Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
 Topic closed!!!

Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD

2011-03-19 19:38:15
one side is, that somebody use human shied - this very ugly and poor
second side is, that somebody launch attack in spite of the fact that there is human shield - this very ugly and poor..

both are ugly, both should shame !


(it is same as if I shoot you by gun, who will be murder, me or that man who produce that gun ? Of course me ! Kaddafi maybe use human shield, because he is dirty pig, but murders are that pilots and forces and chief, not Kaddafi,.... just to be correct :-) truth is just one :-) Of course Kaddafi and his forces are killing too.. as I said he is pig, but i dont agree with the fact that just Kaddafi is murder, forces operating there if attack human shield are dirty pigs too !!! That is all. )
2011-03-19 20:07:10
So what do you propose to solve this problem?
Do you want to go there and remove the human shield by hand?
2011-03-19 20:08:03
Just google it, if you don't believe me :) I have my facts straight, and you? ;)
2011-03-19 20:33:53
You are 1 step to far, this is how it is:

(it is same as if I shoot you by gun, who will be murder, me or that man who produce that gun ? Of course me ! Kaddafi maybe use human shield. /END. Everything after this is all to blame on those who use human shields. For example: it's impossible to see dozens of people around anti-aircraft guns if the Allies shoot from dozens or hunderds of miles away at MILLITARY installations.

(edited)
2011-03-19 21:04:45
i dont want to solve it.. i want just show you, that it is not black and white problem.. good and bad... killing and liberation ... that is all.. we all should see truth.....

Kaddafi is pig, but govs and army units which attack army targets no matter that there are human shields are much bigger pigs... because that second one is killing, first one use just dirty army tactics.

So no solution, just it is not about one is bad and the other is good (no matter that second one is just murder)
2011-03-19 21:07:04
Again, you can't blame the one shooting at milltary installations were civillians are used as shield. How could you know these people are there? And how do you know these people aren't soldiers? Civillians should be kept away by the regime, if not, that regime is to blame, really no 1 else.

You have rules in war, and this is 1 of them.
(edited)
2011-03-19 21:12:18
because that second one is killing


Gadaffi is also killing. And what about that the rebels first are Al Qaeda members, then that they are sold to western countries....Gadaffi remember: if you say one lie mantain it! xD never was easier to catch a lier
2011-03-19 21:12:55
I was wrong there, didn't knew about that incident. But thats what it was an incident, the soldiers who did it where put on trial. With what you wrote you are implying it happens usually which is wrong.
2011-03-19 22:15:15
I told you... both are killers and pigs... I just hate that stories that other side which click on button fire in aircraft are that good one :-(

(they now it, they see it, they can see colour of your eyes.. )
2011-03-19 22:17:25
again.. I am not telling Kaddafi is good, he is really pig... but aggressor at Lybia is not just Kaddafi... this is not natural rebellions, this is as usual controlled rebellion by the others... and liberation from Nato or EU means just more deads... nothing more...
2011-03-19 22:58:52
kaddafi shoot down fighter.. fighter of rebels !!

How can rebels, unhappy civilians have fighters :-DD ??


(edited)
2011-03-19 23:00:21
some rebels might be former militaries, also the civiliians might've taken control of some military warehouses. simple as that.
2011-03-19 23:26:55
if the rebel was a Palestinian and the local Khadafi listen to the name Peres
Or if the rebel is a Tibetan and you replace the name of Khadafi by Hu
You have 3 times the same story, with 3 times a different reaction

It is all about perception
2011-03-19 23:58:01
yes.. when couple of bribed soldiers of former military decided to change sides... they take some guns, grenades and maybe one aircraft and lunch for journey..

everything is possible...

I am just sad, that we can see more aggressive actions from US in last decade (afganistan, iraq, maybe iran) and now EU is involved in this dirty oil games too :-(. I am really sad of this :-(

And Sarkozy know that nobody will vote him again :-( so he learn very fast from Bush how he can get more votes.. yeah, war is cool... :-((((

really ugly


(and again and again, I think that Kaddari is dirty pig and really not good man..... just for people who think I love him! )
2011-03-20 00:05:52
You forget the massacre of Khadaffi last weeks, he had to be stopped before he killed everyone that is against him, specially when he would have won this war against the Lybian people.

You just don't want to see the other side of the story, you only see bad guys. I'm glade this lonatic is stopped, everyone should. The question is what crazy person will become the next leader. Most of the times the arabs don't get it any better with new leaders, sometimes even worse like Iran.

EDIT: the arab neighbors are also helping so it's really an ally action and not some European-US thing.
(edited)
2011-03-20 02:05:51
yes.. when couple of bribed soldiers of former military decided to change sides...

why would they be bribed...? They could've done it because of their political and social views