Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD

Russia and Chine are not sending there weapons and making that conflict worse as US is doing now.
I am not sure, but do more weapon solve it faster ?

I am sure, that there is some economic or war policy reason, this is again not about "democracy". I think that Syria is good natural way how to "world" (so not just US) can attack Iran and Russia and Chine dont want let continue this western aggression. But maybe I am wrong.....

What I know as sure is that terrorist are here only cos two things:
1. they live all life in war region, from their childhoods
2. and have guns !
If US is constantly supporter of war and sending there weapons, who is supporter of terrorist then ???

I am not sure, but do more weapon solve it faster ?

Depends on what is the wanted outcome.

If US is constantly supporter of war and sending there weapons, who is supporter of terrorist then ???

Look, I won't even try to defend what the States have done in the past 60 years (put their acts in some perspective, would you?), but this is a really stupid remark. Leave the drugs for what they are.

U.S.A supports war every one knows that but they do have a point syria's dictator need to be taken down but it should not be them who does it maybe the E.U is a better pick

It depends on meaning of word dictator, if it is everybody who will not accept war threats of US, then yes :-)
I am dictator too :-D.

Did some of us think about who support and start there war conflict ? Or it is just random, that after previous war (iraq, lybia) ended we have new one :-) ??

So we should just let Assad get away with killing the civilians of Syria ?

Dont be ridiculous.

Guns dont kill people, people do.

So even if the USA would sell all the guns/weapons they have to Syria, Assad and his army are still the ones that are pulling the trigger ergo they are wrong!.

So we should just let Assad get away with killing the civilians of Syria ?

If smb is not supporting that conflict by money and weapon, there would be already no conflict.
And not people kill, but people with guns only. I am man too, but I am not able kill somebody without gun :-). Even if I want kill some maybe :-DD

You forgot how US libertate Lybia, where people live under strong leader but in peace and quite happy life with bigger social "security" as Slovakia has :-).

Now after they are free, they are still dying and some are starving, just main media didnt write about this failure. Syria is same case, just Russia and Chine said strong no.

If smb is not supporting that conflict by money and weapon, there would be already no conflict.

And they all lived happily ever after. Stop telling fairy tales. This is like saying: if the allied forces didn't have money and weapons (delivered by the US!) in WWII, there wouldn't have been a conflict. Slovakians would have lived happily ever after under the Nazi-regime. At least, if they weren't exterminated for being Untermenschen.

I think a possible intervention should be done by the Arab League. Although I have no idea if they do such things. Hopefully the west won't mess up things as they did in Libya.

useless map..... if you destroyed me or my nation, I would make bomb attacks too and I would teach it also my kids...

dont talk about negatives of US aggression, consequences, talk rather about reasons for that aggression...

show me that table with dead bodies please :-) !
result will be much different...

Are you really that naive ?

IF the US stops selling weapons to syria somebody else wil, plenty options enough for syria.

who ? Russia and Chine support government, just US and EU support terrorist there... so who ??

Iran vs USA between 1945 and 1991 should be USSR vs USA (or USSR + China vs USA in Asia), the time of the Cold War and many in that list were supported by 1 of these 2 or 3 countries ;) And even after 1991, specially the fall of the USSR, the Cold War had some influence on wars that happened.

(edited)

It´s not a contest, it is showing what is the terrorstate ;)