Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD
no, whats clear is that you have no basis for anything you say, it's all presumptious garbage. You're trying to tell me what people think and whats happening and passing it off as fact, when you dont have a clue what they think and the actual facts show you to be talking garbage.
I'm not here to insult, i'm here too educate and re-lay the facts and stop vicious rumours from spreading, like yours, that are liable to make the situation worse.
I'm not here to insult, i'm here too educate and re-lay the facts and stop vicious rumours from spreading, like yours, that are liable to make the situation worse.
On my way to bed I stopped by this article with video footage. I'll let others be the judge who needs education on the subject.
Looks to me like valuable police ressources are beeing wasted preventing the locals and EDL-people from getting a little too into all the vigilante stuff. I also saw another vid on the Guardian website with some better views of the background. Let's just say I didn't count a lot of blacks in the crowd. Maybe the odd Turk or Pakistani, but it sure was more Fred Perry sneakers than baggy pants.
(edited)
Looks to me like valuable police ressources are beeing wasted preventing the locals and EDL-people from getting a little too into all the vigilante stuff. I also saw another vid on the Guardian website with some better views of the background. Let's just say I didn't count a lot of blacks in the crowd. Maybe the odd Turk or Pakistani, but it sure was more Fred Perry sneakers than baggy pants.
(edited)
well just from the headline you can tell the first articles crap, EDL aren't a political party at all.
Anyways, the facts:
- there was no trouble with these groups that you claim were EDL groups.
- there were none white people there (as you've now said)
- the riotting didn't destroy their area
- Noone was hurt in their are
Now for some questions. How many non-Sikh people do you see in the sikh groups? How many non-muslims did you see in the muslim groups? There was trouble and deaths in disturbances with the muslim groups, are they racist and violent? Do people have a right to defend their homes? Ans what the hell does this mean, it sure was more Fred Perry sneakers than baggy pants? Because if it means what i think it means, thats a bit of a racist statement if ever i saw one.
http://www.youtube.com/v/VoXKbdaJEc0&feature=player_embedded - and look, a black guy part of the groups as soons the video starts, how about that eh?
(edited)
Anyways, the facts:
- there was no trouble with these groups that you claim were EDL groups.
- there were none white people there (as you've now said)
- the riotting didn't destroy their area
- Noone was hurt in their are
Now for some questions. How many non-Sikh people do you see in the sikh groups? How many non-muslims did you see in the muslim groups? There was trouble and deaths in disturbances with the muslim groups, are they racist and violent? Do people have a right to defend their homes? Ans what the hell does this mean, it sure was more Fred Perry sneakers than baggy pants? Because if it means what i think it means, thats a bit of a racist statement if ever i saw one.
http://www.youtube.com/v/VoXKbdaJEc0&feature=player_embedded - and look, a black guy part of the groups as soons the video starts, how about that eh?
(edited)
Ans what the hell does this mean, it sure was more Fred Perry sneakers than baggy pants? Because if it means what i think it means, thats a bit of a racist statement if ever i saw one.
Hahaha... That's actually very funny. I knew yesterday before going to bed that that excact sentence would be your main line of defence. I even thought about writing a "ghost answer" in another thread to show after your answer, just to proove how predictable you are. Unfortunately it was only after I'd turned my computer off, that I thought of it, so I ended up not giving too much thought about it. You people are alle the same. I've seen it in a thousand debates on the internet before. In lack of real arguments you turn to distortion and distraction.
Anyways I strongly suspect, you haven't seen the video footage. I hardly think the three black kids in the bus agree with you, that there was no trouble with the groups. Luckily the police was there to keep the thugs off the bus.
And quite a few of the vigilantes were in fact EDL people. Calling them neo-nazis is probably strecthing it. But they definately share a lot of common ground. And whether or not they are a party or a movement really is irrelevant. But it's another good example of you guys prefer to distract in a discussion rather than relate to the substance.
No rioting destroyed any areas yesterday. But you can bet for sure, that the heavy rain had more to do with that than any hooligans on parade.
Over and out. I've got work to do today.
Hahaha... That's actually very funny. I knew yesterday before going to bed that that excact sentence would be your main line of defence. I even thought about writing a "ghost answer" in another thread to show after your answer, just to proove how predictable you are. Unfortunately it was only after I'd turned my computer off, that I thought of it, so I ended up not giving too much thought about it. You people are alle the same. I've seen it in a thousand debates on the internet before. In lack of real arguments you turn to distortion and distraction.
Anyways I strongly suspect, you haven't seen the video footage. I hardly think the three black kids in the bus agree with you, that there was no trouble with the groups. Luckily the police was there to keep the thugs off the bus.
And quite a few of the vigilantes were in fact EDL people. Calling them neo-nazis is probably strecthing it. But they definately share a lot of common ground. And whether or not they are a party or a movement really is irrelevant. But it's another good example of you guys prefer to distract in a discussion rather than relate to the substance.
No rioting destroyed any areas yesterday. But you can bet for sure, that the heavy rain had more to do with that than any hooligans on parade.
Over and out. I've got work to do today.
Europe's left-wing useful idiots:)
Yes, it's about hate and race and the Anders Behring Breivik-fan needs to post again ... ofcourse, I could have known!
(edited)
Yes, it's about hate and race and the Anders Behring Breivik-fan needs to post again ... ofcourse, I could have known!
(edited)
Some asshole is running with a gun in our Ministry of Defence building atm. Also bomb exploded but it was somekinda home-made so it didnt do much damage. Tho bomb-squad is there aswell now. 1 hostage so far but no news about casualties.
Seems similar to that norwegian dudes adventure :(
Hopefully we got some good snipers or something.
Seems similar to that norwegian dudes adventure :(
Hopefully we got some good snipers or something.
seriously, you really havent got a clue about the EDL.
Yeah, quite a few were EDL, what's your point? They didnt cause any trouble, they stopped the riotters, had support of locals (seeing as most of the group were locals) and no harm was done. The lads on the bus started all that if you read the reports, with hand signals.
Where's your slagging off of the muslim vigilantes? They actually did have disturbances and 3 died.
Where's your slagging off of the sikh vigilantes? The one's openly brandishing swords.
Of course, with people like you, thats acceptable, but when a white person does it, it automatically becomes racist and unacceptable, an easy target. Everyone has a right to defend their homes, even white people.
Still didnt answer what that statement about sneakers and baggy pants meant...
Yeah, quite a few were EDL, what's your point? They didnt cause any trouble, they stopped the riotters, had support of locals (seeing as most of the group were locals) and no harm was done. The lads on the bus started all that if you read the reports, with hand signals.
Where's your slagging off of the muslim vigilantes? They actually did have disturbances and 3 died.
Where's your slagging off of the sikh vigilantes? The one's openly brandishing swords.
Of course, with people like you, thats acceptable, but when a white person does it, it automatically becomes racist and unacceptable, an easy target. Everyone has a right to defend their homes, even white people.
Still didnt answer what that statement about sneakers and baggy pants meant...
No need to. I think everybody but one got the message. If you want to misinterpret and distort my words, there's not a thing I can do about it. So I won't try to.
You don't have arguments, so talk about Breivik. It's like Godwin's law. 1-0 for me, as usual.
Did I ever write something good about Breivik? I don't recall. Left-wing idiots have been so, try to convince someone that what he never said.
PS. The biggest racists in the world are just left-wing idiots.
Did I ever write something good about Breivik? I don't recall. Left-wing idiots have been so, try to convince someone that what he never said.
PS. The biggest racists in the world are just left-wing idiots.
You picked your words rather unlucky. Now Company's going to say you said that far-right is a disease, although you didn't say that. His thinking is a disease. Populism is a disease of democracy. But it's hard to cure.
(edited)
(edited)
I mean far-right (extreem-rechts in Dutch) + populism :) A combination of these 2 is the worst and happening a lot in Europe at the moment.
(edited)
(edited)
I know what far-right is, no need to put it in Dutch ;-)
I mean far-right + populism :) A combination of these 2 is the worst and happening a lot in Europe at the moment.
;P
;P
The combination of far-left and populism is as bad as the combo far-right and populism. Extreme political ideas in combination with populism is a disease of democracy.