Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD
Absolutely. The biggest difference is, of course, that everyone has the right to be upset, but nobody has the right to kill someone because of it.
Paid out of pocket notorious British Committee on Equality and Human Rights (Equalities and Human Rights Commission) found that British police would be guilty of "racism" if it allows its officers "to take race into account" during stop and search people.
As usual in such cases, the most "racist" are the facts and statistics that show the falsity of equality and horror cavalrymen multi-kulti society. According to calculations by the Metropolitan Police from 2008., Blacks were responsible for more than half of the so-called. "Crimes of cutlery (knife crime), and the vast majority of victims were white men.
Other details of Scotland Yard revealed that the black race of people were responsible for:
- 67% of crimes involving firearms,
- 54% of street crime, including robbery, assault and theft,
- 32% of sexual assault
Committee on Equality and Human Rights from the year massive lead an aggressive campaign against the British National Party, by bringing its subsequent process of "racism" and discrimination. EHRC Leader Trevor Phillips, even went to a public statement that "members of the BNP are not people", in response to the BNP leader Nick Griffin called it a "black racist" in an interview with Channel 4 TV
source: bnp.org.uk
As usual in such cases, the most "racist" are the facts and statistics that show the falsity of equality and horror cavalrymen multi-kulti society. According to calculations by the Metropolitan Police from 2008., Blacks were responsible for more than half of the so-called. "Crimes of cutlery (knife crime), and the vast majority of victims were white men.
Other details of Scotland Yard revealed that the black race of people were responsible for:
- 67% of crimes involving firearms,
- 54% of street crime, including robbery, assault and theft,
- 32% of sexual assault
Committee on Equality and Human Rights from the year massive lead an aggressive campaign against the British National Party, by bringing its subsequent process of "racism" and discrimination. EHRC Leader Trevor Phillips, even went to a public statement that "members of the BNP are not people", in response to the BNP leader Nick Griffin called it a "black racist" in an interview with Channel 4 TV
source: bnp.org.uk
the fact is that unfortunately, many young black males over hare live in the lower end of society and are more exposed to a live of crime..
here we have some black people emigrants and they do less matters than other ethnics
usually is an economic problem, i mean i dont imagine Michael Jordan assalting anyone, he is loaded
usually is an economic problem, i mean i dont imagine Michael Jordan assalting anyone, he is loaded
There is no single black race. Honestly, do normal scientific values mean anything at all to some people out there? With this sort of thing you can easily argue that bread causes violent deaths. After all, almost everyone who dies from an violent crime ate bread at some point in his life. Crime isn't related to skin colour. If you're lucky enough to be born with a certain skin colour, you're not in some magical way predestined to commit crime. On the other hand, if you're born in a poor family with a historical affinity for crime, you're very likely to turn to crime as well. Also, keep in mind that crime is a given fact. In the not so distant past where coloured immigrants were a rarity, crime did exist too. It was even more abundant than it's now.
No. You say I made a confusion between Freedom of thought and Freedom of speech, but you confuse Freedom of speech and Freedom of acting. Freedom of speech stops right there where the someone else's rights are violated. Threatening is still a crime. I just wanted to say that I think everyone should have the 'right' to say something, even if it is very insulting to other people.
"... although intelligent people would recommend you to refrain from using 'your right' to do so, in such cases", I wanted to add.
why is it that you can such intelligent things when the subject isn't a flemish indepentent state?
(edited)
"... although intelligent people would recommend you to refrain from using 'your right' to do so, in such cases", I wanted to add.
why is it that you can such intelligent things when the subject isn't a flemish indepentent state?
(edited)
in a lot of countrys they can put you in jail if you say that the holocoust wasn't that big/bad ...
There are not many countrys where the freedom of speech is unlimited.
There are not many countrys where the freedom of speech is unlimited.
any kind of mass murder is terrible and without proper justifying
http://www.npr.org/assets/news/2010/05/17/concern.pdf
take it or leave it
(edited)
take it or leave it
(edited)
Because I am intelligent? :p Stupid questions ask for stupid answers.
The question was why you acted like that on the subject of separatism though...
I see you defending the right on free speech here with the explicit condition that an opinion might be hurtful to people, but IIRC you ran away from the discussion topic just because so-called hurtful opinions. This seems like an interesting twist.
Also, I like the distinction you make between thinking and acting, in the name of pragmatism and balance between peoples. It seems like the proponents of separatism should have made the same distinction. At least to be able to. However, as soon as you start speaking Flemish, this ability disappears. Why? :p
I see you defending the right on free speech here with the explicit condition that an opinion might be hurtful to people, but IIRC you ran away from the discussion topic just because so-called hurtful opinions. This seems like an interesting twist.
Also, I like the distinction you make between thinking and acting, in the name of pragmatism and balance between peoples. It seems like the proponents of separatism should have made the same distinction. At least to be able to. However, as soon as you start speaking Flemish, this ability disappears. Why? :p
I see you defending the right on free speech here with the explicit condition that an opinion might be hurtful to people, but IIRC you ran away from the discussion topic just because so-called hurtful opinions. This seems like an interesting twist.
Just like it is your right to say what you want ( you can insult me, no problem ), it is my right to ignore you for that reason. When you insult someone, you know there might be consequences. Maybe that person will start to ignore you, a religious Christian would offer you his second cheek and others might start to insult you back. I chose the first option. I think that when you start a discussion ( and certainly a political one ), respect is the key word. If I don't feel any respect for me or my opinion - how terrible it might be for you - than I don't feel like going further into that discussion. And I really don't like it, but I'm not going to discuss Flemish nationalism on the Belgian forum. Although I really liked the discussions. In my opinion, I've been insulted ( insulted is a big word, but you know what I mean ) by both you and Pietro.
Also, I like the distinction you make between thinking and acting, in the name of pragmatism and balance between peoples. It seems like the proponents of separatism should have made the same distinction. At least to be able to. However, as soon as you start speaking Flemish, this ability disappears. Why? :p
I always make the distinction between 1) Freedom of thoughts, 2) Freedom of speech and 3) Freedom of acting. First one is unlimited, last one is ( of course ) seriously limited. The key is to find a correct limit for the second one.
I never denied that my Flemish nationalism isn't only a rational 'choice'. Of course it isn't completely rational, because there are a lot of uncertainties. I'm not insensitive to emotional aspects of the Flemish People's Movement.
(edited)
Just like it is your right to say what you want ( you can insult me, no problem ), it is my right to ignore you for that reason. When you insult someone, you know there might be consequences. Maybe that person will start to ignore you, a religious Christian would offer you his second cheek and others might start to insult you back. I chose the first option. I think that when you start a discussion ( and certainly a political one ), respect is the key word. If I don't feel any respect for me or my opinion - how terrible it might be for you - than I don't feel like going further into that discussion. And I really don't like it, but I'm not going to discuss Flemish nationalism on the Belgian forum. Although I really liked the discussions. In my opinion, I've been insulted ( insulted is a big word, but you know what I mean ) by both you and Pietro.
Also, I like the distinction you make between thinking and acting, in the name of pragmatism and balance between peoples. It seems like the proponents of separatism should have made the same distinction. At least to be able to. However, as soon as you start speaking Flemish, this ability disappears. Why? :p
I always make the distinction between 1) Freedom of thoughts, 2) Freedom of speech and 3) Freedom of acting. First one is unlimited, last one is ( of course ) seriously limited. The key is to find a correct limit for the second one.
I never denied that my Flemish nationalism isn't only a rational 'choice'. Of course it isn't completely rational, because there are a lot of uncertainties. I'm not insensitive to emotional aspects of the Flemish People's Movement.
(edited)
Nasa raises hopes of finding extra-terrestrials with discovery of 'alien' bacteria that survives in arsenic
By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 12:51 PM on 1st December 2010
Incredible microbe found in California lake
Nasa scientists are set to announce that bacteria have been discovered that can survive in arsenic, an element previously thought too toxic to support life, it can be revealed.
In a press conference scheduled for tomorrow evening, researchers will unveil the discovery of the incredible microbe - which substitutes arsenic for phosphorus to sustain its growth - in a lake in California.
The remarkable discovery raises the prospect that life could exist on other planets which do not have phosphorus in the atmosphere, which had previously been thought vital for life to begin.
But it will come as a major disappointment for those who had hoped Nasa was about to announce that it had found life on other planets.
Nasa sparked alien hysteria around the world with its announcement of a major press conference to be held tomorrow.
It induced feverish debate as to whether scientists were about to announce that they had discovered life on other worlds.
But after The Sun broke the embargo on the story this morning, it can be revealed that the truth is rather closer to home.
The scientists discovered the bacteria in Mono Lake near California's Yosemite National Park.
The space agency had said it plans to reveal an 'astrobiology finding that will impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life' but the information was under embargo until 7pm GMT.
The announcement caused frenzied speculation on the internet.
'Did they find ET?', asked one headline in the U S., while another wrote, 'Has Nasa found little green men?'
Speculation mounted around the world about the mystery information and buoyed people who already believe in aliens.
One said on U.S. news website MSNBC, 'It's still hard for me to understand why people can't accept that aliens exist... ET is real'.
'Fact is, life is everywhere,' another wrote. 'I don't need some BS announcement to know it because I have common sense.'
A newspaper in South Korea proclaimed 'Nasa to hold news conference on alien life'.
The event will be streamed live on the internet tomorrow evening: www.nasa.gov
There are also conspiracy theorists who believe the government is involved in a cover-up of some kind.
'It is embarrassing how our country makes it all a secret and hides and controls what we know,' one American ranted, insisting aliens do exist and the U.S. knows it.
'The government lies to us all the time.'
Others were more light-hearted in their predictions.
'Looks like good old Elvis finally ran out of hiding places!,' joked a person on a science blog.
A study last month said that the universe is teeming with planets capable of supporting alien life, according to a new study.
After studying stars similar to the Sun, astronomers found that almost one in four could have small, rocky planets just like the Earth.
www.dailymail.co.uk
A pity it's only about 'incredible microbes' on Earth and not real aliens. But still this is a nice finding for the future, life based on other elements :)
By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 12:51 PM on 1st December 2010
Incredible microbe found in California lake
Nasa scientists are set to announce that bacteria have been discovered that can survive in arsenic, an element previously thought too toxic to support life, it can be revealed.
In a press conference scheduled for tomorrow evening, researchers will unveil the discovery of the incredible microbe - which substitutes arsenic for phosphorus to sustain its growth - in a lake in California.
The remarkable discovery raises the prospect that life could exist on other planets which do not have phosphorus in the atmosphere, which had previously been thought vital for life to begin.
But it will come as a major disappointment for those who had hoped Nasa was about to announce that it had found life on other planets.
Nasa sparked alien hysteria around the world with its announcement of a major press conference to be held tomorrow.
It induced feverish debate as to whether scientists were about to announce that they had discovered life on other worlds.
But after The Sun broke the embargo on the story this morning, it can be revealed that the truth is rather closer to home.
The scientists discovered the bacteria in Mono Lake near California's Yosemite National Park.
The space agency had said it plans to reveal an 'astrobiology finding that will impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life' but the information was under embargo until 7pm GMT.
The announcement caused frenzied speculation on the internet.
'Did they find ET?', asked one headline in the U S., while another wrote, 'Has Nasa found little green men?'
Speculation mounted around the world about the mystery information and buoyed people who already believe in aliens.
One said on U.S. news website MSNBC, 'It's still hard for me to understand why people can't accept that aliens exist... ET is real'.
'Fact is, life is everywhere,' another wrote. 'I don't need some BS announcement to know it because I have common sense.'
A newspaper in South Korea proclaimed 'Nasa to hold news conference on alien life'.
The event will be streamed live on the internet tomorrow evening: www.nasa.gov
There are also conspiracy theorists who believe the government is involved in a cover-up of some kind.
'It is embarrassing how our country makes it all a secret and hides and controls what we know,' one American ranted, insisting aliens do exist and the U.S. knows it.
'The government lies to us all the time.'
Others were more light-hearted in their predictions.
'Looks like good old Elvis finally ran out of hiding places!,' joked a person on a science blog.
A study last month said that the universe is teeming with planets capable of supporting alien life, according to a new study.
After studying stars similar to the Sun, astronomers found that almost one in four could have small, rocky planets just like the Earth.
www.dailymail.co.uk
A pity it's only about 'incredible microbes' on Earth and not real aliens. But still this is a nice finding for the future, life based on other elements :)
Brazil recognizes Palestinian state on 1967 borders
SAO PAULO (AP) — Brazil says it has recognized the state of Palestine based on borders at the time of Israel's 1967 conquest of the West Bank.
The Foreign Ministry says the recognition is in response to a request made by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas last month to President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
Silva sent a letter to Abbas on Dec. 1, saying Brazil recognizes Palestine and hopes that the recognition will help lead to states of Israel and Palestine "that will coexist peacefully and in security."
The foreign ministry says that the recognition is "in line with Brazil's historic willingness to contribute to peace between Israel and Palestine."
The announcement was posted Friday on the Foreign Ministry's website.
www.wgntv.com
Repect to Brazil, although the borders should be returned to before 1967!! Hope the rest of the world will follow this example of Brazil, but that is, unfortunatly, wishful thinking with all the western (pro)zionic governments.
(edited)
SAO PAULO (AP) — Brazil says it has recognized the state of Palestine based on borders at the time of Israel's 1967 conquest of the West Bank.
The Foreign Ministry says the recognition is in response to a request made by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas last month to President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
Silva sent a letter to Abbas on Dec. 1, saying Brazil recognizes Palestine and hopes that the recognition will help lead to states of Israel and Palestine "that will coexist peacefully and in security."
The foreign ministry says that the recognition is "in line with Brazil's historic willingness to contribute to peace between Israel and Palestine."
The announcement was posted Friday on the Foreign Ministry's website.
www.wgntv.com
Repect to Brazil, although the borders should be returned to before 1967!! Hope the rest of the world will follow this example of Brazil, but that is, unfortunatly, wishful thinking with all the western (pro)zionic governments.
(edited)