Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD
2. rebellions are not from the people, I am sure this is US operation which just support rebelions
It's interesting, becouse in my opinion, this "revolution" was created by peoples affiliated with Al Quaeda.
It's interesting, becouse in my opinion, this "revolution" was created by peoples affiliated with Al Quaeda.
And you're both wrong :)
It are the people that are unhappy, without jobs, without money, without enough affordable food, without democracy, without many freedoms etc etc, and they started all these revolutions in these North African and Middle East countries.
It are the people that are unhappy, without jobs, without money, without enough affordable food, without democracy, without many freedoms etc etc, and they started all these revolutions in these North African and Middle East countries.
It are the people that are unhappy,
If somebody is unhappy, becouse a girlfriend left him, he should kill the president?
without jobs
They should find a job, not kill president.
without money,
They should earn money, not kill president
without democracy
Then they should be a very lucky:)
without many freedoms
A man don't need many freedoms. A man need a food and house and then he is a happy.
I'm too old to believe in the spontaneous reactions of the population. For such events usually face other forces who use the "revolutions" to achieve their goals. Examples - Romania (89), Afghanistan (92) and many others.
PS. How do this unemployed, unhappy, ill-fed people have weapons that they still try Gaddafi's forces?
If somebody is unhappy, becouse a girlfriend left him, he should kill the president?
without jobs
They should find a job, not kill president.
without money,
They should earn money, not kill president
without democracy
Then they should be a very lucky:)
without many freedoms
A man don't need many freedoms. A man need a food and house and then he is a happy.
I'm too old to believe in the spontaneous reactions of the population. For such events usually face other forces who use the "revolutions" to achieve their goals. Examples - Romania (89), Afghanistan (92) and many others.
PS. How do this unemployed, unhappy, ill-fed people have weapons that they still try Gaddafi's forces?
Now it's the people that are the problem, 1 post before it was al-Qaeda ... strange ...
EDIT: rest of your post isn't worth answering. First get your facts straight.
(edited)
EDIT: rest of your post isn't worth answering. First get your facts straight.
(edited)
Yes, you try talking about facts, not propaganda about unlucky, poor peoples without money for food, but with money for guns.
Your hate against muslims isn't enough for a desent discussion, I need real facts, no speculations and lies like you are doing. Show me this revelutions has nothing to do with unhappy people (like they are telling us) but all with al-Qaeda (like you are telling us). When I turn on the tv I see happy people singing for freedom, or isn't this also true. This is all 1 large muslim plot, right? :P
You shouldn't use the word propaganda as every post of yours about the bad muslims is your propaganda.
And about those weapons, you know weapons aren't worth anything in Africa do you? Or the weapons on militairy bases that are taken over by the people ...
You shouldn't use the word propaganda as every post of yours about the bad muslims is your propaganda.
And about those weapons, you know weapons aren't worth anything in Africa do you? Or the weapons on militairy bases that are taken over by the people ...
Minister of foreign affairs of Libya has proclaimed a cease-fire.
It's now clear this were just words, Benghazi is still under fire.
I wonder how long it's going to take before the resolution is carried out. England and France are moving millitairy so it won't take long anymore I think.
It's now clear this were just words, Benghazi is still under fire.
I wonder how long it's going to take before the resolution is carried out. England and France are moving millitairy so it won't take long anymore I think.
It started :)
Breaking News: French president says leaders meeting in Paris agreed to apply "all means necessary" to implement no-fly zone.
Liveblog aljazeera.net
(edited)
Breaking News: French president says leaders meeting in Paris agreed to apply "all means necessary" to implement no-fly zone.
Liveblog aljazeera.net
(edited)
Wow, Khadaffi is using citizens as human shield to protect the anti-aircraft guns. Really 1 of the lowest forms of defense. The Libyan state tv is telling these people are volunteers ...
EDIT: also human shields at the airport and Khadaffi's offices.
(edited)
EDIT: also human shields at the airport and Khadaffi's offices.
(edited)
so kaddafi are killing that people and not that rockets,aircraft guns or bombs, right :)??
Human shield is a military and political term describing the deliberate placement of civilians in or around combat targets to deter an enemy from attacking those targets. It may also refer to the use of civilians to literally shield combatants during attacks, by forcing the civilians to march in front of the soldiers. This is done in the hope that the other party will be reluctant to attack them. Furthermore, if the other party attacks these targets anyway, the resulting civilian casualties have propaganda value.
Using this technique increases the civilian casualty rate and is illegal by any nation that is party to the Fourth Geneva Convention.
wiki - Human shield (also used by Taliban, Israel, Hezbollah, Hamas etc, let's say the immorals)
(edited)
Using this technique increases the civilian casualty rate and is illegal by any nation that is party to the Fourth Geneva Convention.
wiki - Human shield (also used by Taliban, Israel, Hezbollah, Hamas etc, let's say the immorals)
(edited)
I understand, but you not! just read once more my question.
The Israelian Army would never use a thing like a human shield. This is just plain wrong. As well as calling them immorals. Get your facts right.
one side is, that somebody use human shied - this very ugly and poor
second side is, that somebody launch attack in spite of the fact that there is human shield - this very ugly and poor..
both are ugly, both should shame !
(it is same as if I shoot you by gun, who will be murder, me or that man who produce that gun ? Of course me ! Kaddafi maybe use human shield, because he is dirty pig, but murders are that pilots and forces and chief, not Kaddafi,.... just to be correct :-) truth is just one :-) Of course Kaddafi and his forces are killing too.. as I said he is pig, but i dont agree with the fact that just Kaddafi is murder, forces operating there if attack human shield are dirty pigs too !!! That is all. )
second side is, that somebody launch attack in spite of the fact that there is human shield - this very ugly and poor..
both are ugly, both should shame !
(it is same as if I shoot you by gun, who will be murder, me or that man who produce that gun ? Of course me ! Kaddafi maybe use human shield, because he is dirty pig, but murders are that pilots and forces and chief, not Kaddafi,.... just to be correct :-) truth is just one :-) Of course Kaddafi and his forces are killing too.. as I said he is pig, but i dont agree with the fact that just Kaddafi is murder, forces operating there if attack human shield are dirty pigs too !!! That is all. )