Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD
what pathetic comments. All i stated was facts. Different communities went out to protect their homes and businesses, the turks did it and got praised, Sikhs did it and got praised, muslims did it and got praised, English did it and get the racist hooligan crap spouted about them. And from the pictures of them walking about, you can quite clearly see black and asian lads with them.
But hey, dont let the facts get in the way of your stupidness. I wont expect an apology from the likes of you for calling me a racist. All i will say is that the public of the towns were glad they were there and stopped the looters and no, noone got beat up by them for being of a different skin colour. Nothing like a bit of ignorant labelling eh? Suppose you're the sort of biggoted moron who believes that all muslims are terrorists too?
But hey, dont let the facts get in the way of your stupidness. I wont expect an apology from the likes of you for calling me a racist. All i will say is that the public of the towns were glad they were there and stopped the looters and no, noone got beat up by them for being of a different skin colour. Nothing like a bit of ignorant labelling eh? Suppose you're the sort of biggoted moron who believes that all muslims are terrorists too?
Lol. :)
But just for the record - I never called you a racist (even though a bit of your writings is pointing towards it). I called the hooligans racist*.
It's a fact, that a huge chunk of the football firms, you're praising, are outright racists. Quite a lot even leaning towards neonazi sympathies. And them beeing on the forefront of vigilantilism now is probably caused a lot by them thinking, that they're in some kind of race war. Denying that is just ignorant.
*) Though only in one sentence in one of my postings - the important thing for me is the irony in notorious troblemakers cracking skulls and destroying property one day and claiming to be defending the public the next. The only reason hooliganism doesn't get out of control today like the rioters in major UK cities is their lack of numbers - and the fact that nowadays they're always heavily guarded by an alert police force when assembled. They're common thugs just like the rioters we se these days.
But just for the record - I never called you a racist (even though a bit of your writings is pointing towards it). I called the hooligans racist*.
It's a fact, that a huge chunk of the football firms, you're praising, are outright racists. Quite a lot even leaning towards neonazi sympathies. And them beeing on the forefront of vigilantilism now is probably caused a lot by them thinking, that they're in some kind of race war. Denying that is just ignorant.
*) Though only in one sentence in one of my postings - the important thing for me is the irony in notorious troblemakers cracking skulls and destroying property one day and claiming to be defending the public the next. The only reason hooliganism doesn't get out of control today like the rioters in major UK cities is their lack of numbers - and the fact that nowadays they're always heavily guarded by an alert police force when assembled. They're common thugs just like the rioters we se these days.
you know so very little about football lads, you really shouldnt be talking about them. A lot of the firms are well known for having black and white lads together, West Ham and Birmingham spring straight to mind. As for them being thugs, destroying property etc, just wow. They are well organised people who just want to let off a bit of steam with other people who feel the exact same way, thats why these days it mostly all happens miles away from stadiums, nowhere near innocent bystanders and just in empty spaces where they can just have a tear up for a few minutes.
And now you see them all uniting to protect people from having their houses being burnt down and being attacked and even killed.
There's nothing racist about standing up against wrong. It's such a ridiculous belief how people like you can condemn people who are standing up against evil, just pathetic. It had nothing to do with them thinking it would be a race war (although you suggesting this itself suggests that you believe a particular race are responsible for the riotting), it had everything to do with their area being targetted lightly the night before and they refused to let their streets look like war zones with burnt down houses and businesses like the riotters had said they would be doing there last night.
Seriously, you're pathetic. I'd much rather have people not wanting riotting, looting, fires, violence, etc on my street than people who did and want that and were likely to attack me and my property, wouldn't you?
And now you see them all uniting to protect people from having their houses being burnt down and being attacked and even killed.
There's nothing racist about standing up against wrong. It's such a ridiculous belief how people like you can condemn people who are standing up against evil, just pathetic. It had nothing to do with them thinking it would be a race war (although you suggesting this itself suggests that you believe a particular race are responsible for the riotting), it had everything to do with their area being targetted lightly the night before and they refused to let their streets look like war zones with burnt down houses and businesses like the riotters had said they would be doing there last night.
Seriously, you're pathetic. I'd much rather have people not wanting riotting, looting, fires, violence, etc on my street than people who did and want that and were likely to attack me and my property, wouldn't you?
The firms are fighting on remote locations, because it's the only way they can evade the police these days. There's absolutely no other reason. No moral code or whatever. I won't bother showing you any of the countless pieces of evidence out there that shows, what level of destruction hooligans leave behind, when they for once outnumber the police in an inhabited area. You know it's there.
(edited)
(edited)
In Britain? Recently? Nah, dont think so.
Anyways, you're contradicting your massively. Saying hooligans cant get numbers now, and saying these people out protecting there homes are hooligans. There are large crowds of people out protecting there homes, are they hooligans?
Are you going to address my other points? Or hoping noone notices your idiocy?
Anyways, you're contradicting your massively. Saying hooligans cant get numbers now, and saying these people out protecting there homes are hooligans. There are large crowds of people out protecting there homes, are they hooligans?
Are you going to address my other points? Or hoping noone notices your idiocy?
No, I won't. I don't feel the need to defend myself against your ridiculous accusations against me. I think your words are enough - I'll let everyone else be the judge.
There's plenty of human trash out there, so hooligans are plentyful. But luckily so are the police (and well prepared and ready to use force), when they assemble to "watch football". That's the main difference between most firm members and the rioters we see in England these days.
And of course a lot of other people are also taking it to the streets. But they are not the ones beeing discussed now. You're the one bringing football firms up at vigilante heroes - in numerous posts - in this debate.
There's plenty of human trash out there, so hooligans are plentyful. But luckily so are the police (and well prepared and ready to use force), when they assemble to "watch football". That's the main difference between most firm members and the rioters we see in England these days.
And of course a lot of other people are also taking it to the streets. But they are not the ones beeing discussed now. You're the one bringing football firms up at vigilante heroes - in numerous posts - in this debate.
Sort of lame interview, to ask this man questions and not letting him answer them...
and your point is what?
You dont have one do you?
You were found out on various points that i brought up and you just ignored it all. You first there aren't many hooligans, now you say there are lots of them.
People who go out to stop wanton vandalism, theft, arson and violence, and to stop more people getting murdered are bad people in your books. Great morals you have there (Y)
Thankfully, they dont care about idiots like you and protected their homes and businesses, receiving gratitude and thanks from all the local people, businesses and even fire services.
You dont have one do you?
You were found out on various points that i brought up and you just ignored it all. You first there aren't many hooligans, now you say there are lots of them.
People who go out to stop wanton vandalism, theft, arson and violence, and to stop more people getting murdered are bad people in your books. Great morals you have there (Y)
Thankfully, they dont care about idiots like you and protected their homes and businesses, receiving gratitude and thanks from all the local people, businesses and even fire services.
[Insert comment from someone who gives a damn, what you think]
So again ignoring the intellectual reasoning because you've been found out.
Now back to the riots, i think the worst is over now and there wont be much at all now, but Birmingham will be tense after last night.
Now back to the riots, i think the worst is over now and there wont be much at all now, but Birmingham will be tense after last night.
Intellectual reasoning? I think you've got the wrong thread, mate. "Funny things" are two threads down.
And again a total contradiction of yourself. You're clearly not ignoring me by directly replying to me and you've clearly not answered the points.
Please stop embarrassing yourself.
Any other news anywhere?
Please stop embarrassing yourself.
Any other news anywhere?
British far-right leader says 1,000 to take to streets to deter rioters
The show of strength by police appeared to have quelled unrest in London late Tuesday, but in a move that could raise tensions, a far-right group said about 1,000 of its members around the country were taking to the streets to deter rioters.
“We're going to stop the riots — police obviously can't handle it,” Stephen Lennon, leader of the far-right English Defense League, told The Associated Press. He warned that he couldn't guarantee there wouldn't be violent clashes with rioting youths.
Anders Behring Breivik, who has confessed to the bombing and massacre that killed 77 people in Norway last month, has cited the EDL as an inspiration.
(edited)
The show of strength by police appeared to have quelled unrest in London late Tuesday, but in a move that could raise tensions, a far-right group said about 1,000 of its members around the country were taking to the streets to deter rioters.
“We're going to stop the riots — police obviously can't handle it,” Stephen Lennon, leader of the far-right English Defense League, told The Associated Press. He warned that he couldn't guarantee there wouldn't be violent clashes with rioting youths.
Anders Behring Breivik, who has confessed to the bombing and massacre that killed 77 people in Norway last month, has cited the EDL as an inspiration.
(edited)
Your point is? That stopping the riotters where the police cant handle it is a bad thing?
Not sure how the pathetic non-links to brievik has anything to do with anything either, i could go into great details about how pathetic anyone is who seriously believes there is a link any stronger than the EDL and Brievik both didnt like islamic extremism.
Not sure how the pathetic non-links to brievik has anything to do with anything either, i could go into great details about how pathetic anyone is who seriously believes there is a link any stronger than the EDL and Brievik both didnt like islamic extremism.