... facts doesn't.
(edited)

+1

I was watching news and there was that US election thing,they asked citizens who'll they vote for...one women said:"I'll vote for Mitt Romney cause Obama is a liar.He said there will be no war,and it still is.At least Romney said that it would be war,and we go to kill some bastards"

I was shocked...Voting for someone who wants to go and kill ppl?But then I realized...They have no 2nd choice...either it's war,or war...and looks like they don't mind it at all :/

They do have a choice. Vote Gary Johnson.

Yea,but race is between obama and romney...personally,I haven't heard in media about johnson...propaganda is evil ;)

personally,I haven't heard in media about johnson

Same here.

New poll :-)

What about the other candidates?

Breaking news, they won't stand a chance anyway.

What's the point of a poll (who do you support?) if you don't include all candidates? It's like asking: who do you want to be the next prime minister of the UK, and then only giving Cameron and Miliband as choices.
(edited)

I thought it's a poll about who we think will win :)