Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
 Topic closed!!!

Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD

2011-05-04 16:14:02
interesting discussion here... :)

(sarcasm on) i like some peoples unreality. (sarcasm off).
2011-05-04 16:19:58
good explanation in this video.

2011-05-04 16:40:51
And another 1 that gives a good view of the damage.

2011-05-04 16:44:19
but how does that explain flight 93.

Only hands and feet were found, its obvious that govt agents were on board, forced passengers to a mind controlling pill, make phone calls and say stuff about terrorists taking the plane. Then the agents chopped up all the passengers using chainsaws they smuggled onto the plane in their pockets, they then dropped a big boulder to create a crater, then lifted the boulder up again (very strong agents) before dropping the hands and feet and a bit of burning stuff into the crater, without being seen by anyone. The plane then flew off again, turning off its radar and went to afghanistan to drop Bin Laden (aka Tim Osman) off with chainsaws and other weapons that were smuggled onboard, which is why there is no plane there and no fuel.

ITS OBVIOUS!
2011-05-04 17:12:43
That would be something if that was true :P
2011-05-04 17:15:05
This is also something to thing about of WTC7 (also mentioned in this topic already) ... I just can't believe the second video is true. To many people have to be involved and say nothing.




(edited)
2011-05-04 17:22:32
The truth is out there.... no not there.... over there

BECAUSE WE CANT HANDLE THE TRUTH!!!!


LOL
2011-05-04 17:41:22
lol, i like the bit at 8 minutes on the second one where he says building 7 imploded, unlike the twin towers. Sort of buggers up the twin towers were blown up theory lol

Just so many flaws with the theories.
Why would they get the firefighters out of tower 7 and not 1 & 2? Why would gilliani stay in tower 7? Why get some people to not be in the tower and let others go? Why wouldnt they get their stories straight? Cover ups are often found out because the stories are too perfect. How come so many people have kept quiet about it if its true? Why was there no sound, remains or evidence of any explosion?

Its just coincidences thrown together.
2011-05-04 17:51:50
Satellite Images Reveal Massive North Korean Gulag, Containing 200,000 Prisoners
Gus Lubin | May 4, 2011, 9:45 AM

North Korea has massively expanded its mountain prison camps, Amnesty International claims based on new satellite imagery.

An estimated 200,000 people live in the gulag. Prisoners are put to work producing products ranging from soy bean paste and sweets to coal and cement.

Here's a picture of ten of the camps: businessinsider.com - Satellite Images


wow, 200,000 prisoners used as slaves ... 10 times more prisoners as the Netherlands but only 1.5 times the total population (estimate population North Korea 24M).
2011-05-04 18:34:04
I will tell you something about europe. If such a accident would have happen in europe, all states would ask for detailed investigation with much of pictures, videos and analyses so that nobody can doubt about it, doubt about what really happens. But US government is different,

Oh, so if the US government says something it is a lie. But if European governments agree to it, then it is the truth?

Let me tell you something about America. There are thousands of journalists who work every day to bring us the 'news'. Some of the 'news' is provided by the our government, and I know that it is slanted to make the US or those in power look the best. But the thousands of journalist work to get at the REAL truth. (The reasons for going to war in Iraq is a perfect example...we were told about weapons of mass destruction, that Iraq was buying uranium, and other things. But our journalist, over time, disproved these things).
I have not heard one credible news agency report, or even mention that our government 'faked' 9/11. This is fantasy.

I did not say that the jet fuel melted the steel. Was I said was that the extreme heat caused metal fatigue, which led to the collapse.
2011-05-04 19:34:08
and what about number of victims in WTC? There had to be almost 90k people in both buildings together and died just 3k (counting into amount policemen and firemen). Quite strange for me...also none of the companies didn´t close their business because of loosing any documentation...also what about quick signing the insurance for complex a month before? U.S. insurance companies didn´t loose any cent on WTC attack, but German Bayern Reinsurance company went to bankruptcy...

please don´t take me offensive to your nation, I have nothing against American, but your govs did too much wrong things in foreign policy in last years...
2011-05-04 19:42:57
and what about number of victims in WTC?

It was still early and a lot of people got out in time. Too many didn't, but don't forget it took 2 hours before the towers collapsed.

As for the rest: chance. Almost all big European companies are deeply entwined with the US economy. I know it's hard to accept, but chance is big part of our daily lives.
2011-05-04 19:45:21
I think there were about 56k people who worked there, but far from all of them were at work. I've heard three reasons for that:
1. It was some kind of an election on that day, which probably meant people did that before going to work.
2. The attack was quite early, so far from all had arrived at work.
3. There was some complications with the transportations (traffic jams and the trains didn't arrive on time), so many were late for work.

Besides, I think there were something like 16.000 people who was at work, but worked on levels lower than where the first plane hit, so they could come out quite easily.
And I guess that after the first plane had hit, few went about their business as usual in the 2nd tower. In fact, I doubt many were still in it when the 2nd plane hit (though I haven't found any facts about how many was there).
2011-05-04 19:46:40
But Nato won't do a thing for them.
2011-05-04 19:54:59
Why would they? It's a defensive alliance remember?
Imo they do interpretate it quite big these days but it is still a defensive alliance
2011-05-04 19:59:57
oh yeah and invasion (Iraq, Libya) is calling defending in English now? good to know...