Subject: Pmanager

Sure - but then you've to wait for 30 days ;o)

Actually if you look at the Office and go to the 2nd page you're able to see the news concerning the new leagues.

"As we told a few days ago, the change we''ve made on schedules would allow us to expand some PM nations but also to create new ones.
We are pleased to announce that we''ll soon add 6 new countries to our world. All of them will start with 2 divisions only (50 teams). Here they are:
Ireland
Slovakia
Malta
Iceland
Faroe Islands
New Zealand

If you are based on one of these 6 countries you''ll be allowed to change to your home country. However you''ll have to start with a new team. To confirm the change you just have to visit this page: http://s1.pmanager.org/league_change.asp | http://s2.pmanager.org/league_change.asp (depending on your current server), chose the country and set your new team name (it can be the current name you''re using). You have until the 16th of this month to confirm the change. The leagues will be created most likely on the next day."

thank you so much :)

Cool I am in Slovakia :) now we are 4

and 4 in waiting list =P

Just play sokker and no other crap

And waiting for only two games in a week ? :D I must do something anytime :)

:)

Sokker is very interesting and a very great game, but certainly is not very tactical. I think it's much more of who has the better players. The Brasilian National Cup Winner has beat all of his opponents without never suffering a goal with the same tactic (that I don't think it's so great). Against his great players, no tactic have worked. The National League leader didn't suffer a goal either. If he looses a match will be because of bad lucky. With a weaker team, sometimes there is nothing you can do in Sokker to beat a stronger team. It's very clear that in most cases nothing can be done (about tactical choices) to avoid been beat by some stronger team.

Sokker is also a great game and will certainly succed in grow in the future, but I prefer games that provide us with more tactical possibility of beating stronger teams and I think PM give us this possibility. I have won a much better team there because I predict his tactic and made good tactical choices, but here, with many tactical experiments I already did has showed that it's much, but much more hard to defeat stronger teams with tactical choices in Sokker.

I think that's my advice for those that might want to try a different game.
(edited)

All the games i lost or draw were with a bot teams much weaker than i am...

But I don't think you lost or draw those games because the bots have made good tactical choices to beat your team.

I guess u are little lost in Sokker man, U say thats its most impossible o beat strongest teams in sokker and that there is few tatict Moves in sokker... I would say that u are tottaly wrong.

Sokker is not about raking things, in sokker you must work out with taticts, positions os the players and also their skills well worked to the right place in the field.
I just hv one question, when u say in sokker we cannot beat strongest teams (I win and also many of us), when you say that u say that... u never beat them or usualy you dont beat them?

If never (thats not true)
If Often (if its a strongest team thats normal u dont win them normaly right?)
I dont fear strongest team I just need to know they weak point(s) and try to use it... Sometimes I win sometimes I lose... I guess its normal

And About PM , I dont play Sokker Makes My day :)
I can´t see another WORDS game... Or hv 3D and better then sokker ... or... No time to waste!

Please just stop to say that sokker is not this and hv not that...
Its the best game online of Soccer.. PERIOD!

U say thats its most impossible o beat strongest teams in sokker and that there is few tatict Moves in sokker...

I never said that. You should read again my posts.

when u say in sokker we cannot beat strongest teams

I didn't say stronger teams can’t be beat. I said that, in my opinion, there is much more possibility to beat stronger teams with good tactical choices in PM. You seem to have misunderstood everything that I said.

Please just stop to say that sokker is not this and hv not that...

I know it's hard for some people to accept other people's opinion. But first, if you read again my posts you will realise that I didn't compared these two games and said that PM is better. I never said that. I didn't deny any of the good points of Sokker, because I like both games if you haven't noticed. What I did is to show a good point of PM that Sokker has much less (the possibility of beating stronger teams with smart tactical choices), as Sokker has good points that PM doesn't have. They are different.

But I think even if I did compared and said the one you like is not the best, that would be my opinion and I think you should learn to accept other people's opinion and not use that kind of tone.

I can't see how weak teams beating a lot stronger teams is a selling point of a game really. It's not realistic. Exactly how often do, for example, non league teams in England beat premiership teams?

Not very often at all.

Anyway, I do have a team in PM and certainly prefer SK to it. Although the game does have it's merits, but there doesn't seem to be much to explore - it's all handed to you on a plate which makes the game less interesting in my opinion. Seems to be along the lines of the Championship Manager 3 and earlier games really.

Your opinion has no importance to me!!!!
Starting from there I accept any opinion of yours with no problem, and My tune IS not tune at all :)
If you think I am writing with a bad tune... I will play Guns n Roses song to put some good tunes in my writing :)) heehehehehehe

And I end saying that you ARE RIGHT (now I am being a good guy) there are place for both games and many games...
But I still not getting that view of beating Strongest teams COMPARITION... But I will leave it behind... tune problems :))))

I didn't say stronger teams can’t be beat. I said that, in my opinion, there is much more possibility to beat stronger teams with good tactical choices in PM. You seem to have misunderstood everything that I said.

And what is involved in making good tactical choices in PM? How many tactical options are there and what do they consist of?

I disagree a bit with what mr_gibbage is saying, plenty of upsets in reality. The way tactics are here in Sokker would tend to minimize that, especially when there's a bigger disparity between teams, but I'm not too convinced smaller teams can't get the better of bigger teams.

And what is involved in making good tactical choices in PM? How many tactical options are there and what do they consist of?

The tactical part of the game isn't simple to explain in few words. There are tactics (formations, type of pass and style of play) and advanced tactics (where you choose to make pressure or not, and how to make pressure, way of defence and how they are going to stop the forwards and so on) that means a combination of player's skills that make them a great team against determinated opponents.

Of course you still need players with certain skills but you can have weaker players and still defeat stronger teams playing better. It's not easy as it seems and it's not very common, but there is a good possibility for smart managers to make smart moves and beat them.

For example, In Sokker I've played once against a stronger team that did off-side trap. His players were very good bad he didn't positioned them very well. Still I lost a good time and edited a tactic to my forward have many balls in one to one with the keeper. He recieved many balls but his players always ran a lot more than my players and stole the ball from behind all the time very easily. I've watched this game many times and I've seen no tactical change at all I could do to win this game. That's one thing I miss this chance in Sokker.

edit: But please, I also like this game a lot, don't misunderstood me. Also I can be wrong about that and realise that later, that's just my opinion right now.
(edited)