Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD
Sorry for the two-week delay.
I can't see what the believe of some of those people have to do with youngster's rioting in the streets ? Are you really that stupid to automatically believe all these youngster are muslims just because they look arabian or what ?
And what can I write, when I see only muslims, Arabs, or anyone? When I see muslims, I called them muslims - what's wrong?
Of course, I don't think, that every muslim is a radical fanatic, but he still is a muslim - a member of a hostile culture, which place is not in Europe.
(edited)
I can't see what the believe of some of those people have to do with youngster's rioting in the streets ? Are you really that stupid to automatically believe all these youngster are muslims just because they look arabian or what ?
And what can I write, when I see only muslims, Arabs, or anyone? When I see muslims, I called them muslims - what's wrong?
Of course, I don't think, that every muslim is a radical fanatic, but he still is a muslim - a member of a hostile culture, which place is not in Europe.
(edited)
So hooligans who are white are all christian thugs ? Because they are white they must be christen ?
Same logic as immigrants for arabic countries are all muslims ?
Same logic as immigrants for arabic countries are all muslims ?
Us is just printing money cos they have worldwide dollar and they can cheat all world through dollar. So we can not comapre and I don't like printing money methods.
the same does China, Japan, USA .
Everybody cheats?
LOL
Nobody can "solve" its problem by cheating with euro. And one labour market, similar indirect taxes with possibilty have competition in direct taxes and so make whole european area very stable.
LOL, when you'll undestand what euro really is, it will be really too late.
the same does China, Japan, USA .
Everybody cheats?
LOL
Nobody can "solve" its problem by cheating with euro. And one labour market, similar indirect taxes with possibilty have competition in direct taxes and so make whole european area very stable.
LOL, when you'll undestand what euro really is, it will be really too late.
Afaik this isnt right for US. There are states with and without VAT, so several internetcompanies thinking about moving from California to Texas. Or think about the defacto corporatetax-free Delaware. Or why, you think, new automotive plants built in southern states and not in the classic car city Detroit (for example BMW built one several years ago in Tenessee)!? One reason for this, I think, is a competitive different taxation system beetween the states of the US. So, recurring at US, its not an example for "a currency union needs taxation union".
I think you are only partially right.
There are some differences (as levitate said: fiscal federalism),
but the fiscal structure of the federal state is the same in all states.
And the federal gov use taxation to redistribute the income from/to different states/areas.
So the question is if there is a situation of similar and connected taxation systems (etc, etc) not if there are identical systems..
I think this is quite useless to be discuss. It is something economists (real ones) accepted after WW, the first WW..
I think you are only partially right.
There are some differences (as levitate said: fiscal federalism),
but the fiscal structure of the federal state is the same in all states.
And the federal gov use taxation to redistribute the income from/to different states/areas.
So the question is if there is a situation of similar and connected taxation systems (etc, etc) not if there are identical systems..
I think this is quite useless to be discuss. It is something economists (real ones) accepted after WW, the first WW..
does that ring any bell?
go back to batiat institute facebook page and continue post them on "funny picture", that's your level of understanding!!
go back to batiat institute facebook page and continue post them on "funny picture", that's your level of understanding!!
but the fiscal structure of the federal state is the same in all states.
No it isn't.
And the federal gov use taxation to redistribute the income from/to different states/areas.
There is no direct redistribution system to compensate for differences between states (such systems do exist for instance between the Belgian sublevels and the German Bundesländer).
It is something economists (real ones) accepted after WW, the first WW..
No it isn't.
No it isn't.
And the federal gov use taxation to redistribute the income from/to different states/areas.
There is no direct redistribution system to compensate for differences between states (such systems do exist for instance between the Belgian sublevels and the German Bundesländer).
It is something economists (real ones) accepted after WW, the first WW..
No it isn't.
There is no direct redistribution
ok,ok not direct.
So what?
2 x No it isn't
2 x LOL
ok,ok not direct.
So what?
2 x No it isn't
2 x LOL
Nvm, talking to a wall is quite stupid so I'll stop doing that.
(edited)
(edited)
People like criticize and of course euro has some mistakes or not euro, but EU.
But people never show better solutions cos there is not better solution. Everybody can criticize cos this is what everybody can :-).
If there are not so huge debts in some countries, (I am talking about rate according to gdp, not total amount) euro would be much stable and very good project. Very helpful especially in crises. But some people like you are criticizing euro cos big debts are making troubles in your national fiances.
What to say more.... I can just repeat previous sentence:
If there are not so huge debts in some countries and balanced budgets, euro would be very stable and very good project.
But people never show better solutions cos there is not better solution. Everybody can criticize cos this is what everybody can :-).
If there are not so huge debts in some countries, (I am talking about rate according to gdp, not total amount) euro would be much stable and very good project. Very helpful especially in crises. But some people like you are criticizing euro cos big debts are making troubles in your national fiances.
What to say more.... I can just repeat previous sentence:
If there are not so huge debts in some countries and balanced budgets, euro would be very stable and very good project.
But people never show better solutions cos there is not better solution.
FALSE. The solution is FIRST to make an european union with real fiscal (labour, debt, public sector, school, transport etc) integration and only THEN to creata a common currency.
The short term solution will be the euro breaking (or the starting of northern country contribution to southern countries, with political problems and economical crisis lasting).
If there are not so huge debts in some countries, (I am talking about rate according to gdp, not total amount) euro would be much stable and very good project.
but we have an huge debt!!! So euro is not useful for us.
By the way, remember that is more the gdp loss than the debt stock increase that increase the debt/gdp of most countries..
FALSE. The solution is FIRST to make an european union with real fiscal (labour, debt, public sector, school, transport etc) integration and only THEN to creata a common currency.
The short term solution will be the euro breaking (or the starting of northern country contribution to southern countries, with political problems and economical crisis lasting).
If there are not so huge debts in some countries, (I am talking about rate according to gdp, not total amount) euro would be much stable and very good project.
but we have an huge debt!!! So euro is not useful for us.
By the way, remember that is more the gdp loss than the debt stock increase that increase the debt/gdp of most countries..
you have euro much longer time that Slovakia, but that fiscal budget law (3%) and 60% debt/gdp law was there much longer. The fact, that you f... all EU laws is not mistake of EURO.
Again and again. You are talking that euro is bad cos it is not compatible with stupid national finance policy and politics and I am saying that euro is a good project which is the best what we can have if it is managed well and under control and rules.
Why mostly (not just) southern countries have problems ? (usually that countries where people are lazy to work hard but they rather spending money :-D ?? )
I am waiting also for one stupid socialism theory here (that Franch one) that taking more loans will generate much more gdp so loans will save us :-D. That is the best one :-)
Again and again. You are talking that euro is bad cos it is not compatible with stupid national finance policy and politics and I am saying that euro is a good project which is the best what we can have if it is managed well and under control and rules.
Why mostly (not just) southern countries have problems ? (usually that countries where people are lazy to work hard but they rather spending money :-D ?? )
I am waiting also for one stupid socialism theory here (that Franch one) that taking more loans will generate much more gdp so loans will save us :-D. That is the best one :-)
you have euro much longer time that Slovakia, but that fiscal budget law (3%) and 60% debt/gdp law was there much longer. The fact, that you f... all EU laws is not mistake of EURO.
for your information:
-italy is IN the 3% deficit/GDP rule (a pure fantasy rule that come out from some euro-burocrats mind and has not any economical significate...)
-italy was over 100% debt/gdp BEFORE joining Maastricht threaty, so European "partners" know it from a long time.. (and even the 60% rule is witouth any economical sense..)
You are talking that euro is bad cos it is not compatible with stupid national finance policy and politics
NO. You don't read.
I blame euro for destroing private economy of countries,
I blame euro for being a cage where govs can't defend their citizens
I blame those sutpid rules europe invented because there are nothin else than the some northern banks interest under it.
(usually that countries where people are lazy to work hard but they rather spending money :-D ?? )
LOL, individual productivity is been always higher in Italy than in Germany, but is easy for ignorants and misinformed people to believe to prejudices and end believing this racist speechs.
I am waiting also for one stupid socialism theory here (that Franch one) that taking more loans will generate much more gdp so loans will save us.
How to confuse a keynesian approach with socialism. Very sad that people discuss things they really can't manage.
for your information:
-italy is IN the 3% deficit/GDP rule (a pure fantasy rule that come out from some euro-burocrats mind and has not any economical significate...)
-italy was over 100% debt/gdp BEFORE joining Maastricht threaty, so European "partners" know it from a long time.. (and even the 60% rule is witouth any economical sense..)
You are talking that euro is bad cos it is not compatible with stupid national finance policy and politics
NO. You don't read.
I blame euro for destroing private economy of countries,
I blame euro for being a cage where govs can't defend their citizens
I blame those sutpid rules europe invented because there are nothin else than the some northern banks interest under it.
(usually that countries where people are lazy to work hard but they rather spending money :-D ?? )
LOL, individual productivity is been always higher in Italy than in Germany, but is easy for ignorants and misinformed people to believe to prejudices and end believing this racist speechs.
I am waiting also for one stupid socialism theory here (that Franch one) that taking more loans will generate much more gdp so loans will save us.
How to confuse a keynesian approach with socialism. Very sad that people discuss things they really can't manage.
(a pure fantasy rule that come out from some euro-burocrats mind and has not any economical significate...)
LOL. Who told it ? Somebody who want spend more money said it ?
You should get your debt lower and not raise it.
If it was a fantasy rule why you have now problems :-DDD ?
I blame euro for destroing private economy of countries,
Euro helped to many countries with health economy. It help private sectore very well !
LOL, individual productivity is been always higher in Italy than in Germany, but is easy for ignorants and misinformed people to believe to prejudices and end believing this racist speechs.
My brother work in Germany many years, my friends were more than one year in Spain and Italy and in France.
So you have true, I am not reading economical numbers now I was talking about reality what my friends describe me. And reality of current numbers just prove that you have problems.
I dont see here any racism. If you see, sorry, but you have a problem.
-
keynesian approach with socialism.
It is very similar :-). Keynesians are orientated for production (not demand) and state expenditures helping for this. They want spend much more especially in crises, no matter that big expenditures can get them to crise very fast.
----------------
It is useless talk about what type of economy and managing is better. Please, use your vote in your election well so your country and your leaders will not ask whole europe for financial interventions and big risk guarantees because you can not take next big loan for low interest. Solve your problems and dont ask others for help, that I will stop "annoying" you :-). If you are asking europe for help, then just be quite, polite, make savings, pay back loans and work hard to fix it ! hawk!
LOL. Who told it ? Somebody who want spend more money said it ?
You should get your debt lower and not raise it.
If it was a fantasy rule why you have now problems :-DDD ?
I blame euro for destroing private economy of countries,
Euro helped to many countries with health economy. It help private sectore very well !
LOL, individual productivity is been always higher in Italy than in Germany, but is easy for ignorants and misinformed people to believe to prejudices and end believing this racist speechs.
My brother work in Germany many years, my friends were more than one year in Spain and Italy and in France.
So you have true, I am not reading economical numbers now I was talking about reality what my friends describe me. And reality of current numbers just prove that you have problems.
I dont see here any racism. If you see, sorry, but you have a problem.
-
keynesian approach with socialism.
It is very similar :-). Keynesians are orientated for production (not demand) and state expenditures helping for this. They want spend much more especially in crises, no matter that big expenditures can get them to crise very fast.
----------------
It is useless talk about what type of economy and managing is better. Please, use your vote in your election well so your country and your leaders will not ask whole europe for financial interventions and big risk guarantees because you can not take next big loan for low interest. Solve your problems and dont ask others for help, that I will stop "annoying" you :-). If you are asking europe for help, then just be quite, polite, make savings, pay back loans and work hard to fix it ! hawk!
LOL. Who told it ? Somebody who want spend more money said it ?
You should get your debt lower and not raise it.
If it was a fantasy rule why you have now problems :-DDD ?
just show ONE authentic economic study that talks about 3% or 60% limits for something...
euro helped to many countries with health economy. It help private sectore very well !
as always without any prove or argument for substaining it.
My brother work in Germany many years, my friends were more than one year in Spain and Italy and in France.
So you have true, I am not reading economical numbers now I was talking about reality what my friends describe me. And reality of current numbers just prove that you have problems.
I dont see here any racism. If you see, sorry, but you have a problem.
my cousin told me ...
LOL
Look at European Union stats..
keynesian approach with socialism.
It is very similar :-). Keynesians are orientated for production (not demand) and state expenditures helping for this. They want spend much more especially in crises, no matter that big expenditures can get them to crise very fast.
you know nothing.
You misunderstand keynes and neokeynesians, that did not say only this.
You misunderstand socialism, that didn't talk about using state to solve crisis.
We can ciriticize both (and I will have my point against both!!! believe it or not... ) but you must know something a little more before talking about it.
It is useless talk about what type of economy and managing is better. Please, use your vote in your election well so your country and your leaders will not ask whole europe for financial interventions
my country never asked for anything like this.
Solve your problems and dont ask others for help, that I will stop "annoying" you :-).
see above.
My problem is euro, can I get out?
Can I have a democratic debate opon it?
And thern can I have a vote?
No, I can't.
. If you are asking europe for help, then just be quite, polite, make savings, pay back loans and work hard to fix it ! hawk!
I want europe out of my (and my country) business, if you had only the suspect of what really europe union is, yuo'll think the same.
You should get your debt lower and not raise it.
If it was a fantasy rule why you have now problems :-DDD ?
just show ONE authentic economic study that talks about 3% or 60% limits for something...
euro helped to many countries with health economy. It help private sectore very well !
as always without any prove or argument for substaining it.
My brother work in Germany many years, my friends were more than one year in Spain and Italy and in France.
So you have true, I am not reading economical numbers now I was talking about reality what my friends describe me. And reality of current numbers just prove that you have problems.
I dont see here any racism. If you see, sorry, but you have a problem.
my cousin told me ...
LOL
Look at European Union stats..
keynesian approach with socialism.
It is very similar :-). Keynesians are orientated for production (not demand) and state expenditures helping for this. They want spend much more especially in crises, no matter that big expenditures can get them to crise very fast.
you know nothing.
You misunderstand keynes and neokeynesians, that did not say only this.
You misunderstand socialism, that didn't talk about using state to solve crisis.
We can ciriticize both (and I will have my point against both!!! believe it or not... ) but you must know something a little more before talking about it.
It is useless talk about what type of economy and managing is better. Please, use your vote in your election well so your country and your leaders will not ask whole europe for financial interventions
my country never asked for anything like this.
Solve your problems and dont ask others for help, that I will stop "annoying" you :-).
see above.
My problem is euro, can I get out?
Can I have a democratic debate opon it?
And thern can I have a vote?
No, I can't.
. If you are asking europe for help, then just be quite, polite, make savings, pay back loans and work hard to fix it ! hawk!
I want europe out of my (and my country) business, if you had only the suspect of what really europe union is, yuo'll think the same.
What's the point in discussing fiscal federalism and a common currency area with someone who claims the United States have one fiscal policy and one labor market, while some states don't have an income tax and/or a corporate tax (states like Wyoming, Texas or New Hampshire)?
someone who claims the United States have one fiscal policy and one labor market
didn't siad that.
You are sad, when you have nothing to do you twist my word.
I said:
So the question is if there is a situation of similar and connected taxation systems (etc, etc) not if there are identical systems..
but obviously discuss about real things is no of your interest, why?
Because you simply have no idea about them?
didn't siad that.
You are sad, when you have nothing to do you twist my word.
I said:
So the question is if there is a situation of similar and connected taxation systems (etc, etc) not if there are identical systems..
but obviously discuss about real things is no of your interest, why?
Because you simply have no idea about them?