Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD
Read some of the definitions of Science Fiction and you know why books of her are categorized as Science Fiction:
Okay. In what category would you place Marx?
if you have to ignore and rule out well known and common human characteristics which will never correspond with the theory and just can't be ignored and ruled out, can the theory still be valid than?
Is communism a valid theory? If you ask me, yes it is. I hugely reject it, but it's still a valid theory in my opinion. Just like objectivism.
And I critize you because of the way you are propagating it, how you deal with criticism and counter arguments, use a lot of words (and time) on a soccer manager forum but no deeds to actually make your ideology come true, or not that I know of (btw, time on a forum which could also be used to actually do some work as a volunteer and live your ideology in stead of only talking about it), etc. (for more: see last part of my previous post).
You still don't get a shit about what my ideology is. My ideology is not that everyone should do some work as a volunteer. My ideology is that everyone should have the freedom to do with his life, his time and his money what he wants. Doing work as a volunteer is one of the many options. So no, I'm not doing any work as a volunteer. Play the ball, not the man.
Like I said many times before, you're just making the classical leftist argument: moral superiority.
Ofcourse many different concepts of my country (also some politics) has partially made me to who I am today, but I don't live according some political ideology.
Sure you do. You have your opinion. You live by it (I assume and I hope). I live by mine. What's the difference? You seem to make a difference between an ideology and an opinion. An unclear difference if you ask me.
A last thing, about the question I asked you, apparently you choose the first option :/
You seriously expect me to think about myself because you have the same feeling when talking to a religious person? You seriously expect that?
(edited)
Okay. In what category would you place Marx?
if you have to ignore and rule out well known and common human characteristics which will never correspond with the theory and just can't be ignored and ruled out, can the theory still be valid than?
Is communism a valid theory? If you ask me, yes it is. I hugely reject it, but it's still a valid theory in my opinion. Just like objectivism.
And I critize you because of the way you are propagating it, how you deal with criticism and counter arguments, use a lot of words (and time) on a soccer manager forum but no deeds to actually make your ideology come true, or not that I know of (btw, time on a forum which could also be used to actually do some work as a volunteer and live your ideology in stead of only talking about it), etc. (for more: see last part of my previous post).
You still don't get a shit about what my ideology is. My ideology is not that everyone should do some work as a volunteer. My ideology is that everyone should have the freedom to do with his life, his time and his money what he wants. Doing work as a volunteer is one of the many options. So no, I'm not doing any work as a volunteer. Play the ball, not the man.
Like I said many times before, you're just making the classical leftist argument: moral superiority.
Ofcourse many different concepts of my country (also some politics) has partially made me to who I am today, but I don't live according some political ideology.
Sure you do. You have your opinion. You live by it (I assume and I hope). I live by mine. What's the difference? You seem to make a difference between an ideology and an opinion. An unclear difference if you ask me.
A last thing, about the question I asked you, apparently you choose the first option :/
You seriously expect me to think about myself because you have the same feeling when talking to a religious person? You seriously expect that?
(edited)
in spain now there are a enormous problem of loans guaranteed by houses..
and ? Most of that people would never have right to have houses due to their weak economics power. So bank can take that house, sold it and the rest of loan people had to pay back in next years. I dont care if they have where to live. Or your state can make law where is possibility to make personal bankrupcy, so they will lose their house but the rest of loan will be canceled. Bank will have problem too but it is ok, it is also mistake of bank giving big loans to people who are not so economics strong.
You can see that system is ok, just abusing the system is bad.
THAT IS FALSE!
This is a PRIVATE debit crisis.
I dont care if private or state crises it is. It is very same.
NB: numbers invented by some fantasy burocrats, in fact those number are never been explained!I would like the name of your school where you listen this fairy tales :-DD. I dont know exact reason for 3,5% but I suppose that it is because they belive that GDP growing around 3,5% is possible so same loan is ok. But even if my estimation is wrong, be sure that they calculated it :-)
Banks are necessary, but still they are dangerous.
Anyway we don't have problems because of the banks, but because of the euro.
Just big mistake, result of cheap propaganda for simple people.
Bank can be ok if there are good laws and control and same for EURO!
you are too much ignorant to steal my time discussing of this bullshits!
Dont discuss this with me, just open your eyes and stop eating that cheap propaganda :-D
and ? Most of that people would never have right to have houses due to their weak economics power. So bank can take that house, sold it and the rest of loan people had to pay back in next years. I dont care if they have where to live. Or your state can make law where is possibility to make personal bankrupcy, so they will lose their house but the rest of loan will be canceled. Bank will have problem too but it is ok, it is also mistake of bank giving big loans to people who are not so economics strong.
You can see that system is ok, just abusing the system is bad.
THAT IS FALSE!
This is a PRIVATE debit crisis.
I dont care if private or state crises it is. It is very same.
NB: numbers invented by some fantasy burocrats, in fact those number are never been explained!I would like the name of your school where you listen this fairy tales :-DD. I dont know exact reason for 3,5% but I suppose that it is because they belive that GDP growing around 3,5% is possible so same loan is ok. But even if my estimation is wrong, be sure that they calculated it :-)
Banks are necessary, but still they are dangerous.
Anyway we don't have problems because of the banks, but because of the euro.
Just big mistake, result of cheap propaganda for simple people.
Bank can be ok if there are good laws and control and same for EURO!
you are too much ignorant to steal my time discussing of this bullshits!
Dont discuss this with me, just open your eyes and stop eating that cheap propaganda :-D
and ? Most of that people would never have right to have houses due to their weak economics power. So bank can take that house, sold it and the rest of loan people had to pay back in next years
but it doesn't work.
Who buys those houses from banks? nobody, lot of them are for sale, their price falls and people without work can't buy them..
so banks were going bailout.
When (f.e) Bankia fail, you probably will say, they deserved it. well I agree.
But Merkel doesn't agree with us.
She thinks that Bankia has taken a enormous quantity of loans from German banks. And she don't want them to fail too..
That's obviuos if you think about.
Why different rates are in the same currency area?
Because of different risks rates.
So if German private money invade the banks of spain, they go there to find a bigger risk.
But at the time to pay this risk cost... something always happens!!!
I dont know exact reason for 3,5% but I suppose that it is because they belive that GDP growing around 3,5% is possible so same loan is ok. But even if my estimation is wrong, be sure that they calculated it :-)
You are wrong.
It is a fantasy number invented on a political base.
I can't prove the absence of something, I think that if you think there are some "scientific" belief under it, it's you turn to prove somethig.
Bank can be ok if there are good laws and control and same for EURO!
you don't want to understand.
I elencated you all the points of this crisis, explained Why euro is impossible to go on, facts are all showing instability and crissi signs..
but you still prefer to listen your tv..
believe in what you want.
just open your eyes and stop eating that cheap propaganda
ok, take care.
(and try to understand in time when to take away your money from your bank!!!)
but it doesn't work.
Who buys those houses from banks? nobody, lot of them are for sale, their price falls and people without work can't buy them..
so banks were going bailout.
When (f.e) Bankia fail, you probably will say, they deserved it. well I agree.
But Merkel doesn't agree with us.
She thinks that Bankia has taken a enormous quantity of loans from German banks. And she don't want them to fail too..
That's obviuos if you think about.
Why different rates are in the same currency area?
Because of different risks rates.
So if German private money invade the banks of spain, they go there to find a bigger risk.
But at the time to pay this risk cost... something always happens!!!
I dont know exact reason for 3,5% but I suppose that it is because they belive that GDP growing around 3,5% is possible so same loan is ok. But even if my estimation is wrong, be sure that they calculated it :-)
You are wrong.
It is a fantasy number invented on a political base.
I can't prove the absence of something, I think that if you think there are some "scientific" belief under it, it's you turn to prove somethig.
Bank can be ok if there are good laws and control and same for EURO!
you don't want to understand.
I elencated you all the points of this crisis, explained Why euro is impossible to go on, facts are all showing instability and crissi signs..
but you still prefer to listen your tv..
believe in what you want.
just open your eyes and stop eating that cheap propaganda
ok, take care.
(and try to understand in time when to take away your money from your bank!!!)
Who buys those houses from banks? nobody, lot of them are for sale, their price falls and people without work can't buy them..
Who cares about this? I dont care if banks can not sell the houses, their business. And yes they can go bailout cos they gave bad debts for that houses to people who were not strong, economically strong enough.
And people without job ... it is another problem....not for this topic.
She thinks that Bankia has taken a enormous quantity of loans from German banks. And she don't want them to fail too..
That is true :-). Also fact that rescue plan for Greece was made mainly for reason to save german and french banks by diversification of risk. I agree, germans know how to save their banks :-), but it is still debate about who will win in area where a lot of subjects are abusing the system. IF!, IF that german and french banks would go to bailout there would be never such a ill situation that banks are giving huge loans to country which seems not to be able to pay it back. And this is the point ! But all banks know that somebody will have to save them, so they very likely abuse the system and give to greece next and next money. But it is still abusing the system and I am telling that system without abusing is ok. I am saying that all country debts above 50-60% are very risky and not sustainable if crises start some day. In people case, nobody can have so huge debt :-). I dont have any debt but most of my friends have debt about 20-30% of net monthly income.
I can't prove the absence of something,
You can not deny mathematical rules :-). You can just say that math is not working well for us because people dont respect mathematical rules and laws and abuse it. But it is not mistake of math so not mistake of system. System with all difficult financial tools and so just seems to be difficult. The core is very simple, it is math. But making this math much difficult allow to clever people abuse system. So we just need good laws for this case.
but you still prefer to listen your tv..
sorry, I am quite busy man, I dont have chance listen to my TV/radio :-D, neither read mainstream media. That is the reason why I know that system is ok, I look on system rules and I see that system is abusing. That is all. All the rest are just political stories.
(and try to understand in time when to take away your money from your bank!!!
People in the south countries are taking a lot of loans so they can have money in bank, me not, I am poor man :-D. I know what are my economics possibilities so I live very modesty :-)
Who cares about this? I dont care if banks can not sell the houses, their business. And yes they can go bailout cos they gave bad debts for that houses to people who were not strong, economically strong enough.
And people without job ... it is another problem....not for this topic.
She thinks that Bankia has taken a enormous quantity of loans from German banks. And she don't want them to fail too..
That is true :-). Also fact that rescue plan for Greece was made mainly for reason to save german and french banks by diversification of risk. I agree, germans know how to save their banks :-), but it is still debate about who will win in area where a lot of subjects are abusing the system. IF!, IF that german and french banks would go to bailout there would be never such a ill situation that banks are giving huge loans to country which seems not to be able to pay it back. And this is the point ! But all banks know that somebody will have to save them, so they very likely abuse the system and give to greece next and next money. But it is still abusing the system and I am telling that system without abusing is ok. I am saying that all country debts above 50-60% are very risky and not sustainable if crises start some day. In people case, nobody can have so huge debt :-). I dont have any debt but most of my friends have debt about 20-30% of net monthly income.
I can't prove the absence of something,
You can not deny mathematical rules :-). You can just say that math is not working well for us because people dont respect mathematical rules and laws and abuse it. But it is not mistake of math so not mistake of system. System with all difficult financial tools and so just seems to be difficult. The core is very simple, it is math. But making this math much difficult allow to clever people abuse system. So we just need good laws for this case.
but you still prefer to listen your tv..
sorry, I am quite busy man, I dont have chance listen to my TV/radio :-D, neither read mainstream media. That is the reason why I know that system is ok, I look on system rules and I see that system is abusing. That is all. All the rest are just political stories.
(and try to understand in time when to take away your money from your bank!!!
People in the south countries are taking a lot of loans so they can have money in bank, me not, I am poor man :-D. I know what are my economics possibilities so I live very modesty :-)
"business man/tourist:
why?
can't you do a moltiplication? what advantage give the same currency?"
Well this is pure logics. Money were invented because they are universe commodity, the more universe currency is than it better works for its purpose.
why?
can't you do a moltiplication? what advantage give the same currency?"
Well this is pure logics. Money were invented because they are universe commodity, the more universe currency is than it better works for its purpose.
Okay. In what category would you place Marx?
Marx isn't Rand. By giving other examples, Rand doesn't become someone else.
Is communism a valid theory?
Great example of a well working system .................... really valid indeed :/ lol
Like I said many times before, you're just making the classical leftist argument: moral superiority.
No, I say be consequent. If you stand for something and not only stand for something but preach and idealize it like you do, you should at least live that ideology or else it is nothing more as a lot of empty words. It's not by what you say, but by what you do that shows what you really stand for. So, what do you do to live your ideology?
So I do play the ball, I only use you as an example.
Sure you do.
Again, no I don't. I don't live according a political ideology as I already explained in my previous post. I live according the morals and values I'm born with and I have learned/ been teached in my childhood, and shaped these (because of many factors) during my live to who I am today.
You seriously expect me to think about myself because you have the same feeling when talking to a religious person? You seriously expect that?
Looking in a mirror from time to time is always smart to do.
Marx isn't Rand. By giving other examples, Rand doesn't become someone else.
Is communism a valid theory?
Great example of a well working system .................... really valid indeed :/ lol
Like I said many times before, you're just making the classical leftist argument: moral superiority.
No, I say be consequent. If you stand for something and not only stand for something but preach and idealize it like you do, you should at least live that ideology or else it is nothing more as a lot of empty words. It's not by what you say, but by what you do that shows what you really stand for. So, what do you do to live your ideology?
So I do play the ball, I only use you as an example.
Sure you do.
Again, no I don't. I don't live according a political ideology as I already explained in my previous post. I live according the morals and values I'm born with and I have learned/ been teached in my childhood, and shaped these (because of many factors) during my live to who I am today.
You seriously expect me to think about myself because you have the same feeling when talking to a religious person? You seriously expect that?
Looking in a mirror from time to time is always smart to do.
Look on this:
http://youtu.be/oWDZ2PgD870
This video shows us, that nobody can blame just one side of that conflict, palestinians seems to know very good how to abuse european people by false videos "of reality" :-(.
It is very hard to make good name for jewish people if there so many such a videos for europeans who usually dont want to examine reality.
So as I hate wars and dont like any violence from isreal side, now I had to say that there is really some kind of anti-jewish propaganda in EU.
(edited)
http://youtu.be/oWDZ2PgD870
This video shows us, that nobody can blame just one side of that conflict, palestinians seems to know very good how to abuse european people by false videos "of reality" :-(.
It is very hard to make good name for jewish people if there so many such a videos for europeans who usually dont want to examine reality.
So as I hate wars and dont like any violence from isreal side, now I had to say that there is really some kind of anti-jewish propaganda in EU.
(edited)
Ofcourse there is. Both sides very good with propaganda and shit, let them fight eachother I don't care anymore, because theire like little children going on and on because they wanna have all the candy.
nobady here read about the crash course of chris martenson or see the movie Zeitgeist adendum ?
the system is bad, and all the economys will go to trush, its no enought money circulating to pay all the debts of the countrys (all the countrys have debts, who its supose to pay the debts? ) in south america had happened argentina 2001, now its have place in cyprus, spain, italia, portugal and others pass this to, and all the countrys will go to crash banks, its a question of time, i recommend you see the documentary, its no long and its in many languages.
http://www.peakprosperity.com/crashcourse
the system is bad, and all the economys will go to trush, its no enought money circulating to pay all the debts of the countrys (all the countrys have debts, who its supose to pay the debts? ) in south america had happened argentina 2001, now its have place in cyprus, spain, italia, portugal and others pass this to, and all the countrys will go to crash banks, its a question of time, i recommend you see the documentary, its no long and its in many languages.
http://www.peakprosperity.com/crashcourse
Who cares about this? I dont care if banks can not sell the houses, their business. And yes they can go bailout cos they gave bad debts for that houses to people who were not strong, economically strong enough.
And people without job ... it is another problem....not for this topic.
try to stay into discussion:
If the problem is who borrow money without garancy, asnwering (you did) that nobody does it is wrong.
they do using houses as garancy, but it leads to crisis when some bubble (lehman br.) explode somewhere in the wordl.
People without jobs, will soon stop to buy german products. the it will become a problem even in your tv.
That is true :-). Also fact that rescue plan for Greece was made mainly for reason to save german and french banks by diversification of risk. I agree, germans know how to save their banks :-), but it is still debate about who will win in area where a lot of subjects are abusing the system. IF!, IF that german and french banks would go to bailout there would be never such a ill situation that banks are giving huge loans to country which seems not to be able to pay it back. And this is the point ! But all banks know that somebody will have to save them, so they very likely abuse the system and give to greece next and next money. But it is still abusing the system and I am telling that system without abusing is ok. I am saying that all country debts above 50-60% are very risky and not sustainable if crises start some day. In people case, nobody can have so huge debt :-). I dont have any debt but most of my friends have debt about 20-30% of net monthly income.
I agree in the general sense.
But I advise you, there are no chanches at all this system can run in a different way.
When there is a power stronger than the others that is runned by private interests, it always end in a fake democracy.
now we have the capital power, controlled BY the banks, two hundered years ago we had the military power.. but the sense is the same.
I can't prove the absence of something,
You can not deny mathematical rules :-). You can just say that math is not working well for us because people dont respect mathematical rules and laws and abuse it. But it is not mistake of math so not mistake of system. System with all difficult financial tools and so just seems to be difficult. The core is very simple, it is math. But making this math much difficult allow to clever people abuse system. So we just need good laws for this case.
NO.
You said there's an economical rule that doesn't exist (3% deficit over GDP maximum).
this rule was invented by some politician at Maastriict treaty. it has no economical sense.
It is an invenction, that some politician wants us to believe in.
There 's no math under it. any way the prove of the presence of some kind of economical theory to base this shit, is to be given from you.
That is the reason why I know that system is ok, I look on system rules and I see that system is abusing. That is all. All the rest are just political stories.
LOL. this statement was the same the slavery-fans was using some century ago.
never admit the reality. always believe is someone fault.
A moral view over economics is always the worst error to be done.
People in the south countries are taking a lot of loans so they can have money in bank, me not, I am poor man :-D. I know what are my economics possibilities so I live very modesty :-)
people of the south lost almost 20 years of work (and the productivity of an italian is bigger than the productivity of a german, but this statistic doesn't appear in tv..) .
but don't lose your faith, at least until your savings get trash...
And people without job ... it is another problem....not for this topic.
try to stay into discussion:
If the problem is who borrow money without garancy, asnwering (you did) that nobody does it is wrong.
they do using houses as garancy, but it leads to crisis when some bubble (lehman br.) explode somewhere in the wordl.
People without jobs, will soon stop to buy german products. the it will become a problem even in your tv.
That is true :-). Also fact that rescue plan for Greece was made mainly for reason to save german and french banks by diversification of risk. I agree, germans know how to save their banks :-), but it is still debate about who will win in area where a lot of subjects are abusing the system. IF!, IF that german and french banks would go to bailout there would be never such a ill situation that banks are giving huge loans to country which seems not to be able to pay it back. And this is the point ! But all banks know that somebody will have to save them, so they very likely abuse the system and give to greece next and next money. But it is still abusing the system and I am telling that system without abusing is ok. I am saying that all country debts above 50-60% are very risky and not sustainable if crises start some day. In people case, nobody can have so huge debt :-). I dont have any debt but most of my friends have debt about 20-30% of net monthly income.
I agree in the general sense.
But I advise you, there are no chanches at all this system can run in a different way.
When there is a power stronger than the others that is runned by private interests, it always end in a fake democracy.
now we have the capital power, controlled BY the banks, two hundered years ago we had the military power.. but the sense is the same.
I can't prove the absence of something,
You can not deny mathematical rules :-). You can just say that math is not working well for us because people dont respect mathematical rules and laws and abuse it. But it is not mistake of math so not mistake of system. System with all difficult financial tools and so just seems to be difficult. The core is very simple, it is math. But making this math much difficult allow to clever people abuse system. So we just need good laws for this case.
NO.
You said there's an economical rule that doesn't exist (3% deficit over GDP maximum).
this rule was invented by some politician at Maastriict treaty. it has no economical sense.
It is an invenction, that some politician wants us to believe in.
There 's no math under it. any way the prove of the presence of some kind of economical theory to base this shit, is to be given from you.
That is the reason why I know that system is ok, I look on system rules and I see that system is abusing. That is all. All the rest are just political stories.
LOL. this statement was the same the slavery-fans was using some century ago.
never admit the reality. always believe is someone fault.
A moral view over economics is always the worst error to be done.
People in the south countries are taking a lot of loans so they can have money in bank, me not, I am poor man :-D. I know what are my economics possibilities so I live very modesty :-)
people of the south lost almost 20 years of work (and the productivity of an italian is bigger than the productivity of a german, but this statistic doesn't appear in tv..) .
but don't lose your faith, at least until your savings get trash...
Marx isn't Rand. By giving other examples, Rand doesn't become someone else.
Just answer the question. Do you put Marx in the SciFi category or not? If not, what's the difference?
Quite frankly, I'm getting worried. Putting philosophical books you don't like in the SciFi category is dangerous. Are you okay? ;-)
Great example of a well working system .................... really valid indeed :/ lol
Lol what you want, it seems you have difficulties answering questions. I'm just holding a mirror, Charles, it seems like you can't handle it. ;-)
No, I say be consequent. If you stand for something and not only stand for something but preach and idealize it like you do, you should at least live that ideology or else it is nothing more as a lot of empty words. It's not by what you say, but by what you do that shows what you really stand for. So, what do you do to live your ideology?
First of all, every single time you try you show me that you don't know a thing about my ideology. Secondly, if you're not answering my questions, I'm not answering yours. The mirror, Charles, the mirror. Look at it! ;-)
Looking in a mirror from time to time is always smart to do.
But do it too often and one becomes vain.
(edited)
Just answer the question. Do you put Marx in the SciFi category or not? If not, what's the difference?
Quite frankly, I'm getting worried. Putting philosophical books you don't like in the SciFi category is dangerous. Are you okay? ;-)
Great example of a well working system .................... really valid indeed :/ lol
Lol what you want, it seems you have difficulties answering questions. I'm just holding a mirror, Charles, it seems like you can't handle it. ;-)
No, I say be consequent. If you stand for something and not only stand for something but preach and idealize it like you do, you should at least live that ideology or else it is nothing more as a lot of empty words. It's not by what you say, but by what you do that shows what you really stand for. So, what do you do to live your ideology?
First of all, every single time you try you show me that you don't know a thing about my ideology. Secondly, if you're not answering my questions, I'm not answering yours. The mirror, Charles, the mirror. Look at it! ;-)
Looking in a mirror from time to time is always smart to do.
But do it too often and one becomes vain.
(edited)
they do using houses as garancy, but it leads to crisis when some bubble (lehman br.) explode somewhere in the wordl.
Housing bubble is there just because states allow or dont control financial market. Stupid "modern" financial tools allow this. You can not say that system is bad because system is abusing, that is what I am talking.
People and banks should pay for this mistake.
There are also more simple house loans (fix loans, value can not change) but if somebody wants more money for more expensive house, he is going to risk. I would never take loan for house if I see that there is something wrong on the market.
now we have the capital power, controlled BY the banks,
This is just fairy tale :-). Of course that bank can change people mind in election cos people are sheep and democracy is crap, but bank can not vote anybody, just people. But yes this system called democracy is ill. And bank can also buy politicians, but we have also courts :-).
you can see, system is abusing, if nobody is abusing it, it works. But people will never change this.
Look, what happened after crises ? What people changed in election ? Nothing. So if people are sheep, they deserve to be cheated, but it is not mistake of system, it is just sad true that even if system is good, people are sheep and always was.
this rule was invented by some politician at Maastriict treaty. it has no economical sense.
as I said, it can be probably connected with growing of GDP :-), and this has mathematical and economical sense.
LOL. this statement was the same the slavery-fans was using some century ago.
and ? It is true, that system works too but it was not human and people on the world also with me refused it. So where is problem ?
people of the south lost almost 20 years of work (and the productivity of an italian is bigger than the productivity of a german, but this statistic doesn't appear in tv..) .
My wife was in France for 2 weeks couple of years ago and she told me everything about france productivity :-).
And my friend was in Portuguese half of year and it was same. you guys just dont know what productivity is :-).
Just come to Slovakia and try to alive here :-D ! you would never make it !
I work 9-10 in work and 1-2 hour at home daily, during weeking just 2-3 hours maybe. And simple workers usually works 10-14 hours daily. Of course just that rich one, which have salary about 1000€ :-DD, that simple people who get usually 400€ net work 8,5 hours or little more.
Housing bubble is there just because states allow or dont control financial market. Stupid "modern" financial tools allow this. You can not say that system is bad because system is abusing, that is what I am talking.
People and banks should pay for this mistake.
There are also more simple house loans (fix loans, value can not change) but if somebody wants more money for more expensive house, he is going to risk. I would never take loan for house if I see that there is something wrong on the market.
now we have the capital power, controlled BY the banks,
This is just fairy tale :-). Of course that bank can change people mind in election cos people are sheep and democracy is crap, but bank can not vote anybody, just people. But yes this system called democracy is ill. And bank can also buy politicians, but we have also courts :-).
you can see, system is abusing, if nobody is abusing it, it works. But people will never change this.
Look, what happened after crises ? What people changed in election ? Nothing. So if people are sheep, they deserve to be cheated, but it is not mistake of system, it is just sad true that even if system is good, people are sheep and always was.
this rule was invented by some politician at Maastriict treaty. it has no economical sense.
as I said, it can be probably connected with growing of GDP :-), and this has mathematical and economical sense.
LOL. this statement was the same the slavery-fans was using some century ago.
and ? It is true, that system works too but it was not human and people on the world also with me refused it. So where is problem ?
people of the south lost almost 20 years of work (and the productivity of an italian is bigger than the productivity of a german, but this statistic doesn't appear in tv..) .
My wife was in France for 2 weeks couple of years ago and she told me everything about france productivity :-).
And my friend was in Portuguese half of year and it was same. you guys just dont know what productivity is :-).
Just come to Slovakia and try to alive here :-D ! you would never make it !
I work 9-10 in work and 1-2 hour at home daily, during weeking just 2-3 hours maybe. And simple workers usually works 10-14 hours daily. Of course just that rich one, which have salary about 1000€ :-DD, that simple people who get usually 400€ net work 8,5 hours or little more.
Housing bubble is there just because states allow or dont control financial market.
I think you didn't uderstand what happened (but I explained too munch times, now this is you fault)
now we have the capital power, controlled BY the banks,
This is just fairy tale :-). Of course that bank can change people mind in election cos people are sheep and democracy is crap, but bank can not vote anybody, just people.
You always mess who I vote, with the decision that are taken.
In Italy we had Berlusconi (that is a criminal, but won elections),
can you remember how his government was replaced?
no?
search by yourself.
there's no thing more stupid than blame democracy for the lack of democracy..
Look, what happened after crises ? What people changed in election ? Nothing.
are you seriuos?
There were ENORMUS chancging in almost every country ..
In italy M5s taked 26%, and it's born by 2 years..
you know nothing.
as I said, it can be probably connected with growing of GDP :-), and this has mathematical and economical sense.
as i said, it is a bullshit , maybe invented for some political advantage...
My wife was in France for 2 weeks couple of years ago and she told me everything about france productivity :-).
And my friend was in Portuguese half of year and it was same. you guys just dont know what productivity is :-).
Just come to Slovakia and try to alive here :-D ! you would never make it !
I work 9-10 in work and 1-2 hour at home daily, during weeking just 2-3 hours maybe. And simple workers usually works 10-14 hours daily. Of course just that rich one, which have salary about 1000€ :-DD, that simple people who get usually 400€ net work 8,5 hours or little more.
LOL.
you know nothing.
using french and portugese examples (not statistic) to prove something is something in italy we use to call "mi ha detto mio cugggino .." (translation: my cousin told me that..--> bullshit)
take a look
forget what you hear in tv man. that are all lies.
I think you didn't uderstand what happened
I am persuade that it was made by modern financial tools which were deforming real values in financial market. Try make currency with gold and such a bubble would never happen.
There were ENORMUS chancging in almost every country ..
Ok. I can say that there is very little what was changed in countries around. But maybe in another countries something important changed :-)
"mi ha detto mio cugggino .."
I worked also in cars company for a while and I know situation in EU very well. A lot of owners wanted close down south and western automotive and its suppliers companies during crises but there were strikes controlled by government so they had to limit production mostly in the central europe plants, no matter that we are making much higher profit that those one are :-)
I am persuade that it was made by modern financial tools which were deforming real values in financial market. Try make currency with gold and such a bubble would never happen.
There were ENORMUS chancging in almost every country ..
Ok. I can say that there is very little what was changed in countries around. But maybe in another countries something important changed :-)
"mi ha detto mio cugggino .."
I worked also in cars company for a while and I know situation in EU very well. A lot of owners wanted close down south and western automotive and its suppliers companies during crises but there were strikes controlled by government so they had to limit production mostly in the central europe plants, no matter that we are making much higher profit that those one are :-)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/31/egypt-cairo-women-rights-revolution
Women stood shoulder to shoulder with men in Tahrir Square in 2011. Now they are back on the streets, opposing a new constitution that sweeps away their rights and opens the way for girls of 13 to be married. And in Cairo's slums, life grows harder as the gulf between the sexes widens.
Article is very long you can read rest there. The Muslim Brotherhood seems to be full off pedophiles wanting to allow girls to marry from age 13, f**cked up world we live in.
(edited)
Women stood shoulder to shoulder with men in Tahrir Square in 2011. Now they are back on the streets, opposing a new constitution that sweeps away their rights and opens the way for girls of 13 to be married. And in Cairo's slums, life grows harder as the gulf between the sexes widens.
Article is very long you can read rest there. The Muslim Brotherhood seems to be full off pedophiles wanting to allow girls to marry from age 13, f**cked up world we live in.
(edited)
Quite frankly, I'm getting worried. Putting philosophical books you don't like in the SciFi category is dangerous. Are you okay? ;-)
I couldn't have said it better: But Is It Science Fiction? - Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged
Just answer the question. Do you put Marx in the SciFi category or not? If not, what's the difference?
and
Lol what you want, it seems you have difficulties answering questions. I'm just holding a mirror, Charles, it seems like you can't handle it. ;-)
I gave you an answer. You come up with the examples marxism and communism as valid theories while the whole communist world feld appart some years ago. That is prove enough it isn't a valid theorie at all. Same problem that will never make this theory valid, the logic is missing: to make communism work you have to ignore and rule out well known and common human characteristics which will never correspond with the theory and just can't be ignored and ruled out.
First of all, every single time you try you show me that you don't know a thing about my ideology. Secondly, if you're not answering my questions, I'm not answering yours. The mirror, Charles, the mirror. Look at it! ;-)
You can't answer as you don't do a thing to make your ideology work. I gave a lot of examples of things you don't do, but you can't mention a single thing you actually do, other than posts on a game forum.
Another problem is you switch between objectivism and libertarianism whenever it suits you to say I don't understand your ideology. Libertarianism is the polical ideology, so that's what I'm talking about.
I couldn't have said it better: But Is It Science Fiction? - Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged
Just answer the question. Do you put Marx in the SciFi category or not? If not, what's the difference?
and
Lol what you want, it seems you have difficulties answering questions. I'm just holding a mirror, Charles, it seems like you can't handle it. ;-)
I gave you an answer. You come up with the examples marxism and communism as valid theories while the whole communist world feld appart some years ago. That is prove enough it isn't a valid theorie at all. Same problem that will never make this theory valid, the logic is missing: to make communism work you have to ignore and rule out well known and common human characteristics which will never correspond with the theory and just can't be ignored and ruled out.
First of all, every single time you try you show me that you don't know a thing about my ideology. Secondly, if you're not answering my questions, I'm not answering yours. The mirror, Charles, the mirror. Look at it! ;-)
You can't answer as you don't do a thing to make your ideology work. I gave a lot of examples of things you don't do, but you can't mention a single thing you actually do, other than posts on a game forum.
Another problem is you switch between objectivism and libertarianism whenever it suits you to say I don't understand your ideology. Libertarianism is the polical ideology, so that's what I'm talking about.