Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD
well no because you have no evidence. Its called a conspiracy THEORY for a reason. Its there to see that the planes went into the building and the buildings fell down. Its not there to see that the us govt put explosives in the building and blew it up.
Did i write anything thaht you tied to explain to me ? No... You biased information my friend ;-)
How is that biased information?
PLANES FLEW INTO THE TWIN TOWERS. FACT!
PLANES FLEW INTO THE TWIN TOWERS. FACT!
Do not forget that all History is the history of the winners... Thus, all information are biased... Do not be so naive ;-)
I'm a student of history and let me assure you one thing: history is written by historians. Over and over again. And let me tell you one thing, we like to do reasearch. We do not like tainted sources, unless we can use them in a reliable way. (For instance, a book written by Ceasar is pure propaganda, but we can still use it to learn about Latin.)
And geographical or cultural facts for a bit :)
But it's remarkable that we know so little about the german soldiers their vision on the war and so much about the american vision.
But it's remarkable that we know so little about the german soldiers their vision on the war and so much about the american vision.
Actually, we do know a lot about the Germans. That is to say, the sources are there to be used. Historians who write to be read by the public need to sell their books, however. It's only very recently that some people have become mildy interested in the German side of things.
Of course, the nature and availability of sources is enormously affected by the outcome of such things like wars. This doesn't equal the old saying that history is written by victors. Obviously, no historian is completely free of bias and mistakes are almost guaranteed. But, serious work is subjected to peer review and part of academical debate.
Of course, the nature and availability of sources is enormously affected by the outcome of such things like wars. This doesn't equal the old saying that history is written by victors. Obviously, no historian is completely free of bias and mistakes are almost guaranteed. But, serious work is subjected to peer review and part of academical debate.
How is that biased information?
Yes it is obviously biased information because i did not ever write anything opposite of what you explained : PLANES FLEW INTO THE TWIN TOWERS. FACT!
Please read carefully what i said, thus you'll understand.
Yes it is obviously biased information because i did not ever write anything opposite of what you explained : PLANES FLEW INTO THE TWIN TOWERS. FACT!
Please read carefully what i said, thus you'll understand.
sorry but i dont.
You say my opinion isnt right because the evidence i use is biased.
So why is it biased evidence? Noone can claim that planes didnt fly into the towers, because its a fact, so you're saying that it can never be an unbiased fact? It just doesnt make the slightest bit of sense.
You say my opinion isnt right because the evidence i use is biased.
So why is it biased evidence? Noone can claim that planes didnt fly into the towers, because its a fact, so you're saying that it can never be an unbiased fact? It just doesnt make the slightest bit of sense.
I completely understand what you say about historians or at last those who triy to do their work as unpartial as possible... But all sources, whatever they come can't be completely guaranteed excepted to be oneself here excatly when an event happen. No one has hte Thruth as some wanted to explain... Every information as you worte can be biased by so many organisations, for any "good" reasons... Nothing to compare with conspiracy and the naive point fo view... I'm just trying to be as realistic as possible. I take every info i can see, every book i can read but i only make my own opinion and not say iti is the Thruth as some people say. Propaganda, demagogy has always existed allover the world... What i only said is that at final we only keep in mind winner's views on every event (i talk mainly about important events influenting the world or a big area.
Its there to see that the planes went into the building and the buildings fell down. Its not there to see that the us govt put explosives in the building and blew it up.
hmmm hmmm, where i wrote the contrary of what you said ? please ;-)
hmmm hmmm, where i wrote the contrary of what you said ? please ;-)
At all conspiracy theory people: stop being so gullible. Thank you.
Ok, so, we'll just forget the Gulf of Tonkin incident or the sinking of USS Maine in Spanish–American War.
We no need conspirations, but a little bit of History.
Bye.
Ok, so, we'll just forget the Gulf of Tonkin incident or the sinking of USS Maine in Spanish–American War.
We no need conspirations, but a little bit of History.
Bye.
And so it is ;)
It like: if you can't come to the doctor, the doctor will come to you ;)
It like: if you can't come to the doctor, the doctor will come to you ;)
or, old one, befor 9.11:
If Bush doesnt go to Afghanistan/Iraq, Usama will go to USA :-)
If Bush doesnt go to Afghanistan/Iraq, Usama will go to USA :-)