Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD
Israel’s Controversial Citizenship Act Passes
Apartheid in progress :S They should be ashamed and the world should do something! .... But the world won't or can't because of US veto's.
(edited)
Apartheid in progress :S They should be ashamed and the world should do something! .... But the world won't or can't because of US veto's.
(edited)
It's a normal situation of course, and every gouverment should learn from Israel.
(edited)
(edited)
It's a normal situation of course, and every gouverment should learn from Israel.
Seriously? So I should lose my Belgian nationality because I'd like to see Belgium disappear? What international recognized nationality do I have then?
(edited)
Seriously? So I should lose my Belgian nationality because I'd like to see Belgium disappear? What international recognized nationality do I have then?
(edited)
NATO Massacre: Vatican confirms 40 civilians murdered in Tripoli. Hospital targeted.
ROME (Reuters) - At least 40 civilians have been killed in air strikes by Western forces on Tripoli, the top Vatican official in the Libyan capital told a Catholic news agency on Thursday, quoting witnesses.
-----------------
The Vatican has confirmed that the coalition forces in Libya have murdered forty civilians in air attacks against the Libyan capital city, as the government forces continue to fight bravely against Al-Qaeda elements supported by the USA, UK and France. A civilian building has been struck. Mizda hospital targeted as Belgium joins the fray.
Giovanni Innocenzo Martinelli, the Apostolic Vicar in Tripoli, the highest representative of the Vatican in Libya, has confirmed government reports that forty civilians have been massacred by NATO aircraft in the capital: "The so-called humanitarian incursions have killed tens of civilians in certain neighbourhoods in Tripoli," he said. "I have gathered diverse statements by trustworthy people, specially in the neighbourhood of Buslim, where a civilian building has collapsed, causing 40 deaths," he added in declarations to Fides, the Vatican news agency.
if you want resource, use google, a lot of world media is writing about this.
ROME (Reuters) - At least 40 civilians have been killed in air strikes by Western forces on Tripoli, the top Vatican official in the Libyan capital told a Catholic news agency on Thursday, quoting witnesses.
-----------------
The Vatican has confirmed that the coalition forces in Libya have murdered forty civilians in air attacks against the Libyan capital city, as the government forces continue to fight bravely against Al-Qaeda elements supported by the USA, UK and France. A civilian building has been struck. Mizda hospital targeted as Belgium joins the fray.
Giovanni Innocenzo Martinelli, the Apostolic Vicar in Tripoli, the highest representative of the Vatican in Libya, has confirmed government reports that forty civilians have been massacred by NATO aircraft in the capital: "The so-called humanitarian incursions have killed tens of civilians in certain neighbourhoods in Tripoli," he said. "I have gathered diverse statements by trustworthy people, specially in the neighbourhood of Buslim, where a civilian building has collapsed, causing 40 deaths," he added in declarations to Fides, the Vatican news agency.
if you want resource, use google, a lot of world media is writing about this.
This is really sad for the innocence, but you have to put this in perspective, Khadaffi's troops murder many more people daily as all the casualties of NATO attacks till now, and they would have killed many more if the NATO wouldn't stop that army.
Btw, a building collapsed, the article doesn't say how of why. Also this article can't be taken seriously by the way it's been written :)
Btw, a building collapsed, the article doesn't say how of why. Also this article can't be taken seriously by the way it's been written :)
It usually happens, if you targeted building that it collapsed then... :-(
Khadaffi's troops murder many more people daily as a
this is not true !
Khadaffi's troops are killing opposite forces, not just "people" as you wrote. there is civil war.
Or rebels are not killing people, Khadaffis soldiers are robots ? :-)
But NATO hit building which than collapsed and kill 40 people, civilians.
Why was targeted hospital if they are makeing non-fly zone there ????
Just try to look on right information :-)
Khadaffi's troops murder many more people daily as a
this is not true !
Khadaffi's troops are killing opposite forces, not just "people" as you wrote. there is civil war.
Or rebels are not killing people, Khadaffis soldiers are robots ? :-)
But NATO hit building which than collapsed and kill 40 people, civilians.
Why was targeted hospital if they are makeing non-fly zone there ????
Just try to look on right information :-)
The rebellions are (mainly) Libyans, civilians with weapons. Khadaffi made his choice to attack the people when he had other options looking at his neighbors weeks before, an ofcourse the people fight back when they get shot when demonstrating. Or do you think it's normal to kill people when they are demonstrating? And ofcourse the international community must help those who are literally fighting for their rights and get killed for that by a lunatic dictator. If you think this is wrong to help these people you have a serious problem I think.
This is all to blame on Khadaffi's, even the unfortunate casualties of war, or civilians that are (voluntarily) used as shield. If you can't see that you are blinded by something, I don't know ...
This is all to blame on Khadaffi's, even the unfortunate casualties of war, or civilians that are (voluntarily) used as shield. If you can't see that you are blinded by something, I don't know ...
The rebellions are (mainly) Libyans, civilians with weapons.
This is really nice sentence.... :-)
Khadaffi made his choice to attack the people when he had other options looking at his neighbors weeks before, an ofcourse the people fight back when they get shot when demonstrating.
That is what mainstream media says. I think that all rebellions are made/imported by foreign country :-) and of course a some of Libyian people went on their side.
The fair result is that we can not prove any of versions, I dont have, you dont have prove.
Or do you think it's normal to kill people when they are demonstrating?
Why would Kaddafi kill "people" (I hope you think unarmed people) ? Russian army says that they can not confirm any air attacks on Libyan people, as west resources said us couple of weeks ago.
Western media are involved, Russian not, so what is more probably, who had true ?
And of course the international community must help those who are literally fighting for their rights and get killed for that by a lunatic dictator. If you think this is wrong to help these people you have a serious problem I think.
This is very funny argument... ok why NATO is not going to help for example Basque in their fight for freedom and rights or some rebels in north Ireland and so :-) ?
Help is good thing, if you know which side is good really.
I can say, why nato is not helping Libya against Al Quaeda which is on rebels side ?? The world is fighting against Al quaeda, isnt ?
Yes, I am blind. I see independent country which refused army contracts from French :-), which has the most oil resources in Africa and country which is independent of western colonization :-)
UNO allowed the world can make non-flight zone and all western country violated UNO resolution and started war. The most civilians (that without guns) died after starting this "liberation" action.
There is simple civil war, nothing more ! Just because western countries have some purposes to give away Kaddafi they called it "civilians fighting for human rights and freedom" :-)
This is really nice sentence.... :-)
Khadaffi made his choice to attack the people when he had other options looking at his neighbors weeks before, an ofcourse the people fight back when they get shot when demonstrating.
That is what mainstream media says. I think that all rebellions are made/imported by foreign country :-) and of course a some of Libyian people went on their side.
The fair result is that we can not prove any of versions, I dont have, you dont have prove.
Or do you think it's normal to kill people when they are demonstrating?
Why would Kaddafi kill "people" (I hope you think unarmed people) ? Russian army says that they can not confirm any air attacks on Libyan people, as west resources said us couple of weeks ago.
Western media are involved, Russian not, so what is more probably, who had true ?
And of course the international community must help those who are literally fighting for their rights and get killed for that by a lunatic dictator. If you think this is wrong to help these people you have a serious problem I think.
This is very funny argument... ok why NATO is not going to help for example Basque in their fight for freedom and rights or some rebels in north Ireland and so :-) ?
Help is good thing, if you know which side is good really.
I can say, why nato is not helping Libya against Al Quaeda which is on rebels side ?? The world is fighting against Al quaeda, isnt ?
Yes, I am blind. I see independent country which refused army contracts from French :-), which has the most oil resources in Africa and country which is independent of western colonization :-)
UNO allowed the world can make non-flight zone and all western country violated UNO resolution and started war. The most civilians (that without guns) died after starting this "liberation" action.
There is simple civil war, nothing more ! Just because western countries have some purposes to give away Kaddafi they called it "civilians fighting for human rights and freedom" :-)
you western European guys cannot understand a military definition of a civilian?
n.
A person following the pursuits of civil life, especially one who is not an active member of the military, the police, or a belligerent group.
A person who does not belong to a particular group or engage in a particular activity.
A specialist in Roman or civil law.
An unarmed person.
adj.
Of or relating to civilians or civil life; nonmilitary: civilian clothes; a civilian career.
Please stop be blind in believing NATO propaganda...
(edited)
n.
A person following the pursuits of civil life, especially one who is not an active member of the military, the police, or a belligerent group.
A person who does not belong to a particular group or engage in a particular activity.
A specialist in Roman or civil law.
An unarmed person.
adj.
Of or relating to civilians or civil life; nonmilitary: civilian clothes; a civilian career.
Please stop be blind in believing NATO propaganda...
(edited)
Just some things, I really have to go in a few minutes :)
This is very funny argument... ok why NATO is not going to help for example Basque in their fight for freedom and rights or some rebels in north Ireland and so :-) ?
These are 2 completely different situations, and also completely different as in Libya. You often make these kind of comparisons that really doesn't make any sense.
UNO allowed the world can make non-flight zone and all western country violated UNO resolution and started war.
This is what you think. The resolution is carried out as it should be done and is also legal (as long as the allies aren't giving weapons to 1 side). Yes, a lot of bombs but those are needed to take out radar-stations, anti-aircraft guns, important buildings, runways etc etc.
There is simple civil war, nothing more !
So? The UN has the right to step in when a civil-war is going on. Nothing illegal with that.
The most civilians (that without guns) died after starting this "liberation" action
This is really just a lie, prove me otherwise :)
This is very funny argument... ok why NATO is not going to help for example Basque in their fight for freedom and rights or some rebels in north Ireland and so :-) ?
These are 2 completely different situations, and also completely different as in Libya. You often make these kind of comparisons that really doesn't make any sense.
UNO allowed the world can make non-flight zone and all western country violated UNO resolution and started war.
This is what you think. The resolution is carried out as it should be done and is also legal (as long as the allies aren't giving weapons to 1 side). Yes, a lot of bombs but those are needed to take out radar-stations, anti-aircraft guns, important buildings, runways etc etc.
There is simple civil war, nothing more !
So? The UN has the right to step in when a civil-war is going on. Nothing illegal with that.
The most civilians (that without guns) died after starting this "liberation" action
This is really just a lie, prove me otherwise :)
He never proves what he says, so don't wait for that ;-)
Totally agree with you by the way.
Totally agree with you by the way.
omg, then I give you another argument:
Why UNO or NATO weren´t interested in civil war in Uganda...there were more than 200k real civilians killed, small children were begging to slavery or used as kid military forces...this was much more atrocity, than Libyan conflict...let me guess...because Uganda doesn´t have an oil???
Why UNO or NATO weren´t interested in civil war in Uganda...there were more than 200k real civilians killed, small children were begging to slavery or used as kid military forces...this was much more atrocity, than Libyan conflict...let me guess...because Uganda doesn´t have an oil???
Russian army says that they can not confirm any air attacks on Libyan people, as west resources said us couple of weeks ago.
Western media are involved, Russian not, so what is more probably, who had true ?
Russia has a huge stake in this conflict as hey are a major supplier of military hardware of all kinds to Libya. Russia also has a huge track record of sudden blindness whenever and wherever it was only ever so slightly beneficial to be blind. When you read 'cannot', you ought to read: will not.
If Libyan airforce officers desert because they cannot follow orders - bomb civilians - they must of course be delusional if the Russian army says there wasn't any such thing. Seriously.
Western media are involved, Russian not, so what is more probably, who had true ?
Russia has a huge stake in this conflict as hey are a major supplier of military hardware of all kinds to Libya. Russia also has a huge track record of sudden blindness whenever and wherever it was only ever so slightly beneficial to be blind. When you read 'cannot', you ought to read: will not.
If Libyan airforce officers desert because they cannot follow orders - bomb civilians - they must of course be delusional if the Russian army says there wasn't any such thing. Seriously.