Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD
But IAEA report it. 7 countries measured that radioactivity ...
German article
http://www.focus.de/gesundheit/gesundheits-news/radioaktivitaet-in-europa-quelle-laut-iaea-vermutlich-in-ungarn_aid_685510.html
http://www.focus.de/gesundheit/gesundheits-news/radioaktivitaet-in-europa-quelle-laut-iaea-vermutlich-in-ungarn_aid_685510.html
English http://radioactive.eu.com/
Accident happened 11.11., I dont know we our shit media didnt report it until now :-(.
(edited)
Accident happened 11.11., I dont know we our shit media didnt report it until now :-(.
(edited)
11.11. is day of accident and IEAE had to find source somewhere in central europe, it takes a week cos deliquent - company close to Budapest was just quite :(
(edited)
(edited)
This is quite old news ... It was in the news here last week that probably the radioactivity measured in Poland - Czech Republic - Sweden - Denmark was from a leak in Hungary.
Yes, and now they know exactly where and Why..
Yes, and now they know exactly where and Why..
Let's blame Iran!! ;)
Let's blame Iran!! ;)
Who referred to Iran?
This story was about leakage, and if anything is in question it is about the responsibility and manipulation of public information by authorities and research institutions.
Can you compare it to the Iran issue?
If you can, then which would be the criteria?
In potential damage proportion?
In declared aggression?
This story was about leakage, and if anything is in question it is about the responsibility and manipulation of public information by authorities and research institutions.
Can you compare it to the Iran issue?
If you can, then which would be the criteria?
In potential damage proportion?
In declared aggression?
I think Iran is not dangerous until time Israel will not get taste to make war..... but you will have opposite opinion :-)
But aggressor is always that who start attacking first and Israel has war problems/conflicts with all neighbors every month, at least what I read in newspaper ...
Anyway... what do you think will happen in next 10-20 years in your region ?
Two question:
FIRST:
1. US and Israel will attack Iran .
2. Iran will attack Israel. (personally I dont believe that this is possible in next 10-20 years)
3. No war, but always small conflicts, always tense situation...every day some dead people....
4. They will grow up and start to live in peace :-D ?
Second question:
1. Iran will use nuclear energy but no weapons.
2. Iran will use nuclear energy but one day they will say, we are not worried about attacking form US cos we have nuclear weapons too for our defense.
3. Iran will use nuclear energy but one day they will say, we are not worried about attacking form US and will start land attack on maybe Israel but US will not help cos they will threaten world by their nuclear weapon.
4. Iran will use nuclear energy but one day they will start attack on Israel and they will use also nuclear weapon in worst case.
5. Iran will stop use nuclear energy and no weaponsand will be selling oil for food and energy :-D
6. After Israel find out that Iran has more nuclear weapons, they will start nuclear attack as first.
I think that 3 is actual for first but with one leg in 1.
and in second question 3(35%) or 4(30%) or 6.(35%)
What do others think ?
But aggressor is always that who start attacking first and Israel has war problems/conflicts with all neighbors every month, at least what I read in newspaper ...
Anyway... what do you think will happen in next 10-20 years in your region ?
Two question:
FIRST:
1. US and Israel will attack Iran .
2. Iran will attack Israel. (personally I dont believe that this is possible in next 10-20 years)
3. No war, but always small conflicts, always tense situation...every day some dead people....
4. They will grow up and start to live in peace :-D ?
Second question:
1. Iran will use nuclear energy but no weapons.
2. Iran will use nuclear energy but one day they will say, we are not worried about attacking form US cos we have nuclear weapons too for our defense.
3. Iran will use nuclear energy but one day they will say, we are not worried about attacking form US and will start land attack on maybe Israel but US will not help cos they will threaten world by their nuclear weapon.
4. Iran will use nuclear energy but one day they will start attack on Israel and they will use also nuclear weapon in worst case.
5. Iran will stop use nuclear energy and no weaponsand will be selling oil for food and energy :-D
6. After Israel find out that Iran has more nuclear weapons, they will start nuclear attack as first.
I think that 3 is actual for first but with one leg in 1.
and in second question 3(35%) or 4(30%) or 6.(35%)
What do others think ?
The moment Iran attacks Israel, they (Iran) are dead. I don't think they'll do it.
Rumpil, I don't think you can predict what is going to happen. It's not a game anyway.
Iran in several indirect ways, already attacks Israel. Missiles in Lebanon and Gaza are supplied in huge amounts by Iran and operated under their supervision. In the middle east declarations sometimes come instead of action, but they clearly state that they intend to wipe Israel from the map (with these words), and I have to take them seriously.
Unfortunately they back up their threats by developing nuclear weapons, and building up more and more missiles - tactic and strategic.
If leaders of countries clearly express their intentions, who are you or myself to predict the future?
I really hope that your option 4 (in first question) becomes the reality, because such war will not be limited to the middle east only.
Iran in several indirect ways, already attacks Israel. Missiles in Lebanon and Gaza are supplied in huge amounts by Iran and operated under their supervision. In the middle east declarations sometimes come instead of action, but they clearly state that they intend to wipe Israel from the map (with these words), and I have to take them seriously.
Unfortunately they back up their threats by developing nuclear weapons, and building up more and more missiles - tactic and strategic.
If leaders of countries clearly express their intentions, who are you or myself to predict the future?
I really hope that your option 4 (in first question) becomes the reality, because such war will not be limited to the middle east only.
err... rumpil... do you know that are THREE countries between Israel and Iran? Small conflicts on a daily basis, directly between Israel and Iran has never really happened, nor will they...
I just wasn't sure you were aware of that, considering the phrasing of your sentences.
================
rumpil: "I think Iran is not dangerous until time Israel will not get taste to make war..... but you will have opposite opinion :-) "
I completely agree. Iran is not dangerous at all.
And... Israel will only get a taste for war against Iran when we run out of Palestinian children. Our supply of those seems to be OK atm.
Thanks for your concern. ;-)
(edited)
I just wasn't sure you were aware of that, considering the phrasing of your sentences.
================
rumpil: "I think Iran is not dangerous until time Israel will not get taste to make war..... but you will have opposite opinion :-) "
I completely agree. Iran is not dangerous at all.
And... Israel will only get a taste for war against Iran when we run out of Palestinian children. Our supply of those seems to be OK atm.
Thanks for your concern. ;-)
(edited)