Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD
anyway, it is interesting like like "rebels" fighting for freedom, democracy and better life condition massacre him....
ok, now we can watch what western world give really for Lybia and after 15 years we can copy this story and teach ourselves :-)
ok, now we can watch what western world give really for Lybia and after 15 years we can copy this story and teach ourselves :-)
I don't understand what you think is interesting about that. I have problems understanding the, sometimes crazy, links you make between things that aren't in any way comparable ...
And I hope the Dutch don't have to kill a dictator who took control and will start terrorizing us, but I don't think that will happen in the near future :P
And I hope the Dutch don't have to kill a dictator who took control and will start terrorizing us, but I don't think that will happen in the near future :P
It was sarcasm...there is nothing intersting, it just show us what kind of evil take power there ....
So? Serbia has no legitimate jurisdiction in Kosovo.
And IF you Serbians want to join EU (you are an official candidate-member now), you'll have to accept Kosovo's independence. Just like you had to find Mladic etc. If you refuse to do so (if you refuse to accept an independent Kosovo) you'll never be part of EU. Your choice.
So the EU blackmail independent states such as Serbia for the expressed the EU opinion, not his own. And this is really a very "democratic".
So the EU blackmail independent states such as Serbia for the expressed the EU opinion, not his own. And this is really a very "democratic".
It has nothing to do with democracy. If you call that blackmailing, then EU has blackmailed Serbia before, because they said they had to try to find Mladic etc. or there wouldn't be any possibility of Serbia joining EU. And I think the EU should recognize countries, not the 27 members recognizing countries by their own. One Europe, one voice.
(edited)
(edited)
If europe speaks it has been debated before expressing the opinion. So if the EU demands such things it is the will of the leaders of the countries (majority => democracy) who have been elected in the different member-states (democratic, isn't it?)
I do not "get"your sarcasm...is t that when evil will return in power in Lybia that you immediately blame "the west"? let's see what the west will do now? come on, let's see what islamic world will do next...
Kosovo is in my opinion a good example of how the USA (not EU) is opportunistic in who they support and when and how...they needed a state they could "control" (just a sate tat would allow their flights without questioning)...so they went for independent Kosovo.
Here we See how the middle east conflict should not be handled; there is an islamic state called Albania....but the muslims thought it is not enough...through the ages they created and claimed a majority in (low populated) areas in Serbia. Wherever they took asmall majority, or even sooner, they scared Serbs and others awa with terror.
And now, artificially, the USA, decides it's independence..clearly as much a leson for the Serbs as much as opportunism for the "West" ...I agree.
wether this is good governance or bad, we iwll have to see...but to merely see of Serbians with cheap remarks about "kosovo has nothing to do with Serbia" is wrong.that's all.
Kosovo is in my opinion a good example of how the USA (not EU) is opportunistic in who they support and when and how...they needed a state they could "control" (just a sate tat would allow their flights without questioning)...so they went for independent Kosovo.
Here we See how the middle east conflict should not be handled; there is an islamic state called Albania....but the muslims thought it is not enough...through the ages they created and claimed a majority in (low populated) areas in Serbia. Wherever they took asmall majority, or even sooner, they scared Serbs and others awa with terror.
And now, artificially, the USA, decides it's independence..clearly as much a leson for the Serbs as much as opportunism for the "West" ...I agree.
wether this is good governance or bad, we iwll have to see...but to merely see of Serbians with cheap remarks about "kosovo has nothing to do with Serbia" is wrong.that's all.
Here we See how the middle east conflict should not be handled; there is an islamic state called Albania....but the muslims thought it is not enough...through the ages they created and claimed a majority in (low populated) areas in Serbia. Wherever they took asmall majority, or even sooner, they scared Serbs and others awa with terror.
So why not give it back to the Illyrians? Because the Serbs took the land from them in the 5th century. Seriously, states change, certainly before the 20th century, it was common to do so. There is only one reason for your reactionary vision, and that is that the Albanians/Kosovans are in majority Muslims and you as religious person see Islam as a 'threat' for (in your point of view) Christian Europe.
If I would follow your logic, I could ask French Flanders back from France. And Zeelandic Flanders back from the Netherlands, you agree?
wether this is good governance or bad, we iwll have to see...but to merely see of Serbians with cheap remarks about "kosovo has nothing to do with Serbia" is wrong.that's all.
Serbia has no power at all in Kosovo, so it's pointless to say Kosovo is a part of Serbia.
(edited)
So why not give it back to the Illyrians? Because the Serbs took the land from them in the 5th century. Seriously, states change, certainly before the 20th century, it was common to do so. There is only one reason for your reactionary vision, and that is that the Albanians/Kosovans are in majority Muslims and you as religious person see Islam as a 'threat' for (in your point of view) Christian Europe.
If I would follow your logic, I could ask French Flanders back from France. And Zeelandic Flanders back from the Netherlands, you agree?
wether this is good governance or bad, we iwll have to see...but to merely see of Serbians with cheap remarks about "kosovo has nothing to do with Serbia" is wrong.that's all.
Serbia has no power at all in Kosovo, so it's pointless to say Kosovo is a part of Serbia.
(edited)
Europe is one, but consists of several independent, sovereign states.
Serbia is a sovereign state which has the right to not recognize a freak such as Kosovo, for obvious reasons.
This is another proof that the union under the name of the EU is a political failure, and sooner or later fall apart.
Serbia is a sovereign state which has the right to not recognize a freak such as Kosovo, for obvious reasons.
This is another proof that the union under the name of the EU is a political failure, and sooner or later fall apart.
West helped rebels, west gave them guns and helped get power, so I would like think that west know people who are supporting.
When one joins EU, one gives up a bit of sovereignty. If one refuses to do so, one shouldn't be part of EU.
And which obvious reasons?
(edited)
And which obvious reasons?
(edited)
No, it doesn't work like that here. All the western democracys are characterized by short term policy. They didn't want Khadafi anymore, so they support the rebels. If they don't like the new gouvernement they will search something else.
Simular as Afghanistan. First they support Taliban against Russia, then they didn't like the Taliban anymore and support thier opponents :-).
Simular as Afghanistan. First they support Taliban against Russia, then they didn't like the Taliban anymore and support thier opponents :-).
When one joins EU, one gives up a bit of sovereignty.
And should not.
If one refuses to do so, one shouldn't be part of EU.
Of course he should. He should be part of the EU, the organization of free trade, free labor market. Not artificial political creature wanting to represent and create in the same way the policy the Netherlands, Romania, and Sweden. Because each country has the right to pursue their own policies and preventing it is a crime.
And should not.
If one refuses to do so, one shouldn't be part of EU.
Of course he should. He should be part of the EU, the organization of free trade, free labor market. Not artificial political creature wanting to represent and create in the same way the policy the Netherlands, Romania, and Sweden. Because each country has the right to pursue their own policies and preventing it is a crime.
And should not.
You know when you ask to be part of EU that you'll have to give up some sovereignty. That's how we created the EU. If you don't want that, just stay out of EU. You can still apply for Schengen Area etc. But of course, if you want to be part of Schengen Area, you'll have to apply the European POV on migration. Europe will be strong or will not be.
Preventing a country to pursue their own policies on certain matter when the country agrees with the restrictions, is not a crime.
(edited)
You know when you ask to be part of EU that you'll have to give up some sovereignty. That's how we created the EU. If you don't want that, just stay out of EU. You can still apply for Schengen Area etc. But of course, if you want to be part of Schengen Area, you'll have to apply the European POV on migration. Europe will be strong or will not be.
Preventing a country to pursue their own policies on certain matter when the country agrees with the restrictions, is not a crime.
(edited)