Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD

It´s not a contest, it is showing what is the terrorstate ;)

The problem is that in Syria the goverment is actually the one with the terroist actions. You cant seriously defend an regime like that.

It says enough that Russia and China are supporting them, not exactly 2 country where freedom of
speech and human rights are on a acceptble level and that is an understatement.

No answer to my message, no? ;-)

And they all lived happily ever after. Stop telling fairy tales. This is like saying: if the allied forces didn't have money and weapons (delivered by the US!) in WWII, there wouldn't have been a conflict. Slovakians would have lived happily ever after under the Nazi-regime. At least, if they weren't exterminated for being Untermenschen.

I read.that about slovaks just now,.i am laughing on it, I will answer,.just wait sokker has fb bug during writing from mobiles....i had to go on computer...

1. What did you learn in school about WWII :-) ?? I am sad of quality of your school in germany :-(
You should know, that Russia libertate us, not US :-DDD. That is why we "glory" them.

2. I would rather be under German "nacist" government, than 40years under USSR regtime :-(

3. Not many slovak soldiers died during libertation. We are not, we were not war nation. But, hypothetically, if US libertate us by supporting civil war and maybe 1 million slovak civilians died during such a libertation, nobody would say thx to US, be sure !

and one more sentece.... We divided our common republic called Czechoslovakia into two states without war, in peace, so everybody here should learn how can be things made not by war :-) !!!

1. I ain't German. I didn't go to school in Germany. Yes, the US did not help liberate Europe. They did not!

2. Relevance?

3. Relevance?

and one more sentece.... We divided our common republic called Czechoslovakia into two states without war, in peace, so everybody here should learn how can be things made not by war :-) !!!

Relevance?

sorry, I just see flag, you have similar, sorry :-)

relevance ???

you wrote this:

if the allied forces didn't have money and weapons (delivered by the US!) in WWII, there wouldn't have been a conflict. Slovakians would have lived happily ever after under the Nazi-regime.

if the allied forces didn't have money and weapons (delivered by the US!) in WWII, there wouldn't have been a conflict. Slovakians would have lived happily ever after under the Nazi-regime.

One with a brain of course understands that one should not take this so literally. What was meant by this is that you - if you are consequent - should reject the help the States gave Europe (believe me, they did this big time; during and after the war) during WWII. That Slovakia was in Eastern Europe and therefore under Soviet influence (who refused the American help after the war) is really irrelevant to that matter.

we dont have oil and dont have strategic position, so we can not never await US help so I dont know what to say.....

But it doesnt matter if US or Russia, both will always just abuse weaker nations! In this case (syria) same as Iraq or Lybia it is always just about power, resources and so... one is aggressor, one not. They are just warring in false name of democracy and liberty, no one of them care life, just resources and strategic plans :-(

we dont have oil and dont have strategic position, so we can not never await US help so I dont know what to say.....

Maybe it would be better if you didn't say anything at all. It would be better for your image.

I dont care about my image, I care about reality :-)

You could have fooled me.

What do you think people about Assange, wikileaks and the last news:

http://internacional.elpais.com/internacional/2012/08/14/actualidad/1344931556_599722.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/aug/15/uk-arrest-julian-assange-wikileaks-ecuador

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/aug/15/uk-arrest-julian-assange-wikileaks-ecuador


(edited)

I think it's a crime to hunt down whistleblowers. And Assange isn't even a whistleblower, he offered whistleblowers the possibility to speak out, he is a journalist who wants total transparency. And I understand why he wants to keep out of the hands of the US, knowing how inhuman Pfc. Bradley Manning is treated in custody. The US just want to take revenge for leaking painfull information like acts against humanity committed by the US and other government wrongdoing (btw, not only by the US but many other governments and institutions world wide), and probably also to frighten those who can/want to leak this kind of information in the future. It's all an attack on free journalism and freedom of speech.

So, the allegations of sexual offences is just a cheap accusation to get him into a country that can sent him to the US. I think this statement of the Swedish authorities is very clear prove of that:

An offer to the Swedish authorities by Ecuador for investigators to interview Assange inside the London embassy was rejected. (Last line in the article of the guardian.co.uk)

And the threats of the British goverment to invade the Ecuadorean embassy is completely out of line.
(edited)

yes i think is the same way, its sad free press only really free if it dosent affect the big fishes that