Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
 Topic closed!!!

Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD

2011-09-28 17:15:29
State shall try play role of speculants but for me is major problem that potential losses will be public, not only private. And Czech or Greek state are experts on losses. Its like if you want have democracy with its flaws or give (some?) power to monarch.
(edited)
2011-09-28 17:40:19
Most absurd anti-investing tax ever.

http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/World/20110917/european-union-weighs-tax-on-financial-transactions-110917/

...as well as make banks share the burden of bailouts
How stupid they are? Do they think that banks will cut it from its profits? Of course not, they will raise own prices for goods and services. This will worsen crisis and mostly to small clients.
2011-09-28 19:11:23
nop,need investors and European(eurozone) Government Bond not austerity and speculants '' naked cds ''
european leaders could solve the debt crisis and make the next step from eurozone to '' u.s.e( like u.s.a) .but playing with fire "betting" on the euro ,


A credit default swap (CDS) is similar to a traditional insurance policy, in as much as it obliges the seller of the CDS to compensate the buyer in the event of loan default. Generally, this involves an exchange or "swap" of the defaulted loan instrument (and with it the right to recover the default loan
but also naked cds
the hedge fund did not own debt of risky loan default . A CDS in which the buyer does not own the underlying debt is referred to as a naked credit default swap, estimated to be up to 80% of the credit default swap market


2011-09-28 19:28:28
Most absurd anti-investing tax ever

why?
when I buy something on a market I pay taxes on it..
why financiary products must be different?
2011-09-28 19:30:00
This will worsen crisis and mostly to small clients.

I disagree, this will turn money investiments in productively business.
Who deserve credit will have it.
2011-09-28 21:16:01
Because you should tax the added value (like when you buy something in a market), not the product itself. If you know how VAT works, you'll know what I mean.
2011-09-28 21:27:34
Because you should tax the added value.

why?
tax income..
2011-09-28 21:32:14
Because it is in my opinion wrong to tax something you have. You have to tax the profit you make of it.

So when a couch is sold 6 times (from basis product over distributors to the final customer), the couch should be taxed 6 times then? As it is 6 times an income for someone. (this is just an example)
2011-09-28 21:36:45
I said tax the income (I don't know if it's the right word I mean the revenues minus the outputs)
If something is sold 6 times you must tax only the income of every seller..
2011-09-28 21:39:18
Than you tax it 6 times ... That is not how VAT works.
2011-09-28 21:48:29
ok.
but you must do it with every kind of revenue..

If you make money with work (NOW) your taxation is stronger than if you make the same money with buy-sell of financial instruments...
Why?
2011-09-28 21:50:43
Not on revenues, on profits and added values.
Gay pride parade ban 'dark day for human rights'
Latest update: 02/10/2011

Serbian gay activists and human rights organisation Amnesty International have roundly condemned the Serbian government for banning a planned gay pride parade in Belgrade. Last year's parade was followed by violent riots in the Serbian capital.

AFP - Serbia's gay activists warned on Saturday the ban on this weekend's gay pride parade was a huge blow for human rights in the Balkans country, but vowed to prepare for a march next year.

"This is a sad day for Serbia, and not one but one hundred steps back for human rights in this country," said Jovanka Todorovic, one of the pride organisers.

On Friday, Serbian authorities banned the gay pride parade and a number of counter protests because of security concerns.

It is the second time in three years that a gay pride parade is unable to go ahead in Serbia because of threats by ultra-nationalists. Several extremist organisations had called for anti-parade protests on Saturday and Sunday, which are now also banned.

In 2010 Serbia held its first gay pride in ten years but violent riots followed. More than 150 people, mostly police officers, were wounded in clashes between security forces and ultra-nationalists and hooligans, which caused substantial damage to the centre of Belgrade.

"This is a defeat for all citizens of Serbia: today, it's the gays, tomorrow, God knows which minority group," organiser Goran Miletic told reporters.

But the activists pledged to keep on with preparations for the pride parade in 2012, while indicating they might take legal measures against the state before the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.

"This is the least we can do in order to protect our constitutional rights before justice... And we are ready to prepare and organise the pride next year," Miletic said.

Instead of marching, the activists briefly halted traffic in a central Belgrade avenue by spreading a pink banner saying "Love, normally," and pouring cans with so-called "rainbow" paints on the street.

No incidents were reported during the brief performance, while police stood by.

Amnesty International said the Serbian authorities' decision to ban the pride was a "dark day for human rights."

"The Serbian authorities... have bowed to pressure from right-wing groups who have failed to understand or respect the rights to freedom of expression set out in the Serbian constitution and law," the group said in a statement.

"Instead of rainbow flags in Serbia, it is a dark day for human rights," it added.

The ban on the pride march "violates the Serbian government’s obligations to guarantee freedom of expression and assembly... (It) undermines the right to non-discrimination," the group said.

http://www.france24.com/en/20111002-gay-pride-parade-ban-serbia-belgrade-amnesty-international
2011-10-02 21:06:36
Bad news for freedom...
2011-10-02 21:09:15
It's not that I have smth specially against gays,but I don't support those parades...I'm heterosexual,so what,I don't organise parades and I don't show my 'pride'
2011-10-02 21:12:43
Is also not needed if you don't belong to an oppressed minority, right? ;)