Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
 Topic closed!!!

Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD

2011-05-03 16:25:39
So you really think they are not capable of doing such awful things to their own people ?

I never said that, so I don't need to answer. Try reading what I said, it might help you in discussions in the future.
We still have to find Wally :o
?
2011-05-03 17:13:04
Some people here are so dumb and stupid is not worth replying.

If I'm stupid then what are the people who trust country which nuked 1 million civilians, napalm-bombed Vietnamese civil villages, country whose Joint Chiefs approved killing own people to justify attacking Cuba, probably killed their own president, the people who re-elected Bush etc. ?
2011-05-03 17:19:35
All of which you said is either wrongly presented or plain nonsense. Take Pearl harbour for example. Japan was not provoked in any way. No need, either - the Japanese were spoiling for a fight. And Pearl Harbour could not have been allowed to remain. Did people know about the possibility of the coming attack? Definitely. Does that make it a deliberate sacrafice? No. The Americans got caught with their pants down, just like everyone else in the Pacific.

Just a suggestion, check your facts and look for unbiased information. A small hint: 99.99% of all free information on the internet is biased in one way or another.

Even if said things were true, these 'historical facts' - quod non - are in no way relevant for anything else at a later date, with different people in power in a completely different situation. For instance, the Dutch government tortured people routinely in the 17th century. Proven fact. Doesn't mean the same thing happens today.

At all conspiracy theory people: stop being so gullible. Thank you.
2011-05-03 17:21:34
it was a controlled demolition?

Using what? If these buildings are just totally unbreakable? And when would the explosives have been put there? After the plane went into the building? Thats impossible. Before they did? Yet noone saw any explosives (despite you saying it must have been a big operation over many days) and the plane going in never set them off? The buildings fell from top down. There's no evidence of what you are saying.
2011-05-03 17:22:56
Just a suggestion, check your facts and look for unbiased information. A small hint: 99.99% of all free information on the internet is biased in one way or another.

Do not forget that all History is the history of the winners... Thus, all information are biased... Do not be so naive ;-)
2011-05-03 17:25:26
in this day and age not so. With all the technology, recording, videos, microchips etc, its all there for you to make your mind up.

Hackers, leaks, etc, there's no way that a cover up this big could remain a secret for so long.
2011-05-03 17:26:37
It is your view ;-)
2011-05-03 17:30:36
why most of people working there has been out of that building that day :)?

There are more ways how to make controlled demolision, i was not there :)

you can use also that variant with fire, if you use also suitable explosive materials, not only plane. Read more about it on internet, i am not expert too, i am just working with them :)
2011-05-03 17:30:47
well its a view that cant be proved wrong by current evidence.
2011-05-03 17:39:00
well its a view that cant be proved wrong by current evidence.

You biased your answer as well ;-)

As you can also said :

"well its a view that cant be proved right by current evidence." with the same evidence ;-)
2011-05-03 17:41:44
There was a lot of traffic jams and problems on trains that prevented people getting to the towers, plus the first plane hit at 8.45 which is very early. A lot wouldnt have been due for work yet, you see the first attack, you aint going to go into the building. People evacuated the building when the first attack happened, the majority on the lower floors would have easily been able to escape before the tower falls down.
2011-05-03 17:43:32
well it is, because the evidence thats there shows it to be correct. You just believe that evidence is biased, a conspiracy or flawed. Its your opinion that stops my opinion being right in your mind.
2011-05-03 17:46:43
well it is, because the evidence thats there shows it to be correct. You just believe that evidence is biased, a conspiracy or flawed. Its your opinion that stops my opinion being right in your mind.

I can eaesily write :

"well it is, because the information given to you thats there shows it to be correct. You just believe that evidence is unbiased, a lonely thruth or perfect. Its your opinion that stops my opinion being right in your mind."
2011-05-03 17:53:02
well no because you have no evidence. Its called a conspiracy THEORY for a reason. Its there to see that the planes went into the building and the buildings fell down. Its not there to see that the us govt put explosives in the building and blew it up.