Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD

Don't mention the war!

I think that world should really do something..... no matter that there are not rich natural resources....

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/story/2011-11-19/syria-attacks/51309702/1

or just Turkey will "solve it" and I dont know if this is the best solution:

http://www.jpost.com/MiddleEast/Article.aspx?id=246184

Arab league gave ultimatum with its end on Saturday:
http://www.dp-news.com/en/detail.aspx?articleid=103557

but the worst thing could be if Syria will be pretex/pretend for new regional war there....
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/19/us-iran-israel-usa-idUSTRE7AI0UF20111119

News from that region are worse and worse every week... this can have very bad end, or just I am worried about it ?

Well, during the cold war enough nukes were aimed at the US, some NATO countries and USSR to destroy the world more then 50 times, but nothing happened, it almost did happened, but it didn't. Pakistan and India have nukes aimed at each other but nothing happened till now because they both know that firing nukes will also destroy their own country as retaliation. And probably Iran won't push the button either as they know israel and the US have nukes aimed at them. It is even possible that it gives more stability as israel will need to do a step down as they won't be the only 1 with nukes in the region anymore, but also a real enemy.

Nuclear nuke in Iran is not necessary end of world, but its another risk factor. World is already in fear if in instable Pakistan won´t terrorists get nukes or North Korea will not directly provide them. When there is still possibility, its worthy to destroy it by any means.

But here they can start land attack and force world by nuclear threat stay out.... And then after one will definitelly losing then they can use nuclear weapon as last option for "survive".

Now they have small nukes also, which can be good for small area with maybe less amount of radiation but such a weapons are dangerous too, one bomb will not be last, for sure :(

Imho north kórea is not dangerous, they can hurt just south kórea, so no worldwide problem.
Same is irán, they dont have such a long rockets for nuclear weapon.

Ohh come on rumpil, please read about the subject you're talking about, before making an opinion...
Iran has Shihab and Zilzal rockets/missiles with a 3000km range.
North Korea is extremely dangerous and Iran is even worse.

Did you see some succesful test ?

Is doing a succesful test necessary to be dangerous?

North korea? They can hit japan maybe but not USA or europe :)

I have nuclear weapon and ballist rocket which is able hit Mars. Am I dangerous?

3000 km of range is theoretically enough to hit southern Germany.

They can use better oil for 4000km :) :)

These are the missiles and range:



And these are the US bases near Iran, and Iran knows this (Aircraft carriers are not on this picture).


(edited)

If you have the knowledge and the capacity to fire those weapons, yes.