Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: what appeared first?
Actually that is mainstream. All scientists agree birds are dinosaurs and Wikipedia also says birds are dinosaurs. If Wikipedia isn't mainstream than I don't know what is.
It's clear that a chicken's egg means an egg laid by a chicken, but about a chicken egg I'm not that sure (that we all will agree).
(edited)
(edited)
What a stupid dilemma and a pointless topic
(edited)
(edited)
it´s not pointless
but if you don´t like eggs, you can do it another way
for example the first romanian didn´t have romanian parents
but if you don´t like eggs, you can do it another way
for example the first romanian didn´t have romanian parents
Well, you're actually wrong since Adam and Eve were both Romanian. God created the Romanians!
:P
:P
They surely were not, they were inhabitants of Eden! :P ;)
Oh and no dilemma here. First was the "animal" that did not lie eggs, then (mutation/selection) came the first chicken that did lie eggs, then came the first egg. So first was the chicken.
(edited)
Oh and no dilemma here. First was the "animal" that did not lie eggs, then (mutation/selection) came the first chicken that did lie eggs, then came the first egg. So first was the chicken.
(edited)
"What a stupid dilemma and a pointless topic"
+1
I wish we´d have the red arrows...
+1
I wish we´d have the red arrows...
Well, some people don' t like philosophy on football manager forums ;]
Chicken
someone told me once that adan and eva was here at the earth the same ocurred with the chicken, god create the animals and human beings and ALL the shit that we know now at the present, so the sex and reproduction came later ;)
someone told me once that adan and eva was here at the earth the same ocurred with the chicken, god create the animals and human beings and ALL the shit that we know now at the present, so the sex and reproduction came later ;)
Yeah, one guy once told me that he believes in God's creation of world, that Adam and Eva were the first one's...and he still believes in evolution and dinosaurs...[']
believing in evolution is religious too, because it suggests an aim, but there isn´t.
Evolution doesn't have an aim and there is neither a suggested aim. I don't know what you're talking about, but evolution has already been proven. It's most definitely not religious, but scientific.
And if you say "evolution does not exist" then please tell me how many dog races you see nowadays and please tell me how many there were 500 years before.
And if you say "evolution does not exist" then please tell me how many dog races you see nowadays and please tell me how many there were 500 years before.