Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD
Serbians might argue that Albanians were occupying Kosovo.
(Not that I agree. Just saying.)
(Not that I agree. Just saying.)
just nuke anyone that moves all problems will be fixed
Well, we are not all American Republicans, are we?
NATO in Serbia:
Now please, show me some crimean casualities.... I'll wait...
(edited)
Now please, show me some crimean casualities.... I'll wait...
(edited)
No need to post videos with dead people like that. Are you crazy? Kids like you play this game and not all are used to this shit. And I don't even want to see this crap when I come to Sokker. I already have to read a lot of crap and that's more then enough!
And your question is completely irrelevant, also after asking it more then ones. Read for example Nazis Take Austria. What did you say about trolling?
(edited)
And your question is completely irrelevant, also after asking it more then ones. Read for example Nazis Take Austria. What did you say about trolling?
(edited)
Why we should protect people from seing what they can see in tv 24h/7d?
This kind of moderating sucks!
Let people (of every age) know what planet they live in.
This kind of moderating sucks!
Let people (of every age) know what planet they live in.
This is a game!! If I want to see dead people on the news I watch the news, not Sokker. Is it so hard to keep in mind kids play this game?
I can't understand why it should interest me.
Look else where if you don't like.
(when people pretend to limit other person's freedom for their preference i lose my mind..)
Look else where if you don't like.
(when people pretend to limit other person's freedom for their preference i lose my mind..)
Actually you're right with this one, i've removed that video. But fellows, try to keep a civilized tone, what the hell, if someone has a different point of view, you call him an idiot.
sometimes I can't undestand your ways.
Talking about revolution (with DEADS), armies that occupies a territory (brute force use, and weapon display), politicians that talks about death, races, hostility and war...
but we should protect kids from the video watching????
we can take uor sons to school where they learn how men are killers, invaders, pedophiles, cheaters etc. But we can't show them a video of it, maybe a kid will understand all that for real...
:(
Talking about revolution (with DEADS), armies that occupies a territory (brute force use, and weapon display), politicians that talks about death, races, hostility and war...
but we should protect kids from the video watching????
we can take uor sons to school where they learn how men are killers, invaders, pedophiles, cheaters etc. But we can't show them a video of it, maybe a kid will understand all that for real...
:(
It's sad that you can't tell the difference between a sentence and a video. I'm 34yo and i'm shocked when i see a person buried out from a bombed building, imagine how a child would react. I'm not familiar with current teaching methods, but i'm pretty sure my history teacher didnt show us pictures with starving people on Leningrad's street and corpses from concentration camps when he was presenting us ww2.
It's too bad that we have to talk about these horrific things, there's no need to point them out here with videos.
It's too bad that we have to talk about these horrific things, there's no need to point them out here with videos.
My problem is not what you prefer (you can prefer whatever you like more), but what you impose to me not to see/post.
I can't understand why your preferences about videos or sentences had to interest to me (or to anyother people that comes here).
I can't understand why your preferences about videos or sentences had to interest to me (or to anyother people that comes here).
So all the dead people were a result of the NATO or were a result of etnic cleansing ?
In Crimea there are not 2 party's murdering eachother, so I don't see the relevance.
Let's stick to the fact here please.
If Crimea want to be indepent I have no problem with that. If Crimea wants to be part of Russia that seems a lot more difficult to arange but it would be possible I guess. But not after they were occupied by the Russians. This is ordinary land steeling under a so called "referendum".
Russian should move from occupied territory. Crimea should have a real referendum and they should take time to organize properly atleast a half year in my opnion.
And maybe when they are independant eventually after some time they could be part of Russia, but not the way it's going now.
In Crimea there are not 2 party's murdering eachother, so I don't see the relevance.
Let's stick to the fact here please.
If Crimea want to be indepent I have no problem with that. If Crimea wants to be part of Russia that seems a lot more difficult to arange but it would be possible I guess. But not after they were occupied by the Russians. This is ordinary land steeling under a so called "referendum".
Russian should move from occupied territory. Crimea should have a real referendum and they should take time to organize properly atleast a half year in my opnion.
And maybe when they are independant eventually after some time they could be part of Russia, but not the way it's going now.
Colonization part isn't relevant. I was thinking more in terms of "support independence, then annex, go to war with main country if necessary" :P
I fully see the problem with the current referendum scenario, but are you telling us that a referendum after 6 months of full control by the current Kiev government is to be trusted instead?
We don't even know if said government would survive any kind of election to begin with...
We don't even know if said government would survive any kind of election to begin with...