Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD

Yes it is hard, high level of communication skills, but try it, then people will.read it :)

I don't care if you read it or not. And it has nothing to do with communication skills. Some issues cannot be discussed in short sentences or a short text. Still trying to do so, is populism. I'm not a fan of it, I understand you are.

most us dont read... but ok..your choice :-)

(to the Mali topic)

France didn't really attack Mali in a way like the US attacked Iraq, did she? They are supporting the local government against the fundamentalist rebels.

they are supporting the local government against the fundamentalist rebels.

you killed me :-DD. US is supporting rebels (al qaeda) against evil in Syria or US is supporting civils against general Quaddafii etc etc :-DD

I like more that story about uran than this :-)

???

Why would these two rule out each other? Uran is the reason why they're there (if that's the truth), supporting the government is what they are doing.

The rebels were pushing back the government before the French went there.

I didn't write anything about Syria or Lybia.

You'll get used to it. Rumpil never lets facts get in the way of a good story.

France is fighting against rebels which they trained up (also with NATO) to be able get down Qaddafi. Mission in Lybia is over and now that rebels turn against them.... simple :-)

so have they right to fight against if they create them ?
They just opened eyes maybe and want get down government which is abusing their natural resources... but who know...it is maybe just story...

You are mixing up things. The Mali rebel forces are based on Tuaregs, who were serving as Kadhafi's soldiers in the Islamic Legion. So they were trained by Lybia and not the French. NATO took out their employer, they went home, and some islamic radicals started their campaign to take over at least Northern Mali using them.

Here is an article: Link

And I still don't say that the uran story is not true. I just haven't heard about it until now.
(edited)

p.s.: What would Lybian rebels do in Mali anyways? They have Lybia now.
(edited)

Or try express.yourself in short and clear sentences :)

In some cases oneliners can be used to clarify examples, but in most cases it is impossible to cover the content with short sentences. So please stop using short sentences and oneliners but be clear about what you're trying to say :/

If you think so .. :).

Russia said on Wednesday the rebels fighting French and African troops in Mali are the same fighters the West armed in the revolt that ousted Muammar Gaddafi in Libya.

"Those whom the French and Africans are fighting now in Mali are the [same] people who overthrew the Gaddafi regime, those that our Western partners armed so that they would overthrow the Gaddafi regime," Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told a news conference.

"It's important to lift one's head a bit and look over the horizon, look at all those processes more widely, they are interconnected and carry very many threats," Lavrov said, speaking of unrest across the Middle East that could play into the hands of militants.

"This will be a time bomb for decades ahead," he said.

but Russia news is lying as usual :-D

Was in our media too, not only in Russia ;-)