Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
 Topic closed!!!

Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD

2011-03-21 22:37:30
US AND EU want just kill Kaddafi and occupy that country in "peace and help program" (something like food for oil, we can see it couple of year ago :-( )

OSN make resolution, but the fact is that EU and US interpret this resolution in their point of view...

we all know how WWII started... Polish army attacked german transmitter... that was official start of war :-DDDD really good reason for WWII.... History didnt teach us/you nothing !!!
2011-03-21 22:37:32
*Sarkozy and Obama going to meet Gaddafi...
- Hey, Muanmar, wazzup, ma nigga?
- everything fine, friends, just a couple of shooting here and there...
- hey, look... we thought better and we think you should stop this... you know, you don't change anything, and you really should stop it... please.
*bang, bang*
A sound in background: headshot*


F*** yeah :D
(edited)
2011-03-21 22:44:27
So no protection of human rights then?

I think human rights are more valuable than a text. So i'm fine with the fact that Belgium sends 6 fighters.
And with that i'll take the fact that you can't make an omelette without breaking eggs.
There will be civilian casualities (i won't participate in 'collateral damage') and i hope they will do everything possible to avoid thatas much as possible.
But if we save 3,000 people by accidentally killing 10 I'm willing to make that sacrifice.
Aren't you?

(btw the germans wanted Lebensraum and they needed an excuse so it's nonsence)
2011-03-21 22:51:42
You do understand that making a no-fly zone possible you need to take out radarinstallations and anti-aircraftguns so the ally fighters can do their work safely? And stop the fighters of Khadaffi take off so the airstrips need to be bombed? etc etc
(edited)
2011-03-21 22:53:09
this is my own....

Sarkozy and Obama going to meet Gaddafi..
- Hey, Muanmar, wazzup, me nigga ?
- I need to kill some of opposite voters in my country.... and you ?
- we need to attack some state to get new votes, can we make a deal ?
- hm... no kill your opposition yourself. Or attack Afghanistan again.
- We dont have money for war, we need attack somebody who has oil for our fighters, so sorry. But we will make just funny flights attack, dont worry we will not start land attacks, our voters love just bombs in TVs.
2011-03-21 22:54:57
ok, you now tell to public, that you can fck OSN and resolution.. very nice !!!!

tell me also that Germans have right to start WWII because of that fiction of attacking transmitter and you will kill me definitely :-(
2011-03-21 22:55:54
Message deleted

2011-03-21 22:55:55
if you really believe to this, I am going rather to bad :-(

But if we save 3,000 people by accidentally killing 10 I'm willing to make that sacrifice.
Aren't you?
2011-03-21 22:57:05
Správa zmazaná


I missed that question.... but it would be better if i go to sleep I think ...
2011-03-21 22:59:11
So you'd kill 3010 people?

The resolution is multi-interpretable isn't it? If it wasn't France and the UK would already have a huge opposition from the UN and NATO.
As far as i know that is not the case. So till then I'll stick with the idea that france and the UK are doing legal things.
2011-03-21 23:03:35
this is more difficult, but If I explain it here at the forum one nation can attack me for that :-) ... so I will send you PM :-)
2011-03-21 23:04:41
This shooting is called, carrying out the resolution, nothing more :) And some countries are maybe a bit shocked by the actual shooting of tomahawks, but no country is sending in his fighters if all grounddefence is still intact. How does a country want to explain 20 very expansive F16's are shot down.
(edited)
2011-03-21 23:06:49
Maybe, but i agree with rumpil the resolution is still controversial. Haven't seen any dutchies in the libyan sky lately ;)

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/8395270-resistance-avert-an-attack-in-misurata-libya
I suggest you read this
(edited)
2011-03-21 23:25:09
how can anybody use rocket to hit just not civilian people... ?
and how can anybody use rockets to hit targets if they know that Kaddafi is using human shields ??

UNO (our OSN) just tell... no fighter at the sky.. if there is some, shoot them down.. but there is nothing about war and so.
UNO tells maybe something like stop Kaddafi using air forces and maybe attack some part of Kaddafi army (but just army without civilians) and let Libyia solve their problems.

Please, we should stop hiding for that glory "human rights" if we are not helping africa for last 1000 years !! did we help build them factories ? Good college education ?? Or Eu and others are just helping Africa by selling our exports and they can pay by their natural resources... try to find if we are really helping africa for last 1000 years..

2011-03-21 23:25:17
good night
2011-03-21 23:36:01
Haven't seen any dutchies in the libyan sky lately ;)

We wait, this isn't dangerous enough for the Dutch troops. Others are much more happy to go, looks like some can't even wait ... we let them ;D

Besides, the Dutch already paid enough to help Afganistan. Many aren't there to help - oohohooh maybe the soldiers get durty or even shot at ;P - So we have to go again ;)
(edited)