Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD

:-)

I hope and believe that most of Europeans do not "think" like you too :-)

He does put it a bit crude, but the ammount of nonsense in this topic is unbelievable. Speculation without serious proof should never be portrayed like hard facts.

If you want a solid explanation without need for controlled demolition, look here: I am a link

Edit: typo
(edited)

Very good article. For those that have no patience reading it through, here's the key part:
"It has been suggested that it was fortunate that the WTC did not tip over onto other buildings surrounding the area. There are several points that should be made. First, the building is not solid; it is 95 percent air and, hence, can implode onto itself. Second, there is no lateral load, even the impact of a speeding aircraft, which is sufficient to move the center of gravity one hundred feet to the side such that it is not within the base footprint of the structure. Third, given the near free-fall collapse, there was insufficient time for portions to attain significant lateral velocity. To summarize all of these points, a 500,000 t structure has too much inertia to fall in any direction other than nearly straight down."

Ok, then explain me collapse of WTC 7 building...maybe they needed more space for constructing new WTC???

I like how you ignored Schepel's article and posted bs as your reasoning.

interesting article, but I must read it all and carefully, it will take a time :-)

Look for your answers in the article I linked to. These buildings where designed to withstand fire for 3 hours. For exactly the same reasons as the main towers collapsed like they did, WT7 went down. The only real question is why it burned. The answer isn't so difficult. All buildings in the vicinity suffered. As to why it wasn't put out in time to save the building: maybe, just maybe, people where not thinking completely straight and/or had different priorities.
(edited)

Maybe it had something to do with the basements these buildings were standing on? You know what would have been strange, if WTC1 and 2 felt down, and some building on the other end of the street, not next to it ;) That would have been really strange .. now it's the building next to it, not that strange. If your house falls down, good change the neighbors have to protect their house so it doesn't collapse also. Is this a conspiracy or cause and effect?

And if government lies to us once, they can make it twice and more times :-)

of course they lie. There are Aliens living with us - have you not watched the EVENT! Sheesh her from E.R. is now taking over the world - wonder whatever happened to her limp!!!

The truth is out there.... no not there.... over there

500,000 t structure should fall straight down...yes but I was talking about that at first that steel construction should change its shape,make "slope" and start to falling down to one side (I am just not able to explain it better in my "English") so I was talking that it can not start to falling straight down.

Look on various accident by simple fire in skyscrapers and than look on controlled demolition.

Of course, if somebody know about that plane crash before and load on it some special high burning material or something, you can make so huge fire and temperature that you will melted down 2-3 floors at once maybe, but this is about that somebody should help to make such a accident, normal plane with fuel (I read something about jet burners and additives or what was in that article) but other articles are just laughing on such a arguments, that such a huge fire / such a high temperature was normal oil or normal air-plane crash.

But there are much more interesting factors (but I dont have all day for this), like that how and where was made one video and why author of video can not say even from which place he recorded it :-) and much more doubtful things. I think that if it is really just a terrorist attack and gov was not able to know about it before and be prepared for that what to do with building that there should not be so much unanswered questions. Like that Pentagon cameras story.... so much cameras and no video and so...

ok, everybody can have our own story, I just dont believe because USA gov lied us once, and that government use lies for years so why to believe them ?

In Iraq was nuclear weapons but ALIENS take them away and now they are hiding in Libya :-DDD

ok, everybody can have our own story, I just dont believe because USA gov lied us once, and that government use lies for years so why to believe them ?

Another film reference....


BECAUSE WE CANT HANDLE THE TRUTH!!!!

Steel loses structural integrity - gravity takes its affect - upon too much deformation - the load becomes too much - building collapses - inward. Wow. You really have US issues.

I'm not an engineer, but I'd say that it would be really strange if the result of deformed steel would be a slope. The pressure is downwards. If the beams lose their structural integrity, they'll not lift part of the building upwards. Remember, the beams lose strength. As for other buildings reacting differently to a fire, I'd be really surprised if each and every building out there is built in the same way with exactly the same influence of wind etc.

interesting discussion here... :)

(sarcasm on) i like some peoples unreality. (sarcasm off).