Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD
You can never find prove of something that has never excist. That's the whole joke in this story.
It's impossible to prove something that has never been there, simply because it never was around.
People believe because they feel the urge to believe in something bigger then mankind most likely because they are to weak to believe in their own strengt instead of some fairytails.
It's impossible to prove something that has never been there, simply because it never was around.
People believe because they feel the urge to believe in something bigger then mankind most likely because they are to weak to believe in their own strengt instead of some fairytails.
Have you heard about dark energy / dark matter? Not the Star Wars stuff, it's what mainstream astonomists thinking about these days.
Dark energy is theoretically all around us, and it gives a huge part from the complete energy mass (73% according to wiki), but it's constant, so we have never seen, never felt it.
I don't say it's God (probably not), I just gave you an example about things that could exist around us, but we never knew they were here.
P.S.: I'm not weak, I feel fine, thanks!
(edited)
Dark energy is theoretically all around us, and it gives a huge part from the complete energy mass (73% according to wiki), but it's constant, so we have never seen, never felt it.
I don't say it's God (probably not), I just gave you an example about things that could exist around us, but we never knew they were here.
P.S.: I'm not weak, I feel fine, thanks!
(edited)
You would personally physically assault them, but I can't laugh with the Catholic Church? Strange kind of freedom you're using there.
You can laugh at what you want, no problems with that. Your concept of freedom is charged with a crime (pedophilia) in a public forum to a person? I do not share your interpretation of freedom and style of humor, and I think people of your country should not share it.
Greetings.
Greetings.
saying own opinion without permission of supervisor is now forbidden for all catholic priests (except facebook and tweets).
interesting type of free will :-DDD
interesting type of free will :-DDD
Once again, the pope represents the institute of the Catholic Church, not Bergoglio. It's a joke, it's not a serious crime charge.
And your interpretation of freedom is: "I can threat with physical violence but you can't laugh with the Catholic Church by calling the pope Pedophilius". I hope nobody in the worlds shares that interpretation.
And your interpretation of freedom is: "I can threat with physical violence but you can't laugh with the Catholic Church by calling the pope Pedophilius". I hope nobody in the worlds shares that interpretation.
I see you is really difficult to distinguish a crime, a joke and a threat. Considering your limitations in interpreting some ideas prefer to attribute your opinions to that limitation and not continue to insist on make you understand these concepts so simple. I honestly feel sorry for you buddy.
Greetings.
PS: I hope that in your real life you drive with more respect for others.
Greetings.
PS: I hope that in your real life you drive with more respect for others.
I have no respect whatsoever for the Catholic Church. Everyone around me knows that. And people who can't live with that can sod off. People in Belgium are not that Catholic anymore, so nobody has ever complained to me in real life that I lack respect for that institute.
Considering your limitations in interpreting some ideas prefer to attribute your opinions to that limitation and not continue to insist on make you understand these concepts so simple. I honestly feel sorry for you buddy.
Bye
Bye
It is foolish to intervene in a discussion that understand and even worse if they use the words of the enemy. Your comment is really very poor.
Unfortunately not think you understand what I mean.
Greetings.
Unfortunately not think you understand what I mean.
Greetings.
they should be thrown into jail for that. It's nothing else but stealing.
"Radical atheists however claim, they know that God doesn't exist, and who doesn't share their opinion are disrespecting common sense. So your argument is stronger, you should prove it. From my point of view your opinion disrespects human logic, until we find a 100% proof. "
Firstly, I'd imagine that radical atheists don't say that they know god doesn't exist. They'd say that on the balance of probabilities there very, very, very (x1000) probably isn't a god. You're projecting your beliefs onto others there.
Secondly, whilst there still doesn't exist 100% proof either way, it is either malicious or stupid to suggest that we should call it 50/50.
Firstly, I'd imagine that radical atheists don't say that they know god doesn't exist. They'd say that on the balance of probabilities there very, very, very (x1000) probably isn't a god. You're projecting your beliefs onto others there.
Secondly, whilst there still doesn't exist 100% proof either way, it is either malicious or stupid to suggest that we should call it 50/50.