Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD
that are two different case, not equal.
I can allow this:
- people talking about advantages of communism and fail of conservatism
- people talking why is religion useless and so or people talking that religion should be at school and connected with state and so..
I can not allow this:
- people talking in not polite way, very aggressive about why is communism better, talking in such a rude style that he is hurting people who like communism maybe
- people insulting or "disparaging" religion and people in faith in ugly style of communication or people who have too much fanatics opinions for having religions everywhere as a law, with too much fanatics methods how to achieve and so
This is all about limits. But we need limits. Limits must not have be areas, but just style of their speech or so.....
for example. I can tell to somebody at the forum here that he is small and looks quite ugly. But I can not tell that he is moth.fu... and so... There are limits in freedom of speech.
Or I can tell that some players here are faking talent of junior players, that they are lying and public not true jumps but I can not tell here how to cheat and have 100 multyaccounts or how to hack the game.
Do you see that there are limits and that are good and needed?
I can allow this:
- people talking about advantages of communism and fail of conservatism
- people talking why is religion useless and so or people talking that religion should be at school and connected with state and so..
I can not allow this:
- people talking in not polite way, very aggressive about why is communism better, talking in such a rude style that he is hurting people who like communism maybe
- people insulting or "disparaging" religion and people in faith in ugly style of communication or people who have too much fanatics opinions for having religions everywhere as a law, with too much fanatics methods how to achieve and so
This is all about limits. But we need limits. Limits must not have be areas, but just style of their speech or so.....
for example. I can tell to somebody at the forum here that he is small and looks quite ugly. But I can not tell that he is moth.fu... and so... There are limits in freedom of speech.
Or I can tell that some players here are faking talent of junior players, that they are lying and public not true jumps but I can not tell here how to cheat and have 100 multyaccounts or how to hack the game.
Do you see that there are limits and that are good and needed?
Do you see that there are limits and that are good and needed?
Of course there are limits between good behavior and bad behavior. However, it's not the state who should determine this. I think you shouldn't use vulgarity neither, but that doesn't mean that I think it shouldn't be allowed. It should be allowed, but one should not use it. That's why an intelligent person would recommend you to not always use your right on freedom of speech.
Of course there are limits between good behavior and bad behavior. However, it's not the state who should determine this. I think you shouldn't use vulgarity neither, but that doesn't mean that I think it shouldn't be allowed. It should be allowed, but one should not use it. That's why an intelligent person would recommend you to not always use your right on freedom of speech.
Sir, I could not agree more. This really says it all. Well done.
ok, but why we have mods for sokker forum (also for freestyle), if we all like freedom of speech :-D ??
My point was; yes, your speech maybe free, you may speak your mind, but we DO have a set of "game"rules, by wich you have to comply, as you joined a society or an online game.
these rules in real life is the law ....you may say anything but some words in some setting might be illegal and you can be prosecuted for it.
these rules in real life is the law ....you may say anything but some words in some setting might be illegal and you can be prosecuted for it.
these rules in real life is the law ....you may say anything but some words in some setting might be illegal and you can be prosecuted for it.
And my point is that it is wrong one can be prosecuted for a non-violent opinion. I think it is wrong you can be put in jail in Belgium because you deny the Holocaust (denying it is of course plain stupid, but is it necessary to make him serve time because he's stupid?).
And my point is that it is wrong one can be prosecuted for a non-violent opinion. I think it is wrong you can be put in jail in Belgium because you deny the Holocaust (denying it is of course plain stupid, but is it necessary to make him serve time because he's stupid?).
How the hell can they tell it were 42 times? Somebody watched him all night?^^
No idea, maybe he kept the "score" on the paper :/
Sad story really, it was a disease...
Sad story really, it was a disease...
Questioning staff decisions is not allowed.
This is your last warning.
This is your last warning.
I wondered about the same thing myself. I'm also quite curious how such a thing could possibly kill him.
fell off and he bled to death :)
They knew it was 42, because 43 would just be too hard to believe.
They knew it was 42, because 43 would just be too hard to believe.
So we have new government in Lybia.... based on democratic principles as western EU has.
So there will be end of all terrorists hiding in Lybia finally, right ?
Today, I am reading this:
Meanwhile, a representative of the Libyan opposition National Transition Council said Sunday that the body has no plans to extradite al-Megrahi to the United Kingdom or the United States.
.....al-Megrahi, who'd been convicted for helping to plot the 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/envoy/lockerbie-bomber-won-t-extradited-libya-opposition-group-165216351.html
This kind of government is what EU need before attacking Quaddafi ?
So there will be end of all terrorists hiding in Lybia finally, right ?
Today, I am reading this:
Meanwhile, a representative of the Libyan opposition National Transition Council said Sunday that the body has no plans to extradite al-Megrahi to the United Kingdom or the United States.
.....al-Megrahi, who'd been convicted for helping to plot the 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/envoy/lockerbie-bomber-won-t-extradited-libya-opposition-group-165216351.html
This kind of government is what EU need before attacking Quaddafi ?
????
totally bogus what I read here...what is the question?
Are you trying to blame all arab misery on Astonp?
Again a nice example how silly and simply biassed leftwing people can be.Screaming for attentio and nothing to give nor share.
There will be no democracy anywhere in arab world Rumpil....because that is not wat Islam is about! And the majority of people living there are so called muslim; they are not allowed to vote independendly or against islam. so no freedom no democracy no human rights...
The only country where muslim/arabs do have right as people is Israel! Yes, of all countries, their big rival, Israel , has laws providing right for all. In all muslim countries the law forbids even this.
totally bogus what I read here...what is the question?
Are you trying to blame all arab misery on Astonp?
Again a nice example how silly and simply biassed leftwing people can be.Screaming for attentio and nothing to give nor share.
There will be no democracy anywhere in arab world Rumpil....because that is not wat Islam is about! And the majority of people living there are so called muslim; they are not allowed to vote independendly or against islam. so no freedom no democracy no human rights...
The only country where muslim/arabs do have right as people is Israel! Yes, of all countries, their big rival, Israel , has laws providing right for all. In all muslim countries the law forbids even this.
