Subject: »Gaza sea convoy incident

WTF ???????????????????????????
incite a rebellion, and then you wonder why fight back?

Actually all we've seen is footage released by the IDF. I'd like to see a continuous play of the events of what happened.

Also, in

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jun/01/gaza-flotilla-eyewitness-accounts-gunfire

eyewitnesses say that the IDF fired first, then attacked with >10 boats and helicopters.

so we finally agree that they r not peace makers but rebellions?

Yeah they were rebelling with knives and wooden handles and screwdrivers and cds which you will NEVER find on a ship.

They breached a blockade thus it was a 'legal' action.

Jup i saw the weapons: those were goddamn knifes, daggers and machetes! Didn't see any guns on the pics in my newspaper. How can a well-trained army as the israelian army consider that as a main threat?

"Peace activists" how declared intentions of peace do not attack soldiers.
The soldiers have not put one foot up on deck and were attacked with iron bars and knives

Again, I present to you

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jun/01/gaza-flotilla-eyewitness-accounts-gunfire

where eyewitness accounts state that the IDF fired before attempting to board.

Also, this attack was on a neutral vessel in international waters. How about that?

We fired into the air as is common in international law when the ship was asked to return to the trail

as is common in international law

I hate to break it to you, but sending military vessels to attack neutral civilian vessels on the high seas is not common in international law.

In fact, it's illegal and tantamount to an act of war.

And by eyewitness you mean - we HEARD the gunshots over our portable radio... We WERE TOLD by...

The attack on the Mavi Marmara came in an instant: they attacked it with 12 or 13 attack boats and also with commandos from helicopters. We heard the gunshots over our portable radio handsets, which we used to communicate with the Mavi Marmara, because our ship communication system was disrupted. There were three or four helicopters also used in the attack. We were told by Mavi Marmara their crew and civilians were being shot at and windows and doors were being broken by Israelis.

Otherwise I see "only" teargass and plastic bullets.

An israeli government website trying to justify israeli actions? Colour me surprised!

+1

Nobody atacked them till they did , we only want to check that the ship don't carry weapon to shoot on Israely civilians as they did for 8 years !

So We were told by Mavi Marmara their crew and civilians were being shot at and windows and doors were being broken by Israelis isn't good enough?

also,

"Suddenly from everywhere we saw inflatables coming at us, and within seconds fully equipped commandos came up on the boat. They came up and used plastic bullets, we had beatings, we had electric shocks, any method we can think of, they used."

When the israelis release the illegally detained passengers of the ships we will get a better report of what happened.

Besides, even if the IDF used water-filled balloons as ammunition, it was still a highly illegal act to use military vessels to attack neutral civilian ships in international waters.

Nobody atacked them till they did

Yeah but that's not what eyewitness reports are saying. All your information is also from a nicely timed release of a video on youtube designed to exaggerate the situation.

Also, I didn't know Turkey, the UK, Norway, and Greece have been firing at Israeli civilians for 8 years. It's a wonder you're still alive!

I hope you did not buy anything from Israel, those first Most suffer from thus action will be the Arabs living in Israel that lost their jobs and the Palestinians that come to work in Israel .
We Jews will manage ;)

:) u are funny

(edited)