Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD

You are such a damn hypocrite, unbelievable. I can't believe you can take yourself serious!

When it's about the US and EU, it's always about oil, money and how bad they are and destroy countries. Now it's about your beloved corrupt comrade Russia and you start to look for nuances and support the invader. Un-f*****-believable!!

And you dare to call yourself objective when it's about this kind of news. Go fool someone else!

(edited)

Title of UN Resolution 1514
Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples
this is, I think, a weak argument for Russia to overtake Crimea (without a vote). Who knows what other areas Putin will take to 'protect Russians'. northern Kazakhstan, watch out. Latvian unrest, watch out.
voting to have ones own country... I bet the people of Chechnya would like that.

thanks for putting into a coherent statement what I have thought about rumpil also

you forgot Eesti :-)

hehehe :-D

Russia needs only 1 Russian in your country and then they have right to protect it with 16k army :D


(edited)

60% russians on the Crimea is the only one :-) ?

How about 67.3% of Chechens and 23.5% of Russians in Chechnya?

and what? still its the another country...its not about inhabitans but rights

I like talks about how they are minority (not here), they can be in danger and so on...so if it was true, why they are still there? they can go home (if nationality is the problem), to the "best" country for them, so why are they living outside it?

(edited)

How about 67.3% of Chechens and 23.5% of Russians in Chechnya?

How does that influence Crimea? Not. Not at all.

No answer to Obama's war crimes?

I like talks about how they are minority (not here), they can be in danger and so on...so if it was true, why they are still there? they can go home (if nationality is the problem), to the "best" country for them, so why are they living outside it?

Are you serious? If so, are you drunk?

That's like telling the Hungarian Slovakians: go home, to Hungary. Crimea never was in majority Ukrainian. It was given to the Ukrainian Socialist Soviet Republic as a gift by the Russian SSR. (Yes, the Crimean Tatars were transported, but not Ukrainians.)

I'm not talking directly about Crimea now. I'm talking about rumpils opinion that the majority of inhabitants has the right to decide in what country they live.

i know history of it, its made up bigger, I know ;) dont have this oppinion but what do you think, if state has some minority areas where minority is majority, is it giving it right to occupy this area but its state?

dont have this oppinion but what do you think, if state has some minority areas where minority is majority, is it giving it right to occupy this area but its state?

I don't understand what you mean, but let me say this: if a majority of the Crimean population wants to be a part of Russia instead of Ukraine, I think that will should be respected.

Well yeah, Chechnya has the right to determine its own future. I know Russia is not accepting that, but the fact that Russia is not granting that right tot Chechnya does not mean that Crimea doesn't have the same right.